Possibility to predict early postpartum glucose abnormality following gestational diabetes mellitus based on the results of routine mid-gestational screening
Jazyk angličtina Země Chorvatsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26526166
PubMed Central
PMC4622188
DOI
10.11613/bm.2015.047
PII: bm-25-460
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- diagnosis, gestational diabetes, glucose intolerance, oral glucose tolerance test, postpartum period,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- druhý trimestr těhotenství krev MeSH
- gestační diabetes diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- glukózový toleranční test * MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin analýza MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náchylnost k nemoci MeSH
- omezení příjmu potravy krev MeSH
- plocha pod křivkou MeSH
- porucha glukózové tolerance diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- poruchy v puerperiu diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- ROC křivka MeSH
- screeningové krevní testy v těhotenství * MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- glykovaný hemoglobin MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have increased risk of developing glucose abnormality, but current diagnostic criteria are evidence-based for adverse pregnancy outcome. THE AIMS OF OUR STUDY WERE: (i) to ascertain a frequency of early conversion of GDM into permanent glucose abnormality, (ii) to determine predictive potential of current GDM diagnostic criteria for prediction of postpartum glucose abnormality and (iii) to find optimal cut-off values of oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) to stratify GDM population according to postpartum risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of an ethnically homogenous cohort of women diagnosed and treated for GDM in a single medical centre during the period 2005-2011 who completed postpartum oGTT up to 1 year after the index delivery were retrospectively analysed (N=305). RESULTS: Postpartum glucose abnormality was detected in 16.7% subjects. Mid-trimester oGTT values, respective area under the curve and HbA1c were significantly associated with early postpartum glucose abnormality (P<0.05, Mann-Whitney) and exhibited significant predictive potential for postpartum glucose abnormality risk assessment. Optimal cut-off values for discrimination of at-risk sub-population were identified using ROC analysis and their comparison with WHO and IADPSG criteria exhibited superiority of IADPSG for risk-stratification of GDM population. CONCLUSION: Risk-based stratification at the time of GDM diagnosis could improve efficiency of the post-gestational screening for diabetes. IADPSG criteria seem to optimally capture both perinatal and maternal metabolic risks and are therefore medically and economically justified.
Department of Pathophysiology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Recommendations 2001. Diabetes Care. 2001;24 Suppl 1:S1–133. 10.2337/diacare.24.1.1 PubMed DOI
Newbern D, Freemark M. Placental hormones and the control of maternal metabolism and fetal growth. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011;18:409–16. 10.1097/MED.0b013e32834c800d PubMed DOI
Reece EA, Leguizamón G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet. 2009;373:1789–97. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60515-8 PubMed DOI
Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 PubMed DOI
Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82. 10.2337/dc10-0719 PubMed DOI PMC
Weinert LS. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: comment to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Diabetes Care. 2010;7:e97; author reply e98. 10.2337/dc10-0544 PubMed DOI PMC
Lovrencić MV, Honović L, Kralik S, Matica J, Prasek M, Pape-Medvidović E, et al. Redefinition of gestational diabetes mellitus: implications for laboratory practice in Croatia. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23:7–11. 10.11613/BM.2013.002 PubMed DOI PMC
Krejčí H, Anderlova K. Why do we still hesitate to accept the new international criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus? The current screening is non-uniform and does not correspond with evidence-based medicine. Ceska Gynekol. 2014;79:206–12. [in Czech] PubMed
Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1862–8. 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862 PubMed DOI
Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:1773–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5 PubMed DOI
Hunt KJ, Logan SL, Conway DL, Korte JE. Postpartum screening following GDM: how well are we doing? Curr Diab Rep. 2010;10:235–41. 10.1007/s11892-010-0110-x PubMed DOI
Keely E. An opportunity not to be missed--how do we improve postpartum screening rates for women with gestational diabetes? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28:312–6. 10.1002/dmrr.2274 PubMed DOI
Friedecký B, Zima T, Kratochvíla J, Springer D. [Diabetes mellitus - laboratorní diagnostika a sledování stavu pacientů]. 2005. Available at: http://www.cskb.cz/res/file/doporuceni/DM_verze%202012.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2015. (in Czech)
Reinauer H, Home P, Kanabasagapathy A, Heuck C-C. Laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus. In: World Health Organization 2002.
Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990;300:230–5. 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230 PubMed DOI PMC
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45. 10.2307/2531595 PubMed DOI
Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–5. 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 PubMed DOI
Retnakaran R. Glucose tolerance status in pregnancy: a window to the future risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in young women. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2009;5:239–44. 10.2174/157339909789804378 PubMed DOI
Kim C, Herman WH, Vijan S. Efficacy and cost of postpartum screening strategies for diabetes among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1102–6. 10.2337/dc06-2237 PubMed DOI
Saaristo T, Moilanen L, Korpi-Hyövälti E, Vanhala M, Saltevo J, Niskanen L, et al. Lifestyle intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary health care: one-year follow-up of the Finnish National Diabetes Prevention Program (FIN-D2D). Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2146–51. 10.2337/dc10-0410 PubMed DOI PMC
Wein P, Beischer NA, Sheedy MT. Studies of postnatal diabetes mellitus in women who had gestational diabetes. Part 2. Prevalence and predictors of diabetes mellitus after delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;37:420–3. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1997.tb02450.x PubMed DOI
Schaefer-Graf UM, Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL. Clinical predictors for a high risk for the development of diabetes mellitus in the early puerperium in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:751–6. 10.1067/mob.2002.121895 PubMed DOI
Akinci B, Celtik A, Genc S, Yener S, Demir T, Secil M, et al. Evaluation of postpartum carbohydrate intolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in women with gestational diabetes. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:361–7. 10.3109/09513590.2010.492885 PubMed DOI
Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Hanley AJ, Zinman B. Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and future risk of pre-diabetes or diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2026–31. 10.2337/dc08-0972 PubMed DOI PMC
Ekelund M, Shaat N, Almgren P, Groop L, Berntorp K. Prediction of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2010;53:452–7. 10.1007/s00125-009-1621-3 PubMed DOI
Saisho Y, Miyakoshi K, Tanaka M, Matsumoto T, Minegishi K, Yoshimura Y, et al. Antepartum oral disposition index as a predictor of glucose intolerance postpartum. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:e32. 10.2337/dc11-2549 PubMed DOI PMC
Rasmussen SS, Glümer C, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Carstensen B, Borch-Johnsen K. Short-term reproducibility of impaired fasting glycaemia, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes The ADDITION study, DK. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80:146–52. 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.11.003 PubMed DOI
Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Zinman B, Hanley AJ. Comparison of National Diabetes Data Group and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in their identification of postpartum risk of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;85:40–6. 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.008 PubMed DOI
Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Hanley AJ, Zinman B. The antepartum glucose values that predict neonatal macrosomia differ from those that predict postpartum prediabetes or diabetes: implications for the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:840–5. 10.1210/jc.2008-2434 PubMed DOI PMC
Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:768–73. PubMed