Prediction of remission and low disease activity in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with golimumab
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27114562
PubMed Central
PMC4957672
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/kew179
PII: kew179
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- biologic, predictors of response, remission, rheumatoid arthritis, tumour necrosis factor,
- MeSH
- antirevmatika terapeutické užití MeSH
- chronická nemoc MeSH
- indukce remise MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- regresní analýza MeSH
- revmatoidní artritida farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antirevmatika MeSH
- golimumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To create a tool to predict probability of remission and low disease activity (LDA) in patients with RA being considered for anti-TNF treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: We analysed data from GO-MORE, an open-label, multinational, prospective study in biologic-naïve patients with active RA (DAS28-ESR ⩾3.2) despite DMARD therapy. Patients received 50 mg s.c. golimumab (GLM) once monthly for 6 months. In secondary analyses, regression models were used to determine the best set of baseline factors to predict remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at month 6 and LDA (DAS28-ESR ⩽3.2) at month 1. RESULTS: In 3280 efficacy-evaluable patients, of 12 factors included in initial regression models predicting remission or LDA, six were retained in final multivariable models. Greater likelihood of LDA and remission was associated with being male; younger age; lower HAQ, ESR (or CRP) and tender joint count (or swollen joint count) scores; and absence of comorbidities. In models predicting 1-, 3- and 6-month LDA or remission, area under the receiver operating curve was 0.648-0.809 (R(2) = 0.0397-0.1078). The models also predicted 6-month HAQ and EuroQoL-5-dimension scores. A series of matrices were developed to easily show predicted rates of remission and LDA. CONCLUSION: A matrix tool was developed to show predicted GLM treatment outcomes in patients with RA, based on a combination of six baseline characteristics. The tool could help provide practical guidance in selection of candidates for anti-TNF therapy.
Centre de Rhumatologie St Louis Québec Canada
Clinical Development Merck and Co Inc Kenilworth NJ USA
Departement de Rhumatologie Hôpital Lapeyronie Montpellier University Hospital Montpellier France
Department of Immunology MSD Italy Global Medical Affairs Rome Italy
Department of Medical Affairs MSD Danmark ApS Ballerup Denmark
Department of Rheumatology AGAR Francisco Marroquin University Guatemala City Guatemala
Department of Rheumatology Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica São Paulo Brazil
Department of Rheumatology Clinical Sciences Centre University Hospital Aintree Liverpool UK
Department of Rheumatology Klinik für Rheumatologie Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek Hamburg Germany
Department of Rheumatology Southend University Hospital Westcliff on Sea Essex UK
Department of Rheumatology Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels Belgium
Institute of Rheumatology and Clinic of Rheumatology Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Instituto de Asistencia Reumatologica Integral Buenos Aires Argentina
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Callaghan CA, Boyter AC, Mullen AB, McRorie ER. Biological therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: is personalised medicine possible? Eur J Hosp Pharm 2014;21:229–37.
Katchamart W, Johnson S, Lin HJ. et al. Predictors for remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:1128–43. PubMed
Radner H, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Impact of comorbidity on physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:536–41. PubMed
Hetland ML, Christensen IJ, Tarp U. et al. Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the Nationwide Danish DANBIO Registry. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:22–32. PubMed
Radovits BJ, Kievit W, Fransen J. et al. Influence of age on the outcome of anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1470–3. PubMed
Barnabe C, Homik J, Barr SG, Martin L, Maksymowych WP. The effect of different remission definitions on identification of predictors of both point and sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy. J Rheumatol 2014;41:1607–13. PubMed
Hyrich KL, Watson KD, Silman AJ, Symmons DP. Predictors of response to anti-TNF-alpha therapy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology biologics register. Rheumatology 2006;45:1558–65. PubMed
Mattey DL, Brownfield A, Dawes PT. Relationship between pack-year history of smoking and response to tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1180–7. PubMed
Mancarella L, Bobbio-Pallavicini F, Ceccarelli C. et al. Good clinical response, remission, and predictors of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α blockers: the GISEA study. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1670–3. PubMed
Kristensen LE, Kapetanovic MC, Gulfe A. et al. Predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy according to ACR and EULAR criteria in patients with established RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register. Rheumatology 2008;47:495–9. PubMed
Listing J, Strangfeld A, Rau R. et al. Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low—results from RABBIT, the German Biologics Register. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R66. PubMed PMC
Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:492–509. PubMed PMC
Combe B, Dasgupta B, Louw I. et al. Efficacy and safety of golimumab as add-on therapy to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: results of the GO-MORE study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1477–86. PubMed PMC
Vastesaeger N, van der Heijde D, Inman RD. et al. Predicting the outcome of ankylosing spondylitis therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:973–81. PubMed PMC
Vander CB, Van Looy S, Wyns B. et al. DAS28 best reflects the physician's clinical judgment of response to infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: validation of the DAS28 score in patients under infliximab treatment. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7:R1063–71. PubMed PMC
Radner H, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: benefit over low disease activity in patient-reported outcomes and costs. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R56. PubMed PMC
Ohinmaa AE, Thanh NX, Barnabe C. et al. Canadian estimates of health care utilization costs for rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without therapy with biologic agents. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:1319–27. PubMed
Kavanaugh A, Lee SJ, Curtis JR. et al. Discontinuation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low-disease activity: persistent benefits. Data from the Corrona registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1150–5. PubMed
Burmester GR, Ferraccioli G, Flipo RM. et al. Clinical remission and/or minimal disease activity in patients receiving adalimumab treatment in a multinational, open-label, twelve-week study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:32–41. PubMed
Dasgupta B, Combe B, Louw I. et al. Patient and physician expectations of add-on treatment with golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: relationships between expectations and clinical and quality of life outcomes. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:1799–807. PubMed