BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately assess the intelligence of other persons finds its place in everyday social interaction and should have important evolutionary consequences. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used static facial photographs of 40 men and 40 women to test the relationship between measured IQ, perceived intelligence, and facial shape. Both men and women were able to accurately evaluate the intelligence of men by viewing facial photographs. In addition to general intelligence, figural and fluid intelligence showed a significant relationship with perceived intelligence, but again, only in men. No relationship between perceived intelligence and IQ was found for women. We used geometric morphometrics to determine which facial traits are associated with the perception of intelligence, as well as with intelligence as measured by IQ testing. Faces that are perceived as highly intelligent are rather prolonged with a broader distance between the eyes, a larger nose, a slight upturn to the corners of the mouth, and a sharper, pointing, less rounded chin. By contrast, the perception of lower intelligence is associated with broader, more rounded faces with eyes closer to each other, a shorter nose, declining corners of the mouth, and a rounded and massive chin. By contrast, we found no correlation between morphological traits and real intelligence measured with IQ test, either in men or women. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a perceiver can accurately gauge the real intelligence of men, but not women, by viewing their faces in photographs; however, this estimation is possibly not based on facial shape. Our study revealed no relation between intelligence and either attractiveness or face shape.

Department of Philosophy and History of Science Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Burrows AM (2008) The facial expression musculature in primates and its evolutionary significance. Bioessays 30: 212–225. PubMed

Stephen ID, Coetzee V, Perrett DI (2011) Carotenoid and melanin pigment coloration affect perceived human health. Evolution and Human Behavior 32: 216–227.

Anderson LD (1921) Estimating Intelligence by Means of Printed Photographs. Journal of Applied Psychology 5: 152–155.

Zebrowitz LA (1997) Reading Faces: Window To The Soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Rule NO, Ambady N (2010) Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces. Plos One 5. PubMed PMC

Burke D, Sulikowski D (2010) A New Viewpoint on the Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Human Faces. Evolutionary Psychology 8: 573–585. PubMed

Todorov A, Christopher S, Verovsky SC (2011) Personality impressions from facial appearance. In: Calder A, Rhodes G, Johnson M, Haxby J, editors. The Oxford handbook of face perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 631–652.

Samochowiec J, Wänke M, Fiedler K (2010) Political Ideology at Face Value. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1: 206–213.

Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 315–324.

Zebrowitz LA, Hall JA, Murphy NA, Rhodes G (2002) Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 238–249.

Kanazawa S (2011) Intelligence and physical attractiveness. Intelligence 39: 7–14.

Kanazawa S, Kovar JL (2004) Why beautiful people are more intelligent. Intelligence 32: 227–243.

Penke L, Borsboom D, Johnson W, Kievit RA, Ploeger A, et al. (2011) Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research cannot be integrated the way Kanazawa (2010) suggested. PubMed

Gelman A, Weakliem D (2009) Of beauty, sex, and power: statistical challenges in estimating small effects. American Scientist 97: 310–316.

Denny K (2008) Beauty and intelligence may–or may not–be related. Intelligence 36: 616–618.

Miller GF (2000) Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. In: Bock G, Goode J, Webb K, editors. The nature of intelligence. New York: John Wiley. pp. 260–275.

Prokosch MD, Yeo RA, Miller GF (2005) Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability. Intelligence 33: 203–213.

Haselton MG, Miller GR (2006) Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature-an Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 17: 50–73. PubMed

Greengross G, Miller G (2011) Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence 39: 188–192.

Zebrowitz LA, Rhodes G (2004) Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 28: 167–185.

Miller GF, Todd PM (1998) Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 190–198. PubMed

Borkenau P, Liebler A (1993) Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and inteligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 546–553.

Borkenau P, Liebler A (1995) Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality 63: 1–25.

Reynolds DJ, Gifford R (2001) The sounds and sights of intelligence: A lens model channel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 187–200.

Murphy NA, Hall JA (2011) Intelligence and interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 39: 54–63.

Murphy NA, Hall JA, Colvin CR (2003) Accurate intelligence assessments in social interactions: Mediators and gender effects. Journal of Personality 71: 465–493. PubMed

Borkenau P, Mauer N, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Angleitner A (2004) Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 599–614. PubMed

Murphy NA (2007) Appearing smart: The impression management of intelligence, person perception accuracy, and behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 325–339. PubMed

Plháková A (2005) Test struktury inteligence I-S-T 2000 R. Praha: Testcentrum.

Amthauer R, Brocke B, Liepmann D, Beauducel A (2001) Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Cattell RB (1971) Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. New York: Houghton Mifflin

Brand A, Bradley MT (2012) More voodoo correlations: When average-based measures inflate correlations. The Journal of General Psychology 139: 260–272. PubMed

Rohlf JF (2008) TpsRelw (version 1.46). New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Fink B, Grammer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Schaefer K, et al. (2005) Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272: 1995–2001. PubMed PMC

Kleisner K, Kocnar T, Rubesova A, Flegr J (2010) Eye color predicts but does not directly influence perceived dominance in men. Personality and Individual Differences 49: 59–64.

Schaefer K, Grammer K, Fink B, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, et al. (2006) Female appearance: Facial and bodily attractiveness as shape. Psychology Science 48: 178–205.

Kleisner K, Priplatova L, Frost P, Flegr J (2013) Trustworthy-Looking Face Meets Brown Eyes. PLoS ONE 8: e53285. PubMed PMC

Rohlf JF (2009) TpsRegr (version 1.36). New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Rohlf JF (2004) TpsSuper (version 1.14). New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, et al. (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126: 390–423. PubMed

Feingold A (1992) Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin 111: 304–341.

Oosterhof NN, Todorov A (2009) Shared Perceptual Basis of Emotional Expressions and Trustworthiness Impressions From Faces. Emotion 9: 128–133. PubMed

Moore F, Filippou D, Perrett D (2011) Intelligence and attractiveness in the face: Beyond the attractiveness halo effect. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 9: 205–217.

Nettle D (2006) Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality 40: 876–890.

Nettle D, Clegg H (2006) Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273: 611–615. PubMed PMC

DeYoung CG, Grazioplene RG, Peterson JB (2012) From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality 46: 63–78.

Miller G (2000) Mental traits as fitness indicators - Expanding evolutionary psychology's adaptationism. In: LeCroy D, Moller P, editors. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Reproductive Behavior. pp. 62–74. PubMed

Miller GF (2001) The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature.: Anchor Books.

Pound N, Penton-Voak IS, Surridge AK (2009) Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 153–159. PubMed PMC

Roney JR, Hanson KN, Durante KM, Maestripieri D (2006) Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273: 2169–2175. PubMed PMC

Neave N, Laing S, Fink B, Manning JT (2003) Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 2167–2172. PubMed PMC

Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J (2005) Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters 1: 256–259. PubMed PMC

Congruence in European and Asian perception of Vietnamese facial attractiveness, averageness, symmetry and sexual dimorphism

Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs

Focal Length Affects Depicted Shape and Perception of Facial Images