Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Observational Study
PubMed
26350987
DOI
10.5301/ejo.5000653
PII: 589F40CA-72CD-40F8-9BBA-5E3FC62CEAE7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Accommodation, Ocular physiology MeSH
- Eyeglasses MeSH
- Phacoemulsification * MeSH
- Lens Implantation, Intraocular * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lenses, Intraocular * MeSH
- Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Pseudophakia physiopathology MeSH
- Registries * MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Patient Satisfaction MeSH
- Vision, Binocular physiology MeSH
- Visual Acuity physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 ± 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 ± 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 ± 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 ± 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 ± 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.
References provided by Crossref.org