The parahippocampal cortex and hippocampus are brain structures known to be involved in memory. However, the unique contribution of the parahippocampal cortex remains unclear. The current study investigates memory for object identity and memory of the configuration of objects in patients with small thermo-coagulation lesions to the hippocampus or the parahippocampal cortex. Results showed that in contrast to control participants and patients with damage to the hippocampus leaving the parahippocampal cortex intact, patients with lesions that included the right parahippocampal cortex (RPH) were severely impaired on a task that required learning the spatial configuration of objects on a computer screen; these patients, however, were not impaired at learning the identity of objects. Conversely, we found that patients with lesions to the right hippocampus (RH) or left hippocampus (LH), sparing the parahippocampal cortex, performed just as well as the control participants. Furthermore, they were not impaired on the object identity task. In the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiment, healthy young adults performed the same tasks. Consistent with the findings of the lesion study, the fMRI results showed significant activity in the RPH in the memory for the spatial configuration condition, but not memory for object identity. Furthermore, the pattern of fMRI activity measured in the baseline control conditions decreased specifically in the parahippocampal cortex as a result of the experimental task, providing evidence for task specific repetition suppression. In summary, while our previous studies demonstrated that the hippocampus is critical to the construction of a cognitive map, both the lesion and fMRI studies have shown an involvement of the RPH for learning spatial configurations of objects but not object identity, and that this takes place independent of the hippocampus.

Department of Experimental Psychology Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University Utrecht Netherlands

Department of Neurology Hospital Na Homolce Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital Na Homolce Prague Czech Republic ; Department of Neurology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Psychiatry Douglas Mental Health University Institute McGill University Montreal QC Canada

Department of Psychology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA

Department of Psychology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA ; ARL Division of Neural Systems Memory and Aging University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA

McConnell Brain Imaging Centre Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal QC Canada

Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Unit Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal QC Canada

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aguirre G. K., Detre J. A., Alsop D. C., D’esposito M. (1996). The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cereb. Cortex 6, 823–829. PubMed

Aguirre G. K., D’Esposito M. (1999). Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 122, 1613–1628. 10.1093/brain/122.9.1613 PubMed DOI

Allen J. J. B., Dikman Z. V., Nadel L. (1994). Scalp distribution of P3 in hippocampus- dependent and hippocampus-independent visual tasks: support for multiple P3 generators. Psychophysiology 31:S22.

Aminoff E., Gronau N., Bar M. (2007). The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1493–1503. 10.1093/cercor/bhl078 PubMed DOI

Auger S. D., Maguire E. A. (2013). Assessing the mechanism of response in the retrosplenial cortex of good and poor navigators. Cortex 49, 2904–2913. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Auger S. D., Mullally S. L., Maguire E. A. (2012). Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks. PLoS One 7:e43620. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043620 PubMed DOI PMC

Bar M., Aminoff E., Schacter D. L. (2008). Scenes unseen: the parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se. J. Neurosci. 28, 8539–8544. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0987-08.2008 PubMed DOI PMC

Berryhill M. E., Phuong L., Picasso L., Cabeza R., Olson I. R. (2007). Parietal lobe and episodic memory: bilateral damage causes impaired free recall of autobiographical memory. J. Neurosci. 27, 14415–14423. 10.1523/jneurosci.4163-07.2007 PubMed DOI PMC

Blatt G. J., Pandya D. N., Rosene D. L. (2003). Parcellation of cortical afferents to three distinct sectors in the parahippocampal gyrus of the rhesus monkey: an anatomical and neurophysiological study. J. Comp. Neurol. 466, 161–179. 10.1002/cne.10866 PubMed DOI

Bohbot V. D., Allen J. J., Nadel L. (2000). Memory deficits characterized by patterns of lesions to the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 911, 355–368. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06737.x PubMed DOI

Bohbot V. D., Iaria G., Petrides M. (2004). Hippocampal function and spatial memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging in healthy participants and performance of patients with medial temporal lobe resections. Neuropsychology 18, 418–425. 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.418 PubMed DOI

Bohbot V. D., Jech R., Ruzicka E., Nadel L., Kalina M., Stepánková K., et al. . (2002). Rat spatial memory tasks adapted for humans: characterization in subjects with intact brain and subjects with selective medial temporal lobe thermal lesions. Physiol. Res. 51, S49–S65. PubMed

Bohbot V. D., Kalina M., Stepankova K., Spackova N., Petrides M., Nadel L. (1998). Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex. Neuropsychologia 36, 1217–1238. 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00161-9 PubMed DOI

Brewer J. B., Zhao Z., Desmond J. E., Glover G. H., Gabrieli J. D. (1998). Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 281, 1185–1187. 10.1126/science.281.5380.1185 PubMed DOI

Broadbent N. J., Squire L. R., Clark R. E. (2004). Spatial memory, recognition memory and the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 101, 14515–14520. 10.1073/pnas.0406344101 PubMed DOI PMC

Brozinsky C. J., Yonelinas A. P., Kroll N. E., Ranganath C. (2005). Lag-sensitive repetition suppression effects in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus. Hippocampus 15, 557–561. 10.1002/hipo.20087 PubMed DOI

Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I. R., Moscovitch M. (2008). The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 613–625. 10.1038/nrn2459 PubMed DOI PMC

Ciaramelli E., Rosenbaum R. S., Solcz S., Levine B., Moscovitch M. (2010). Mental space travel: damage to posterior parietal cortex prevents egocentric navigation and reexperiencing of remote spatial memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 619–634. 10.1037/a0019181 PubMed DOI

Collins D. L., Neelin P., Peters T. M., Evans A. C. (1994). Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized talairach space. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18, 192–205. 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 PubMed DOI

Corkin S. (1984). Lasting consequences of bilateral medial temporal lobectomy: clinical course and experimental findings in H.M. Semin. Neurol. 4, 249–259. 10.1055/s-2008-1041556 DOI

Duzel E., Habib R., Rotte M., Guderian S., Tulving E., Heinze H. J. (2003). Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. J. Neurosci. 23, 9439–9444. PubMed PMC

Eichenbaum H. (2001). The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav. Brain Res. 127, 199–207. 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00365-5 PubMed DOI

Epstein R., Deyoe E. A., Press D. Z., Rosen A. C., Kanwisher N. (2001). Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 18, 481–508. 10.1080/02643290125929 PubMed DOI

Epstein R. A., Higgins J. S. (2007). Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1680–1693. 10.1093/cercor/bhl079 PubMed DOI

Epstein R. A., Higgins J. S., Thompson-Schill S. L. (2005). Learning places from views: variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 73–83. 10.1162/0898929052879987 PubMed DOI

Epstein R. A., Higgins J. S., Jablonski K., Feiler A. M. (2007). Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 3670–3683. 10.1152/jn.00003.2007 PubMed DOI

Epstein R., Kanwisher N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601. 10.1038/33402 PubMed DOI

Epstein R. A., Parker W. E., Feiler A. M. (2007). Where am i now? distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J. Neurosci. 27, 6141–6149. 10.1523/jneurosci.0799-07.2007 PubMed DOI PMC

Epstein R. A., Parker W. E., Feiler A. M. (2008). Two kinds of FMRI repetition suppression? evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 2877–2886. 10.1152/jn.90376.2008 PubMed DOI

Epstein R. A., Vass L. K. (2014). Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369:20120533. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0533 PubMed DOI PMC

Gaffan D. (1992). Amnesia for complex naturalistic scenes and for objects following fornix transection in the rhesus monkey. Eur. J. Neurosci. 4, 381–388. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1992.tb00886.x PubMed DOI

Goh J. O., Siong S. C., Park D., Gutchess A., Hebrank A., Chee M. W. (2004). Cortical areas involved in object, background and object-background processing revealed with functional magnetic resonance adaptation. J. Neurosci. 24, 10223–10228. 10.1523/jneurosci.3373-04.2004 PubMed DOI PMC

Habib M., Sirigu A. (1987). Pure topographical disorientation: a definition and anatomical basis. Cortex 23, 73–85. 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80020-5 PubMed DOI

Hartley T., Maguire E. A., Spiers H. J., Burgess N. (2003). The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 37, 877–888. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00095-3 PubMed DOI

Hayes S. M., Ryan L., Schnyer D. M., Nadel L. (2004). An fMRI study of episodic memory: retrieval of object, spatial and temporal information. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 885–896. 10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.885 PubMed DOI PMC

Howard L. R., Kumaran D., Ólafsdottir H. F., Spiers H. J. (2011). Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty. J. Neurosci. 31, 5253–5261. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6055-10.2011 PubMed DOI PMC

Howard L. R., Kumaran D., Ólafsdottir H. F., Spiers H. J. (2013). Dissociation between dorsal and ventral posterior parietal cortical responses to incidental changes in natural scenes. PLoS One 8:e67988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067988 PubMed DOI PMC

Hublet C., Demeurisse G. (1992). Pure topographical disorientation due to a deep-seated lesion with cortical remote effects. Cortex 28, 123–128. 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80170-0 PubMed DOI

Iaria G., Petrides M., Dagher A., Pike B., Bohbot V. D. (2003). Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. J. Neurosci. 23, 5945–5952. PubMed PMC

Janzen G., van Turennout M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 673–677. 10.1038/nn1257 PubMed DOI

Köhler S., Danckert S., Gati J. S., Menon R. S. (2005). Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: a comparison based on event-related fMRI. Hippocampus 15, 763–774. 10.1002/hipo.20098 PubMed DOI

Konishi K., Etchamendy N., Roy S., Marighetto A., Rajah N., Bohbot V. D. (2013). Decreased functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in the hippocampus in favor of the caudate nucleus in older adults tested in a virtual navigation task. Hippocampus 23, 1005–1014. 10.1002/hipo.22181 PubMed DOI

Landis T., Cummings J. L., Benson D. F., Palmer E. P. (1986). Loss of topographic familiarity. An environmental agnosia. Arch. Neurol. 43, 132–136. 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520020026011 PubMed DOI

Maguire E. A., Burke T., Phillips J., Staunton H. (1996). Topographical disorientation following unilateral temporal lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia 34, 993–1001. 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00022-x PubMed DOI

Malkova L., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Saunders R. C. (2001). Neurotoxic lesions of perirhinal cortex impair visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Neuroreport 12, 1913–1917. 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00029 PubMed DOI

Malkova L., Mishkin M. (2003). One-trial memory for object-place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey. J. Neurosci. 23, 1956–1965. PubMed PMC

Meunier M., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Murray E. A. (1993). Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13, 5418–5432. PubMed PMC

Milner B. (1972). Disorders of learning and memory after temporal lobe lesions in man. Clin. Neurosurg. 19, 421–446. PubMed

Morgan L. K., Macevoy S. P., Aguirre G. K., Epstein R. A. (2011). Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 31, 1238–1245. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4667-10.2011 PubMed DOI PMC

Murray E. A., Mishkin M. (1998). Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 18, 6568–6582. PubMed PMC

O’Keefe J., Nadel L. (1978). Biochemistry Oxford: Clarendon.

Packard M. G., Hirsh R., White N. M. (1989). Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. J. Neurosci. 9, 1465–1472. PubMed PMC

Parkinson J. K., Murray E. A., Mishkin M. (1988). A selective mnemonic role for the hippocampus in monkeys: memory for the location of objects. J. Neurosci. 8, 4159–4167. PubMed PMC

Petrides M. (1985). Deficits in associative-learning tasks after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 23, 601–614. 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90062-4 PubMed DOI

Pihlajamäki M., Tanila H., Könönen M., Hänninen T., Hämäläinen A., Soininen H., et al. . (2004). Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1939–1949. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03282.x PubMed DOI

Ploner C. J., Gaymard B. M., Rivaud-Péchoux S., Baulac M., Clémenceau S., Samson S., et al. . (2000). Lesions affecting the parahippocampal cortex yield spatial memory deficits in humans. Cereb. Cortex 10, 1211–1216. 10.1093/cercor/10.12.1211 PubMed DOI

Rockland K. S., Van Hoesen G. W. (1994). Direct temporal-occipital feedback connections to striate cortex (V1) in the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 4, 300–313. 10.1093/cercor/4.3.300 PubMed DOI

Rosenbaum R. S., Gilboa A., Levine B., Winocur G., Moscovitch M. (2009). Amnesia as an impairment of detail generation and binding: Evidence from personal, fictional and semantic narratives in K.C.. Neuropsychologia 47, 2181–2187. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.028 PubMed DOI

Rosenbaum R. S., Ziegler M., Winocur G., Grady C. L., Moscovitch M. (2004). “I have often walked down this street before”: fMRI studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment. Hippocampus 14, 826–835. 10.1002/hipo.10218 PubMed DOI

Scoville W. B., Milner B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 20, 11–21. 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 PubMed DOI PMC

Smith M. L., Milner B. (1989). Right hippocampal impairment in the recall of spatial location: encoding deficit or rapid forgetting?. Neuropsychology 27, 71–81. 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90091-2 PubMed DOI

Stepankova K., Fenton A. A., Pastalkova E., Kalina M., Bohbot V. D. (2004). Object-location memory impairment in patients with thermal lesions to the right or left hippocampus. Neuropsychologia 42, 1017–1028. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.01.002 PubMed DOI

Squire L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychol. Rev. 99, 195–231. 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 PubMed DOI

Stern C. E., Corkin S., Gonzalez R. G., Guimaraes A. R., Baker J. R., Jennings P. J., et al. . (1996). The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 93, 8660–8665. 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8660 PubMed DOI PMC

Suzuki W. A., Amaral D. G. (1994). Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices. J. Neurosci. 14, 1856–1877. PubMed PMC

Talairach J., Tournoux P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain New York: Thieme.

Tulving E., Markowitsch H. J. (1998). Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 8, 198–204. 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1998)8:3<198::aid-hipo2>3.3.co;2-j PubMed DOI

Van Hoesen G. W. (1982). The parahippocampal gyrus. New observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey. Trends Neurosci. 5, 345–350. 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90201-6 DOI

Vargha-Khadem F., Gadian D. G., Watkins K. E., Connelly A., Van Paesschen W., Mishkin M. (1997). Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science 277, 376–380. 10.1126/science.277.5324.376 PubMed DOI

Watson P. D., Voss J. L., Warren D. E., Tranel D., Cohen N. J. (2013). Spatial reconstruction by patients with hippocampal damage is dominated by relational memory errors. Hippocampus 23, 570–580. 10.1002/hipo.22115 PubMed DOI PMC

Weniger G., Siemerkus J., Schmidt-Samoa C., Mehlitz M., Baudewig J., Dechent P., et al. . (2010). The human parahippocampal cortex subserves egocentric spatial learning during navigation in a virtual maze. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 93, 46–55. 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.08.003 PubMed DOI

White N. M., McDonald R. J. (2002). Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 77, 125–184. 10.1006/nlme.2001.4008 PubMed DOI

Worsley K. J., Liao C. H., Aston J., Petre V., Duncan G. H., Morales F., et al. . (2002). A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. Neuroimage 15, 1–15. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0933 PubMed DOI