Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice

. 2012 ; 7 (3) : e33810. [epub] 20120328

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22470479

Cross-culturally, fragrances are used to modulate body odor, but the psychology of fragrance choice has been largely overlooked. The prevalent view is that fragrances mask an individual's body odor and improve its pleasantness. In two experiments, we found positive effects of perfume on body odor perception. Importantly, however, this was modulated by significant interactions with individual odor donors. Fragrances thus appear to interact with body odor, creating an individually-specific odor mixture. In a third experiment, the odor mixture of an individual's body odor and their preferred perfume was perceived as more pleasant than a blend of the same body odor with a randomly-allocated perfume, even when there was no difference in pleasantness between the perfumes. This indicates that fragrance use extends beyond simple masking effects and that people choose perfumes that interact well with their own odor. Our results provide an explanation for the highly individual nature of perfume choice.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Prescott J, Wilkie J. Pain tolerance selectively increased by a sweet-smelling odor. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:308–311. PubMed

Holland RW, Hendriks M, Aarts H. Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:689–693. PubMed

Cornwell RE, Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, et al. Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;271:635–640. PubMed PMC

Li W, Moallem I, Paller KA, Gottfried JA. Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:1044–1049. PubMed

Stoddart DM. The scented ape - The biology and culture of human odour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

Classen C, Howes D, Synnott A. Aroma - The cultural history of smell. London and New York: Routledge; 1994.

Anonymous Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. Leffingwell & Associates. 2012. Available: http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10.htm. Accessed 2012 February 2.

Varendi H, Porter RH, Winberg J. Does the newborn baby find the nipple by smell? Lancet. 1994;344:989–990. PubMed

Ackerl K, Atzmueller M, Grammer K. The scent of fear. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002;23:79–84. PubMed

Mujica-Parodi LR, Strey HH, Frederick B, Savoy R, Cox D, et al. Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans. Plos One. 2009;4:e6415. PubMed PMC

Havlicek J, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jozifkova E, Lhota S, et al. He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;45:565–570.

Herz RS, Cahill ED. Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender. Hum Nat. 1997;8:275–286. PubMed

Herz RS, Inzlicht M. Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection - The importance of smell for women. Evol Hum Behav. 2002;23:359–364.

Havlicek J, Roberts SC. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:497–512. PubMed

Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK. The nature of selection on the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Crit Rev Immuno. 1997;17:179–224. PubMed

Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK. MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11260–11264. PubMed PMC

Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998;265:927–933. PubMed PMC

Rikowski A, Grammer K. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;266:869–874. PubMed PMC

Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evol Hum Behav. 1999;20:175–201.

Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Lett. 2005;1:256–259. PubMed PMC

Havlicek J, Bartos L, Dvorakova R, Flegr J. Non-advertised does not mean concealed. Body odour changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology. 2006;112:81–90.

Kuukasjärvi S, Eriksson CJP, Koskela E, Mappes T, Nissinen K, et al. Attractiveness of women's body odors over the menstrual cycle: the role of oral contraceptives and receiver sex. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:579–584.

Miller SL, Maner JL. Scent of a woman. Men's testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:276–283. PubMed

Saxton TK, Lyndon A, Little AC, Roberts SC. Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women's attributions of men's attractiveness. Horm Behav. 2008;54:597–601. PubMed

Berglund H, Lindstrom P, Savic I. Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8269–8274. PubMed PMC

Havlicek J, Murray AK, Saxton TK, Roberts SC. Current issues in the study of androstenes in human chemosignalling. In: Litwack G, editor. Pheromones, Vitamins & Hormones 83. London: Academic Press; 2010. pp. 47–81. PubMed

Largey GP, Watson DR. The sociology of odors. Am J Sociol. 1972;77:1021–1034. PubMed

Graham JA, Jouhar AJ. Cosmetics considered in the context of physical attractiveness – A review. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1980;2:77–101. PubMed

Graham CA, Janssen E, Sanders SA. Effects of fragrance on female sexual arousal and mood across the menstrual cycle. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:76–84. PubMed

Roberts SC, Little AC, Lyndon A, Roberts J, Havlicek J, et al. Manipulation of body odour alters men's self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2009;31:47–54. PubMed

Higuchi T, Shoji K, Taguchi S, Hatayama T. Improvement of nonverbal behaviour in Japanese female perfume-wearers. Int J Psychol. 2005;40:90–99.

Milinski M, Wedekind C. Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. Behav Ecol. 2001;12:140–149.

Schleidt M, Hold B, Attili G. A cross-cultural-study on the attitude towards personal odors. J Chem Ecol. 1981;7:19–31. PubMed

Schleidt M. Personal odor and nonverbal-communication. Ethol Sociobiol. 1980;1:225–231.

Baron RA. Olfaction and human social-behavior – Effects of a pleasant scent on attraction and social perpception. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1981;7:611–616.

Laing DG, Francis GW. The capacity of humans to identify odors in mixtures. Physiol Behav. 1989;46:809–814. PubMed

Livermore A, Laing DG. The influence of chemical complexity on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures. Percept Psychophys. 1998;60:650–661. PubMed

Behan JM, Macmaster AP, Perring KD, Tuck KM. Insight into how skin changes perfume. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;18:237–246. PubMed

Doty RL, Orndorff MM, Leyden J, Kligman A. Communication of gender from human axillary odors: relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behav Biol. 1978;23:373–380. PubMed

Henrich J, McElreath R. Dual-inheritance theory: the evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In: Dunbar RIM, Barrett L, editors. Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 555–570.

Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2006.

Wysocki CJ, Pierce JD, Gilbert AN. Geographic, cross-cultural, and individual variation in human olfaction. In: Getchell TV, Doty RL, Bartoshuk LM, Snow JB, editors. Smell and taste in health and disease. New York: Raven Press; 1991. pp. 287–314.

Ferdenzi C, Schirmer A, Roberts SC, Delplanque S, Porcherot C, et al. Affective dimensions of odor perception: a comparison between Swiss, British and Singaporean populations. Emotion. 2011;11:1168–1181. PubMed

Navarrete-Palacios E, Hudson R, Reyes-Guerrero G, Guevara-Guzman R. Lower olfactory threshold during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol. 2003;63:269–279. PubMed

Lenochova P, Roberts SC, Havlicek J. Methods of human body odor sampling: The effect of freezing. Chem Senses. 2008;34:127–138. PubMed

Havlíček J, Lenochová P, Oberzaucher E, Grammer K, Roberts SC. Does length of sampling affects quality of body odor samples? Chemosens Percept. 2011;4:186–194.

Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...