Final overall survival results of a randomized trial comparing bortezomib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with bortezomib alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
Grantová podpora
R01 CA194264
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P30 CA016672
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P50 CA142509
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U10 CA032102
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA184464
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
27191689
PubMed Central
PMC5701574
DOI
10.1002/cncr.30026
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- bortezomib, doxorubicin, multiple myeloma, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, survival,
- MeSH
- bortezomib aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- doxorubicin aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- polyethylenglykoly aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bortezomib MeSH
- doxorubicin MeSH
- liposomal doxorubicin MeSH Prohlížeč
- polyethylenglykoly MeSH
BACKGROUND: Previous results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomized, phase 3 study demonstrated that bortezomib combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was superior to bortezomib monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who had previously received one or more lines of therapy. Protocol-defined final survival data from that study are provided here. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either bortezomib alone (1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of every 21-day cycle) or bortezomib-PLD (bortezomib plus PLD 30 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 4). The primary endpoint was the time to progression. Secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and the overall response rate. RESULTS: In total, 646 patients (bortezomib-PLD, n = 324; bortezomib alone, n = 322) were randomized between December, 2004, and March, 2006. On the clinical cutoff date (May 16, 2014) for the final survival analysis, at a median follow-up of 103 months, 79% of patients had died (bortezomib-PLD group: 253 of 324 patients; 78%; bortezomib alone group: 257 of 322 patients; 80%). The median OS in the bortezomib-PLD group was 33 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.9-37.1) versus 30.8 months (95% CI, 25.2-36.5) in the bortezomib alone group (hazard ratio, 1.047; 95% CI, 0.879-1.246; P = .6068). Salvage therapies included conventional and novel drugs, which were well balanced between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite inducing a superior time to progression, long-term follow-up revealed that PLD-bortezomib did not improve OS compared with bortezomib alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The inability to sustain the early observed survival advantage may have been caused by the effects of subsequent lines of therapy, and underscores the need for long-term follow-up of phase 3 trials while recognizing the challenge of having adequate power to detect long-term differences in OS. Cancer 2016;122:2050-6. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Department of Hematology Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute Rotterdam the Netherlands
Department of Hematology Medical University of Łódź Łódź Poland
Department of Hematology Royal Adelaide Hospital West Australia Australia
Department of Internal Medicine Charles University General Faculty Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Lymphoma Myeloma The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
Division of Hematology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Division of Hematology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Department Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland
Janssen Research and Development LLC Raritan New Jersey
Malignant Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Munshi NC, Anderson KC. New strategies in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3337–3344. PubMed PMC
Redic K. Carfilzomib: a novel agent for multiple myeloma. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65:1095–1106. PubMed
Barlogie B, Anaissie E, van Rhee F, et al. Incorporating bortezomib into upfront treatment for multiple myeloma: early results of total therapy 3. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:176–185. PubMed
Jakubowiak AJ, Kendall T, Al-Zoubi A, et al. Phase II trial of combination therapy with bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5015–5022. 2009;27:5015–5022. PubMed
Offidani M, Corvatta L, Piersantelli MN, et al. Thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) for patients older than 65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:2159–2164. PubMed
San-Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva N, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:906–917. PubMed
Voorhees PM, Orlowski RZ, Mulkey F, et al. Long-term outcomes for newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and bortezomib: final results of CLAGB (Alliance) 10303, a multicenter phase II study. Br J Haematol. 2015;171:373–377. PubMed PMC
Orlowski RZ, Nagler A, Sonneveld P, et al. Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: combination therapy improves time to progression. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3892–3901. PubMed
Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Richardson PG, et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 potentiates sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to conventional chemotherapeutic agents: therapeutic applications. Blood. 2003;101:2377–2380. PubMed
Orlowski RZ, Voorhees PM, Garcia RA, et al. Phase 1 trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2005;105:3058–3065. PubMed
Sonneveld P, Hajek R, Nagler A, et al. Combined pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and bortezomib is highly effective in patients with recurrent or refractory multiple myeloma who received prior thalidomide/lenalidomide therapy. Cancer. 2008;112:1529–1537. PubMed
Blade J, Sonneveld P, San Miguel JF, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety in patients with renal function impairment. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008;8:352–355. PubMed
Garderet L, Iacobelli S, Moreau P, et al. Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation: the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 randomized phase III trial from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2475–2482. PubMed
Moreau P, Richardson PG, Cavo M, et al. Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood. 2012;120:947–959. PubMed PMC
Wright JJ. Combination therapy of bortezomib with novel targeted agents: an emerging treatment strategy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4094–4104. PubMed
Lonial S, Mitsiades CS, Richardson PG. Treatment options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1264–1277. PubMed