Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
22470479
PubMed Central
PMC3314678
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0033810
PII: PONE-D-11-06687
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- odoranty * MeSH
- parfém * MeSH
- percepce * MeSH
- výběrové chování * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- parfém * MeSH
Cross-culturally, fragrances are used to modulate body odor, but the psychology of fragrance choice has been largely overlooked. The prevalent view is that fragrances mask an individual's body odor and improve its pleasantness. In two experiments, we found positive effects of perfume on body odor perception. Importantly, however, this was modulated by significant interactions with individual odor donors. Fragrances thus appear to interact with body odor, creating an individually-specific odor mixture. In a third experiment, the odor mixture of an individual's body odor and their preferred perfume was perceived as more pleasant than a blend of the same body odor with a randomly-allocated perfume, even when there was no difference in pleasantness between the perfumes. This indicates that fragrance use extends beyond simple masking effects and that people choose perfumes that interact well with their own odor. Our results provide an explanation for the highly individual nature of perfume choice.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Prescott J, Wilkie J. Pain tolerance selectively increased by a sweet-smelling odor. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:308–311. PubMed
Holland RW, Hendriks M, Aarts H. Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:689–693. PubMed
Cornwell RE, Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, et al. Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;271:635–640. PubMed PMC
Li W, Moallem I, Paller KA, Gottfried JA. Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:1044–1049. PubMed
Stoddart DM. The scented ape - The biology and culture of human odour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Classen C, Howes D, Synnott A. Aroma - The cultural history of smell. London and New York: Routledge; 1994.
Anonymous Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. Leffingwell & Associates. 2012. Available: http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10.htm. Accessed 2012 February 2.
Varendi H, Porter RH, Winberg J. Does the newborn baby find the nipple by smell? Lancet. 1994;344:989–990. PubMed
Ackerl K, Atzmueller M, Grammer K. The scent of fear. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002;23:79–84. PubMed
Mujica-Parodi LR, Strey HH, Frederick B, Savoy R, Cox D, et al. Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans. Plos One. 2009;4:e6415. PubMed PMC
Havlicek J, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jozifkova E, Lhota S, et al. He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;45:565–570.
Herz RS, Cahill ED. Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender. Hum Nat. 1997;8:275–286. PubMed
Herz RS, Inzlicht M. Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection - The importance of smell for women. Evol Hum Behav. 2002;23:359–364.
Havlicek J, Roberts SC. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:497–512. PubMed
Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK. The nature of selection on the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Crit Rev Immuno. 1997;17:179–224. PubMed
Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK. MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11260–11264. PubMed PMC
Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998;265:927–933. PubMed PMC
Rikowski A, Grammer K. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;266:869–874. PubMed PMC
Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evol Hum Behav. 1999;20:175–201.
Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Lett. 2005;1:256–259. PubMed PMC
Havlicek J, Bartos L, Dvorakova R, Flegr J. Non-advertised does not mean concealed. Body odour changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology. 2006;112:81–90.
Kuukasjärvi S, Eriksson CJP, Koskela E, Mappes T, Nissinen K, et al. Attractiveness of women's body odors over the menstrual cycle: the role of oral contraceptives and receiver sex. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:579–584.
Miller SL, Maner JL. Scent of a woman. Men's testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:276–283. PubMed
Saxton TK, Lyndon A, Little AC, Roberts SC. Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women's attributions of men's attractiveness. Horm Behav. 2008;54:597–601. PubMed
Berglund H, Lindstrom P, Savic I. Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8269–8274. PubMed PMC
Havlicek J, Murray AK, Saxton TK, Roberts SC. Current issues in the study of androstenes in human chemosignalling. In: Litwack G, editor. Pheromones, Vitamins & Hormones 83. London: Academic Press; 2010. pp. 47–81. PubMed
Largey GP, Watson DR. The sociology of odors. Am J Sociol. 1972;77:1021–1034. PubMed
Graham JA, Jouhar AJ. Cosmetics considered in the context of physical attractiveness – A review. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1980;2:77–101. PubMed
Graham CA, Janssen E, Sanders SA. Effects of fragrance on female sexual arousal and mood across the menstrual cycle. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:76–84. PubMed
Roberts SC, Little AC, Lyndon A, Roberts J, Havlicek J, et al. Manipulation of body odour alters men's self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2009;31:47–54. PubMed
Higuchi T, Shoji K, Taguchi S, Hatayama T. Improvement of nonverbal behaviour in Japanese female perfume-wearers. Int J Psychol. 2005;40:90–99.
Milinski M, Wedekind C. Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. Behav Ecol. 2001;12:140–149.
Schleidt M, Hold B, Attili G. A cross-cultural-study on the attitude towards personal odors. J Chem Ecol. 1981;7:19–31. PubMed
Schleidt M. Personal odor and nonverbal-communication. Ethol Sociobiol. 1980;1:225–231.
Baron RA. Olfaction and human social-behavior – Effects of a pleasant scent on attraction and social perpception. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1981;7:611–616.
Laing DG, Francis GW. The capacity of humans to identify odors in mixtures. Physiol Behav. 1989;46:809–814. PubMed
Livermore A, Laing DG. The influence of chemical complexity on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures. Percept Psychophys. 1998;60:650–661. PubMed
Behan JM, Macmaster AP, Perring KD, Tuck KM. Insight into how skin changes perfume. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;18:237–246. PubMed
Doty RL, Orndorff MM, Leyden J, Kligman A. Communication of gender from human axillary odors: relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behav Biol. 1978;23:373–380. PubMed
Henrich J, McElreath R. Dual-inheritance theory: the evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In: Dunbar RIM, Barrett L, editors. Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 555–570.
Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2006.
Wysocki CJ, Pierce JD, Gilbert AN. Geographic, cross-cultural, and individual variation in human olfaction. In: Getchell TV, Doty RL, Bartoshuk LM, Snow JB, editors. Smell and taste in health and disease. New York: Raven Press; 1991. pp. 287–314.
Ferdenzi C, Schirmer A, Roberts SC, Delplanque S, Porcherot C, et al. Affective dimensions of odor perception: a comparison between Swiss, British and Singaporean populations. Emotion. 2011;11:1168–1181. PubMed
Navarrete-Palacios E, Hudson R, Reyes-Guerrero G, Guevara-Guzman R. Lower olfactory threshold during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol. 2003;63:269–279. PubMed
Lenochova P, Roberts SC, Havlicek J. Methods of human body odor sampling: The effect of freezing. Chem Senses. 2008;34:127–138. PubMed
Havlíček J, Lenochová P, Oberzaucher E, Grammer K, Roberts SC. Does length of sampling affects quality of body odor samples? Chemosens Percept. 2011;4:186–194.
Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
The Context Matters: Women's Experiences of Their Partner's Odor in Intimate and Sexual Encounters
Human Body Odour Composites Are Not Perceived More Positively than the Individual Samples
Body Odor Based Personality Judgments: The Effect of Fragranced Cosmetics
Effect of fragrance use on discrimination of individual body odor