Body odour may provide significant cues about a potential sexual partner's genetic quality, reproductive status and health. In animals, a key trait in a female's choice of sexual partner is male dominance but, to date, this has not been examined in humans. Here, we show that women in the fertile phase of their cycle prefer body odour of males who score high on a questionnaire-based dominance scale (international personality items pool). In accordance with the theory of mixed mating strategies, this preference varies with relationship status, being much stronger in fertile women in stable relationships than in fertile single women.

Department of Anthropology Faculty of Humanities Charles University Husnikova 2075 155 00 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ackerl K, Atzmueller M, Grammer K. The scent of fear. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2002;23:79–84. PubMed

Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Küpper C, Cuthill I.C, Kis J, Lanctot R.B, Sandercock B.K, Székely T, Wallander K, Kempenaers B. Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature. 2002;419:613–615. PubMed

Chen D, Haviland-Jones J. Human olfactory communication of emotion. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2000;91:771–781. PubMed

Doty R.L, Snyder P.J, Huggins G.R, Lowry L.D. Endocrine, cardiovascular, and psychological correlates of olfactory sensitivity changes during menstrual-cycle. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1981;98:45–60. PubMed

Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld J.T, Kempenaers B. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature. 2003;425:714–717. PubMed

Folstad I, Karter A.J. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am. Nat. 1992;139:603–622.

Gangestad S.W, Simpson J.A. The evolution of human mating: trade-off and strategic pluralism. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000;23:573–644. PubMed

Gangestad S.W, Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1998;265:927–933. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0380 PubMed DOI PMC

Goldberg L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I, Deary I, De Fruyt F, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality psychology in Europe. Tilburg University Press; Tilburg, The Netherlands: 1999. pp. 7–28.

Gosling L.M, Roberts S.C. Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv. Stud. Behav. 2001;30:169–217.

Gower D.B, Bird S, Sharma P, House F.R. Axillary 5 alpha-androst-16-en-3-one in men and women: relationships with olfactory acuity to odorous 16-androstenes. Experientia. 1985;41:1134–1136. PubMed

Grammer K. 5-α-androst-16en-3α-on: a male pheromone? A brief report. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1993;14:201–208.

Hummel T, Gollisch R, Wildt G, Kobal G. Changes in olfactory perception during the menstrual cycle. Experientia. 1991;47:712–715. PubMed

Jacob S, McClintock M.K, Zelano B, Ober C. Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:175–179. PubMed

Johnston V.S, Hagel R, Franklin M, Fink B, Grammer K. Male facial attractiveness. Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2001;22:251–267.

Kruczek M. Male rank and female choice in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Behav. Processes. 1997;40:171–176. PubMed

Little A.C, Jones B.C, Penton-Voak I.S, Burt D.M, Perrett D.I. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2002;269:1095–1100. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1984 PubMed DOI PMC

Mossman C.A, Drickamer L.C. Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J. Comp. Psychol. 1996;110:131–138. PubMed

Mueller U, Mazur A. Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality. Behav. Ecol. 1997;8:569–579.

Neave N, Laing S, Fink B, Manning J.T. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2003;270:2167–2172. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2502 PubMed DOI PMC

Penn D.J. The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology. 2002;108:1–21.

Penton-Voak I.S, Perrett D.I. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2000;21:39–48.

Penton-Voak I.S, Perrett D.I, Castles D.L, Kobayashi T, Burt D.M, Murray L.K, Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999;399:741–742. PubMed

Perrett D.I, Lee K.J, Penton-Voak I.S, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt D.M, Henzi S.P, Castles D.L, Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394:884–887. PubMed

Reynolds J.D. Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:68–72. PubMed

Rikowski A, Grammer K. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1999;266:869–874. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0717 PubMed DOI PMC

Swaddle J.P, Reierson G.W. Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2002;269:2285–2289. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2165 PubMed DOI PMC

Thornhill R, Gangestad S.W. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evol. Hum. Behav. 1999;20:175–201.

Thornhill R, Gangestad S.W, Miller R, Scheyd G, McCollough J.K, Franklin M. Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behav. Ecol. 2003;14:668–678.

Waynforth D. Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1998;265:1497–1501. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0463 PubMed DOI PMC

Wedekind C, Füri S. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. B. 1997;264:1471–1479. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 PubMed DOI PMC

Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke A.J. MHC-dependent mate preference in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1995;260:245–249. PubMed

Wilcox A.J, Dunson D, Baird D.D. The timing of the ‘fertile window’ in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. Br. Med. J. 2000;321:1259–1262. PubMed PMC

Losing stinks! The effect of competition outcome on body odour quality

Attractiveness Is Multimodal: Beauty Is Also in the Nose and Ear of the Beholder

Body Odor Based Personality Judgments: The Effect of Fragranced Cosmetics

Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women

Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice