Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study

. 2016 Jun ; 100 (6) : 787-95. [epub] 20151009

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26453639
Odkazy

PubMed 26453639
PubMed Central PMC4893084
DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307249
PII: bjophthalmol-2015-307249
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

AIMS: To demonstrate non-inferiority of ranibizumab treat-and-extend (T&E) with/without laser to ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: A 24-month single-masked study with patients randomised 1:1:1 to T&E+laser (n=121), T&E (n=128) or PRN (control; n=123). All patients received monthly injections until BCVA stabilisation. The investigator decided on re-treatment in the PRN and treatment-interval adaptations in the T&E groups based on loss of BCVA stability due to DMO activity. Likewise, laser treatment was at investigator's discretion. Collectively, these features reflect a real-life scenario. Endpoints included mean average change in BCVA from baseline to months 1-12 (primary), mean BCVA change from baseline to months 12 and 24, treatment exposure and safety profile. RESULTS: Both T&E regimens were non-inferior to PRN based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to months 1-12 (T&E+laser: +5.9 and T&E: +6.1 vs PRN: +6.2 letters; both p<0.0001). Mean BCVA change at month 24 was similar across groups (+8.3, +6.5 and +8.1 letters, respectively). The mean number of injections was 12.4 and 12.8 in the T&E+laser and T&E groups and 10.7 in the PRN group. The T&E regimens showed 46% reduction in the number of clinic visits. Over 70% of patients maintained their BCVA, with treatment intervals of ≥2 months over 24 months. Safety profile was consistent with that described in the product information. CONCLUSIONS: T&E is a feasible treatment option for patients with DMO, with a potential to reduce treatment burden. Slightly more injections were required versus PRN, likely due to the specifics of the T&E regimen applied here. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01171976.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Visual impairment in diabetes. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1–9. PubMed

Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1227–39. 10.1056/NEJMra1005073 PubMed DOI

Chen E, Looman M, Laouri M, et al. . Burden of illness of diabetic macular edema: literature review. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:1587–97. 10.1185/03007995.2010.482503 PubMed DOI

Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. . The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2011;118:615–25. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.031 PubMed DOI

Lang GE, Berta A, Eldem BM, et al. . Two-year safety and efficacy of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in diabetic macular edema: Interim analysis of the RESTORE Extension Study. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2004–12. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.019 PubMed DOI

Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Holz FG, et al. . Three-year outcomes of individualized ranibizumab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: the RESTORE Extension study. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1045–53. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.041 PubMed DOI

Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Qin H, et al. , Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2011;118:609–14. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033 PubMed DOI PMC

Elman MJ, Qin H, Aiello LP, et al. , Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: three-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2312–18. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022 PubMed DOI PMC

Elman MJ, Ayala A, Bressler NM, et al. . Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology 2015;122:375–81. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047 PubMed DOI PMC

Spaide RF. Ranibizumab according to need: a treatment for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:679–80. 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.024 PubMed DOI

Gupta OP, Shienbaum G, Patel AH, et al. . A treat and extend regimen using ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinical and economic impact. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2134–40. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.032 PubMed DOI

Abedi F, Wickremasinghe S, Islam AF, et al. . Anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a treat-and-extend protocol over 2 years. Retina 2014;34:1531–8. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000134 PubMed DOI

Rayess N, Houston SK III, Gupta OP, et al. . Treatment outcomes after 3 years in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a treat-and-extend regimen. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159:3–8. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.011 PubMed DOI

Berg K, Pedersen TR, Sandvik L, et al. . Comparison of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to LUCAS treat-and-extend protocol. Ophthalmology 2015;122:146–52. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.041 PubMed DOI

Oubraham H, Cohen SY, Samimi S, et al. . Inject and extend dosing versus dosing as needed: a comparative retrospective study of ranibizumab in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2011;31:26–30. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181de5609 PubMed DOI

Pearce I, Banerjee S, Burton BJ, et al. . Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for Diabetic Macular Edema with Bimonthly Monitoring after a Phase of Initial Treatment: 18-Month, Multicenter, Phase IIIB RELIGHT Study. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1811–19. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.038 PubMed DOI

European Medicines Agency. Lucentis: EPAR-Product Information. EMEA/H/C/000715-IB/0032. Updated 20 July, 2012. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000715/WC500043546.pdf (accessed 15 May 2015).

Bhagat N, Grigorian RA, Tutela A, et al. . Diabetic Macular Edema: pathogenesis and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:1–32. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.10.001 PubMed DOI

Bretz F, Maurer W, Brannath W, et al. . A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Stat Med 2009;28:586–604. 10.1002/sim.3495 PubMed DOI

Toalster N, Russell M, Ng P. A 12-month prospective trial of inject and extend regimen for ranibizumab treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2013;33:1351–8. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182831265 PubMed DOI

Do DV, Nguyen QD, Khwaja AA, et al. , for the READ-2 Study Group. Ranibizumab for oedema of the macula in diabetes study: 3-year outcomes and the need for prolonged frequent treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:139–45. 10.1001/2013.jamaophthalmol.91 PubMed DOI

Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, et al. . The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1464–74. PubMed

Mercer BN, Morais S, Cubbon RM, et al. . Diabetes mellitus and the heart. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:640–7. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02924.x PubMed DOI

European Medicines Agency. Summary of Product Characteristics. Lucentis 10 mg/ml solution for injection. Novartis 2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000715/WC500043546.pdfhttp://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000715/WC500043546.pdf (accessed 15 May 2015).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01171976

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...