Reproduction barrier between two lineages of bed bug (Cimex lectularius) (Heteroptera: Cimicidae)

. 2015 Aug ; 114 (8) : 3019-25. [epub] 20150509

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25952703

Populations of bed bugs, Cimex lectularius, have increased in recent years spreading into numerous urban areas across the Western world and making them an increasingly important pest of the twenty-first century. Research into hybridization within and between different lineages of bed bugs can help us to understand processes of micro- and macro-evolution in these ectoparasites and may inform the control of this pest species. Hybridization experiments between two host lineages of bed bug (C. lectularius) from Central Europe (Czech Republic), those associated with humans and those with bats, were conducted under laboratory conditions. Number of eggs and early instars were compared between crosses of mixed host lineages (interspecific mating) with pairs from the same host lineage, those from the same locality and same lineage from different localities (intraspecific mating). While crosses within host lineages resulted in egg production and later instars, crosses between different host lineages were unsuccessful, although of the mated females possessed sperm in their mesospermaleges and/or seminal conceptacles. These crosses did not even result in egg production. Moreover, in the mixed lineage crosses, mortality rates in adults were higher (51 and 50% higher in bat and human lineage, respectively) than in those animals from the same lineage. Survival of adults was in pairs from the same locality slightly higher than in pairs from different localities and differed statistically. These results support the existence of post-mating barriers and show reproductive isolation between two lineages of C. lectularius. Bat and human host adaptations can promote evolving of such barriers and can be product of alloxenic speciation.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Insect Mol Biol. 2000 Aug;9(4):393-405 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5683-7 PubMed

Z Parasitenkd. 1955;17 (1):41-73 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Nov;72(11):7098-110 PubMed

Insect Mol Biol. 1997 Aug;6(3):301-4 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1455-8 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):649-52 PubMed

Genes (Basel). 2010 Jun 09;1(1):102-23 PubMed

Evolution. 2005 Apr;59(4):705-19 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2013 Nov;112(11):3897-904 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2015 Mar;24(5):980-92 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2000 Mar;30(3):299-304 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 28;361(1466):269-75 PubMed

Experientia. 1971 Jan 15;27(1):102-3 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 1994 Feb;72 ( Pt 2):163-7 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2012 Jul;111(1):457-69 PubMed

J Med Entomol. 2004 Nov;41(6):1175-8 PubMed

Am Nat. 2007 Feb;169(2):151-62 PubMed

BMC Biol. 2010 Sep 09;8:121 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar;22(6):1640-9 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):471-92 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...