Safety and Efficacy of Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review
PubMed
27923755
DOI
10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.134
PII: S1878-8750(16)31282-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Aneurysm, DACA, Endovascular treatment, Meta-analysis, Microsurgery,
- MeSH
- Cerebral Hemorrhage mortality MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Endovascular Procedures mortality statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Intracranial Aneurysm diagnosis mortality therapy MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy mortality statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Comorbidity MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Postoperative Complications diagnosis mortality MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Cerebral Revascularization mortality statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Aneurysms of the distal anterior cerebral artery (DACA) are rare, representing between 1% and 9% of all intracranial aneurysms. The best treatment strategy for these aneurysms continues to be debated. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment strategies of DACA aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed for studies published from January 2000 to August 2015. We included studies describing treatment of DACA aneurysms with ≥10 patients. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the following outcomes: complete occlusion, technical success, periprocedural morbidity/mortality and stroke rates, aneurysm recurrence/rebleed, and long-term neurologic morbidity/mortality. RESULTS: Thirty studies with 1329 DACA aneurysms were included. Complete occlusion was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0%-97.0%) in the surgical group and 68% (95% CI, 56.0%-78.0%) in the endovascular group (P < 0.0001). Aneurysm recurrence occurred in 3% (95% CI, 2.0%-4.0%) after surgery and in 19.1% (95% CI, 12.0%-27.0%) after endovascular treatment (P < 0.0001). Overall neurologic morbidity and mortality were 15% (95% CI, 11.0%-21.0%) and 9% (95% CI, 7.0%-11.0%) after surgery and 14% (95% CI, 10.0%-19.0%) (P = 0.725) and 7% (95% CI, 5.0%-10.0%) (P = 0.422) after endovascular treatment, respectively. Overall long-term favorable neurologic outcome was 80% and it was equal in both groups (80%; 95% CI, 73.0%-85.0% in the surgical group and 80%; 95% CI, 72.0%-87.0% in the endovascular group) (P = 0.892). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that both treatment modalities are technically feasible and effective with sufficient long-term aneurysm occlusion and acceptable recurrence/rebleed rates. Surgical treatment is associated with superior angiographic outcomes. There were no substantial differences in procedure-related morbidity and mortality. These findings are important because they suggest that therapy of DACA aneurysms should be performed on a selective, case-by-case basis to maximize patient benefits.
References provided by Crossref.org