Comparison of different tissue clearing methods and 3D imaging techniques for visualization of GFP-expressing mouse embryos and embryonic hearts

. 2016 Aug ; 146 (2) : 141-52. [epub] 20160504

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27145961
Odkazy

PubMed 27145961
DOI 10.1007/s00418-016-1441-8
PII: 10.1007/s00418-016-1441-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Our goal was to find an optimal tissue clearing protocol for whole-mount imaging of embryonic and adult hearts and whole embryos of transgenic mice that would preserve green fluorescent protein GFP fluorescence and permit comparison of different currently available 3D imaging modalities. We tested various published organic solvent- or water-based clearing protocols intended to preserve GFP fluorescence in central nervous system: tetrahydrofuran dehydration and dibenzylether protocol (DBE), SCALE, CLARITY, and CUBIC and evaluated their ability to render hearts and whole embryos transparent. DBE clearing protocol did not preserve GFP fluorescence; in addition, DBE caused considerable tissue-shrinking artifacts compared to the gold standard BABB protocol. The CLARITY method considerably improved tissue transparency at later stages, but also decreased GFP fluorescence intensity. The SCALE clearing resulted in sufficient tissue transparency up to ED12.5; at later stages the useful depth of imaging was limited by tissue light scattering. The best method for the cardiac specimens proved to be the CUBIC protocol, which preserved GFP fluorescence well, and cleared the specimens sufficiently even at the adult stages. In addition, CUBIC decolorized the blood and myocardium by removing tissue iron. Good 3D renderings of whole fetal hearts and embryos were obtained with optical projection tomography and selective plane illumination microscopy, although at resolutions lower than with a confocal microscope. Comparison of five tissue clearing protocols and three imaging methods for study of GFP mouse embryos and hearts shows that the optimal method depends on stage and level of detail required.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):541-5 PubMed

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33916 PubMed

Circ Res. 2000 Nov 10;87(10 ):888-95 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug 30;14(11):1481-8 PubMed

Biotechniques. 2015 Nov 01;59(5):295-308 PubMed

Nat Methods. 2013 Jul;10(7):598-9 PubMed

Nat Protoc. 2012 Nov;7(11):1983-95 PubMed

Cardiovasc Res. 2012 Sep 1;95(4):469-79 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1518-29 PubMed

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 Aug 15;309(4):H702-10 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2013 Aug;16(8):1154-61 PubMed

Cell. 2014 Nov 6;159(4):911-24 PubMed

Cytometry. 1998 Nov 1;33(3):348-54 PubMed

Anaesthesia. 2015 Aug;70(8):939-47 PubMed

Curr Biol. 1998 Feb 26;8(5):295-8 PubMed

Anat Embryol (Berl). 2000 Aug;202(2):103-18 PubMed

Microsc Res Tech. 2009 Feb;72(2):110-9 PubMed

Nature. 2013 May 16;497(7449):332-7 PubMed

Nat Protoc. 2014 Jul;9(7):1682-97 PubMed

Anat Rec. 2000 Oct 1;260(2):148-57 PubMed

Anat Rec. 1997 Jul;248(3):421-32 PubMed

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009 Jan;292(1):12-22 PubMed

Microsc Microanal. 2005 Jun;11(3):216-23 PubMed

Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Jul 1;63(1):77-86 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace