Infliximab Reduces Endoscopic, but Not Clinical, Recurrence of Crohn's Disease After Ileocolonic Resection
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
26946343
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.072
PII: S0016-5085(16)00293-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Anti-TNF, CDAI, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, PREVENT,
- MeSH
- Crohn Disease drug therapy pathology surgery MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Gastrointestinal Agents administration & dosage MeSH
- Ileum pathology surgery MeSH
- Infliximab administration & dosage MeSH
- Colectomy adverse effects MeSH
- Colon pathology surgery MeSH
- Colonoscopy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Postoperative Period MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Secondary Prevention methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Gastrointestinal Agents MeSH
- Infliximab MeSH
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most patients with Crohn's disease (CD) eventually require an intestinal resection. However, CD frequently recurs after resection. We performed a randomized trial to compare the ability of infliximab vs placebo to prevent CD recurrence. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of infliximab in preventing postoperative recurrence of CD in 297 patients at 104 sites worldwide from November 2010 through May 2012. All study patients had undergone ileocolonic resection within 45 days before randomization. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo every 8 weeks for 200 weeks. The primary end point was clinical recurrence, defined as a composite outcome consisting of a CD Activity Index score >200 and a ≥70-point increase from baseline, and endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2, determined by a central reader) or development of a new or re-draining fistula or abscess, before or at week 76. Endoscopic recurrence was a major secondary end point. RESULTS: A smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had a clinical recurrence before or at week 76 compared with the placebo group, but this difference was not statistically significant (12.9% vs 20.0%; absolute risk reduction [ARR] with infliximab, 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 15.5%; P = .097). A significantly smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had endoscopic recurrence compared with the placebo group (30.6% vs 60.0%; ARR with infliximab, 29.4%; 95% confidence interval: 18.6% to 40.2%; P < .001). Additionally, a significantly smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had endoscopic recurrence based only on Rutgeerts scores ≥i2 (22.4% vs 51.3%; ARR with infliximab, 28.9%; 95% confidence interval: 18.4% to 39.4%; P < .001). Patients previously treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or those with more than 1 resection were at greater risk for clinical recurrence. The safety profile of infliximab was similar to that from previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is not superior to placebo in preventing clinical recurrence after CD-related resection. However, infliximab does reduce endoscopic recurrence. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01190839.
Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Milan Italy
Janssen Research and Development LLC Spring House Pennsylvania
Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC Horsham Pennsylvania
MSD International Luzern Switzerland
Robarts Research Institute University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada
S Orsola Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01190839