People can accurately assess various personality traits of others based on body odor (BO) alone. Previous studies have shown that correlations between odor ratings and self-assessed personality dimensions are evident for assessments of neuroticism and dominance. Here, we tested differences between assessments based on natural body odor alone, without the use of cosmetics and assessments based on the body odor of people who were allowed to use cosmetics following their daily routine. Sixty-seven observers assessed samples of odors from 113 odor donors (each odor donor provided two samples - one with and one without cosmetic use); the donors provided their personality ratings, and the raters judged personality characteristics of the donors based on the provided odor samples. Correlations between observers' ratings and self-rated neuroticism were stronger when raters assessed body odor in the natural body odor condition (natural BO condition; r s = 0.20) than in the cosmetics use condition (BO+cosmetics condition; r s = 0.15). Ratings of dominance significantly predicted self-assessed dominance in both conditions (r s = 0.34 for natural BO and r s = 0.21 for BO+cosmetics), whereas ratings of extraversion did not predict self-assessed extraversion in either condition. In addition, ratings of body odor attractiveness and pleasantness were significantly lower in natural BO condition than in BO+cosmetics condition, although the intensity of donors' body odors was similar under both conditions. Our findings suggest that although olfaction seems to contribute to accurate first impression judgments of certain personality traits, cosmetic use can affect assessments of others based on body odor.

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles UniversityPrague Czech Republic; National Institute of Mental HealthKlecany Czech Republic

Institute of Psychology University of Wroclaw Wroclaw Poland

Smell and Taste Clinic Department of Otorhinolaryngology TU DresdenDresden Germany; Institute of Psychology University of WroclawWroclaw Poland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ackerl K., Atzmueller M., Grammer K. (2002). The scent of fear. Neuro. Endocrinol. Lett. 23 79–84. PubMed

Allen C., Havlíček J., Roberts S. C. (2015). Effect of fragrance use on discrimination of individual body odour. Front. Psychol. 6:1115 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01115 PubMed DOI PMC

Baron R. A. (1981). Olfaction and human social-behavior—effects of a pleasant scent on attraction and social-perception. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 7 611–616. 10.1177/014616728174016 DOI

Baron R. A. (1983). ‘Sweet smell of success?’ The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicants. J. Appl. Psychol. 68 709–713. 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.709 DOI

Baron R. A. (1986). Self-presentation in job interviews: when there can be “too much of a good thing”. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16 16–28. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb02275.x DOI

Cashdan E. (1995). Hormones, sex, and status in women. Horm. Behav. 29 354–366. 10.1006/hbeh.1995.1025 PubMed DOI

Chen D., Haviland-Jones J. (2000). Human olfactory communication of emotion. Percept. Mot. Skills 91 771–781. 10.2466/pms.2000.91.3.771 PubMed DOI

Dalton P., Mauté C., Jaén C., Wilson T. (2013). Chemosignals of stress influence social judgments. PLoS ONE 8:e77144 10.1371/journal.pone.0077144 PubMed DOI PMC

Dematte M. L., Österbauer R., Spence C. (2007). Olfactory cues modulate facial attractiveness. Chem. Senses 32 603–610. 10.1093/chemse/bjm030 PubMed DOI

Doty R. L., Cameron E. L. (2009). Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol. Behav. 97 213–228. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.032 PubMed DOI PMC

Doty R. L., Orndorff M. M., Leyden J., Kligman A. (1978). Communication of gender from human axillary odors: relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behav. Biol. 23 373–380. 10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91393-7 PubMed DOI

Fialová J., Havlíček J. (2012). Perception of emotion-related odours in humans. Anthropologie. 50 95–110.

Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., Swann W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37 504–528. 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 DOI

Gray A., Feldman H. A., Mckinlay J. B., Longcope C. (1991). Age, disease, and changing sex hormone levels in middle-aged men: results of the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 73 1016–1025. 10.1210/jcem-73-5-1016 PubMed DOI

Havlíček J., Lenochová P., Oberzaucher E., Grammer K., Roberts S. C. (2011). Does length of sampling affects quality of body odor samples? Chemosens. Percept. 4 186–194. 10.1007/s12078-011-9104-6 DOI

Havlicek J., Roberts S. C., Flegr J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol. Letters 1 256–259. 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332 PubMed DOI PMC

Havlicek J., Saxton T. K., Roberts S. C., Jozifkova E., Lhota S., Valentova J., et al. (2008). He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts. Pers. Individ. Dif. 45 565–570. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.02.004 DOI

Higuchi T., Shoji K., Taguchi S., Hatayama T. (2005). Improvement of nonverbal behaviour in Japanese female perfume-wearers. Int. J. Psychol. 40 90–99. 10.1080/00207590444000050 DOI

Hold B., Schleidt M. (1977). The importance of human odour in non-verbal communication. Z. Tierpsychol. 43 225–238. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00072.x PubMed DOI

Kohoutová D., Rubešová A., Havlíček J. (2012). Shaving of axillary hair has only a transient effect on perceived body odor pleasantness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66 569–581. 10.1007/s00265-011-1305-0 DOI

Konstabel K., Aavik T., Allik J. (2006). Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. Eur. J. Pers. 20 549–566. 10.1002/per.593 DOI

Lenochova P., Roberts S. C., Havlicek J. (2009). Methods in body odour sampling: The effect of sampling length. Chem. Senses 34 127–138. 10.1093/chemse/bjn067 PubMed DOI

Lenochová P., Vohnoutová P., Roberts S. C., Oberzaucher E., Grammer K., Havlíček J. (2012). Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice. PLoS ONE 7:e33810 10.1371/journal.pone.0033810 PubMed DOI PMC

Marinova R., Moss M. (2014). The smell of success?—The impact of perfume-gender congruency on ratings of attraction and the halo effect. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 4:50543 10.4236/aces.2014.44051 DOI

McBurney D. H., Levine J. M., Cavanaugh P. H. (1976). Psychophysical and social ratings of human body odor. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 3 135–138. 10.1177/014616727600300126 DOI

Milinski M., Wedekind C. (2001). Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. Behav. Ecol. 12 140–149. 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2011.00696.x DOI

Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D. (1977). The halo effect: evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35 250–256. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 DOI

Oosterhof N. N., Todorov A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 11087–11092. 10.1073/pnas.0805664105 PubMed DOI PMC

Roberts C. S., Little A. C., Lyndon A., Roberts J., Havlicek J., Wright R. L. (2009). Manipulation of body odour alters men’s self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci. 31 47–54. 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00477.x PubMed DOI

Roberts S. C., Gosling L. M., Carter V., Petrie M. (2008). MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275 2715–2722. 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 PubMed DOI PMC

Roberts S. C., Petrie M., Havlíček J. (2013). Repeatability of body odor preferences across time. Flavour Frag. J. 28 245–250. 10.1002/ffj.3142 DOI

Schleidt M. (1980). Personal odor and nonverbal-communication. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1 225–231. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02413.x DOI

Schleidt M., Hold B., Attili G. (1981). A cross-cultural-study on the attitude towards personal odors. J. Chem. Ecol. 7 19–31. 10.1007/BF00988632 PubMed DOI

Sczesny S., Stahlberg D. (2002). The influence of gender-stereotyped perfumes on leadership attribution. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32 815–828. 10.1002/ejsp.123 DOI

Sorokowska A. (2013a). Assessing personality on the basis of body odor: differences between children and adults. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37 153–163. 10.1007/s10919-013-0152-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Sorokowska A. (2013b). Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli. Pers. Individ. Dif. 55 175–179. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026 DOI

Sorokowska A., Słowińska A., Zbieg A., Sorokowski P. (2014). Polska adaptacja testu Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)–TIPI-PL–wersja standardowa i internetowa. Wroclaw: Wroclab.

Sorokowska A., Sorokowski P., Szmajke A. (2012). Does personality smell? Accuracy of personality assessments based on body odour. Eur. J. Pers. 26 496–503. 10.1002/per.848 DOI

Toncar M., Fetscherin M. (2012). A study of visual puffery in fragrance advertising: is the message sent stronger than the actual scent? Eur. J. Market. 46 52–72. 10.1108/03090561211189239 DOI

Zuckerman M. (1995). Good and bad humors: biochemical bases of personality and its disorders. Psychol. Sci. 6 325–332. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00521.x DOI

Emotional expression in human odour

Losing stinks! The effect of competition outcome on body odour quality