We have examined the imprecision in the estimation of PCR efficiency by means of standard curves based on strategic experimental design with large number of technical replicates. In particular, how robust this estimation is in terms of a commonly varying factors: the instrument used, the number of technical replicates performed and the effect of the volume transferred throughout the dilution series. We used six different qPCR instruments, we performed 1-16 qPCR replicates per concentration and we tested 2-10 μl volume of analyte transferred, respectively. We find that the estimated PCR efficiency varies significantly across different instruments. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we find the uncertainty in the PCR efficiency estimation may be as large as 42.5% (95% CI) if standard curve with only one qPCR replicate is used in 16 different plates. Based on our investigation we propose recommendations for the precise estimation of PCR efficiency: (1) one robust standard curve with at least 3-4 qPCR replicates at each concentration shall be generated, (2) the efficiency is instrument dependent, but reproducibly stable on one platform, and (3) using a larger volume when constructing serial dilution series reduces sampling error and enables calibration across a wider dynamic range.

Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

Institute of Biotechnology Academy of Science of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic; TATAA Biocenter Gothenburg Sweden

Physiology Weihenstephan TUM Technische Universität München Freising Germany

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Higuchi R. Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotechnology (N Y) 1992;10(4):413–417. PubMed

Kubista M. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27(2–3):95–125. PubMed

Wittwer C.T. Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques. 1997;22(1):130–131. 134–8. PubMed

Hellemans J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R19. PubMed PMC

Pfaffl M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45. PubMed PMC

Boeuf P. CyProQuant-PCR: a real time RT-PCR technique for profiling human cytokines, based on external RNA standards, readily automatable for clinical use. BMC Immunol. 2005;6:5. PubMed PMC

Bustin S.A. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;25(2):169–193. PubMed

Larionov A., Krause A., Miller W. A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:62. PubMed PMC

Stolovitzky G., Cecchi G. Efficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(23):12947–12952. PubMed PMC

Alvarez M.J. Model based analysis of real-time PCR data from DNA binding dye protocols. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:85. PubMed PMC

Lalam N. Estimation of the reaction efficiency in polymerase chain reaction. J Theor Biol. 2006;242(4):947–953. PubMed

Roche . 2000. Overview of LightCycler quantification methods.

AppliedBiosystems . 2004. Amplification efficiency of TaqMan® gene expression assays.

Goll R. Evaluation of absolute quantitation by nonlinear regression in probe-based real-time PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:107. PubMed PMC

Tichopad A. Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(20):e122. PubMed PMC

Bustin S.A. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55(4):611–622. PubMed

Bar T., Kubista M., Tichopad A. Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(4):1395–1406. PubMed PMC

Sisti D. Shape based kinetic outlier detection in real-time PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:186. PubMed PMC

Tichopad A. Quality control for quantitative PCR based on amplification compatibility test. Methods. 2010;50(4):308–312. PubMed

Gevertz J.L., Dunn S.M., Roth C.M. Mathematical model of real-time PCR kinetics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;92(3):346–355. PubMed

Mackay I.M. Horizon Scientific Press; 2007. Real-time PCR in microbiology: from diagnosis to characterization; p. 454.

Raghavachari R., Tan W. SPIE; San Jose, CA: 2001. Genomics and proteomics technologies.

Nolan T. SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem. 2006;351(2):308–310. PubMed

Svec D. Direct cell lysis for single-cell gene expression profiling. Front Oncol. 2013;3:274. PubMed PMC

Stahlberg A. Quantitative real-time PCR method for detection of B-lymphocyte monoclonality by comparison of kappa and lambda immunoglobulin light chain expression. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):51–59. PubMed

Pfaffl M. In: Quantification strategies in real-time PCR, A–Z of quantitative PCR. Bustin S.A., editor. International University Line (IUL); La Jolla, CA, USA: 2004. pp. 87–112.

Good I.J. Statistical science. Institute of Mathematical Statistics; 1986. Some statistical applications of Poisson's work; pp. 157–170.

Peccoud J., Jacob C. Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Biophys J. 1996;71(1):101–108. PubMed PMC

Bengtsson M. Quantification of mRNA in single cells and modelling of RT-qPCR induced noise. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9:63. PubMed PMC

Murphy J., Bustin S.A. Reliability of real-time reverse-transcription PCR in clinical diagnostics: gold standard or substandard? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9(2):187–197. PubMed

Baker S.C. The External RNA Controls Consortium: a progress report. Nat Methods. 2005;2(10):731–734. PubMed

FDA . Food and Drug Administration; 2005. Guidance for industry pharmacogenomic data submissions.

EPA . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water and the Office of Research and Development; 2004. Quality assurance/quality control guidance for laboratories performing PCR analyses on environmental samples.

CLSI . CLSI; 2006. Use of external RNA controls in gene expression assays.

Lavagnini I., Magno F. A statistical overview on univariate calibration, inverse regression, and detection limits: application to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry technique. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2007;26(1):1–18. PubMed

Andrade J.M. Classical linear regression by the least squares method. In: Andrade-Garda J.M., editor. Basic chemometric techniques in atomic spectroscopy. 2nd ed. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013. pp. 52–66.

CLSI . 2003. CLSI document EP6-A: evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures.

CLSI . 2nd ed. 2004. CLSI document EP5-A2: evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods.

Cuthbert D. Calibration designs for machines with carry-over and drift. J Qual Technol. 1975;7(3):103–108.

Kubista M. 2010. When to use interplate calibrator. Available from: http://www.tataa.com/products-page/quality-assessment/tataa-interplate-calibrator/

Recommendations for Method Development and Validation of qPCR and dPCR Assays in Support of Cell and Gene Therapy Drug Development

Different Mechanisms of DNA Radiosensitization by 8-Bromoadenosine and 2'-Deoxy-2'-fluorocytidine Observed on DNA Origami Nanoframe Supports

Detection of sex in adults and larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata on principle of copy number variation

Tutorial: Guidelines for Single-Cell RT-qPCR