Monitoring quality and coverage of harm reduction services for people who use drugs: a consensus study

. 2017 Apr 22 ; 14 (1) : 19. [epub] 20170422

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu konsensuální prohlášení, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28431584

Grantová podpora
DP1 DA034989 NIDA NIH HHS - United States
P30 DA011041 NIDA NIH HHS - United States
R01 DA013336 NIDA NIH HHS - United States

Odkazy

PubMed 28431584
PubMed Central PMC5401609
DOI 10.1186/s12954-017-0141-6
PII: 10.1186/s12954-017-0141-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite advances in our knowledge of effective services for people who use drugs over the last decades globally, coverage remains poor in most countries, while quality is often unknown. This paper aims to discuss the historical development of successful epidemiological indicators and to present a framework for extending them with additional indicators of coverage and quality of harm reduction services, for monitoring and evaluation at international, national or subnational levels. The ultimate aim is to improve these services in order to reduce health and social problems among people who use drugs, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, crime and legal problems, overdose (death) and other morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The framework was developed collaboratively using consensus methods involving nominal group meetings, review of existing quality standards, repeated email commenting rounds and qualitative analysis of opinions/experiences from a broad range of professionals/experts, including members of civil society and organisations representing people who use drugs. Twelve priority candidate indicators are proposed for opioid agonist therapy (OAT), needle and syringe programmes (NSP) and generic cross-cutting aspects of harm reduction (and potentially other drug) services. Under the specific OAT indicators, priority indicators included 'coverage', 'waiting list time', 'dosage' and 'availability in prisons'. For the specific NSP indicators, the priority indicators included 'coverage', 'number of needles/syringes distributed/collected', 'provision of other drug use paraphernalia' and 'availability in prisons'. Among the generic or cross-cutting indicators the priority indicators were 'infectious diseases counselling and care', 'take away naloxone', 'information on safe use/sex' and 'condoms'. We discuss conditions for the successful development of the suggested indicators and constraints (e.g. funding, ideology). We propose conducting a pilot study to test the feasibility and applicability of the proposed indicators before their scaling up and routine implementation, to evaluate their effectiveness in comparing service coverage and quality across countries. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of an improved set of validated and internationally agreed upon best practice indicators for monitoring harm reduction service will provide a structural basis for public health and epidemiological studies and support evidence and human rights-based health policies, services and interventions.

Alcohol Drug and Tobacco Division Health and Wellbeing Directorate Public Health England London UK

Barcelona Institute of Global Health Hospital Clinic University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Centre d'Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya Barcelona Spain

Centre for Global Governance Studies Leuven Belgium

Centre for Infectious Disease Control National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven The Netherlands

Centro Studi Statistici e Sociali CE3S Rome Italy

CHIP Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health Madrid Spain

Department of Addictology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Department of Health Wellington House London UK

Department of Hygiene Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Medical School National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction Praça Europa 1 Cais do Sodré 1249 289 Lisbon Portugal

French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction Saint Denis France

Group of Activists on Treatments Lisbon Portugal

Health Research Board Dublin Ireland

Institute of Infectious Disease Research National Development and Research Institutes New York USA

Intercambios Civil Association and University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

Leuven Institute of Criminology Faculty of Law University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

Marseille Univ INSERM IRD SESSTIM Marseille France

National Institute for Mental Health Prague Czech Republic

National Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Addiction Prague Czech Republic

ORS PACA Marseille France

Program of International Research and Training National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre The University of New South Wales Sydney Australia

Public Health Institute Faculty of Education Health and Community Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool UK

School of Social and Community Medicine University of Bristol Bristol UK

Spanish Field Epidemiology Training Program National Centre of Epidemiology Carlos 3 Health Institute Madrid Spain

The Romanian Association Against AIDS Bucharest Romania

Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland

Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre Sydney Australia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Samet JH, Fiellin DA. Opioid substitution therapy-time to replace the term. Lancet. 2015;385:1508–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60750-4. PubMed DOI

Harm Reduction International. The global state of harm reduction 2016. Edited by Stone K. London: Harm Reduction International; 2016. https://www.hri.global/files/2016/11/14/GSHR2016_14nov.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Committee on the Prevention of HIV Infection among Injecting Drug Users in High-Risk Countries. Preventing HIV infection among injecting drug users in high risk countries: an assessment of the evidence. Washington: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; 2006.

WHO. Evidence for action series—technical papers and policy briefs on HIV/AIDS and injecting drug users. Geneva: WHO; 2015. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/idu/evidence_for_action/en/. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

ECDC, EMCDDA. Prevention and control of infectious diseases among people who inject drugs. Stockholm: ECDC/EMCDDA; 2011. https://goo.gl/2rQBzv. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

WHO, UNODC, UNAIDS. WHO, UNODC, UNAIDS technical guide for countries to set targets for universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care for injecting drug users—2012 revision. Geneva: WHO; 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77969/1/9789241504379_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Palmateer NE, Taylor A, Goldberg DJ, Munro A, Aitken C, Shepherd SJ, et al. Rapid decline in HCV incidence among people who inject drugs associated with national scale-up in coverage of a combination of harm reduction interventions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104515. PubMed DOI PMC

MacArthur GJ, van Velzen E, Palmateer N, Kimber J, Pharris A, Hope V, et al. Interventions to prevent HIV and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: a review of reviews to assess evidence of effectiveness. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25:34–52. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.07.001. PubMed DOI

Palmateer N, Kimber J, Hickman M, Hutchinson S, Rhodes T, Goldberg D. Evidence for the effectiveness of sterile injecting equipment provision in preventing hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus transmission among injecting drug users: a review of reviews. Addiction. 2010;105:844–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02888.x. PubMed DOI

Degenhardt L, Mathers BM, Wirtz AL, Wolfe D, Kamarulzaman A, Carrieri MP, et al. What has been achieved in HIV prevention, treatment and care for people who inject drugs, 2010–2012? A review of the six highest burden countries. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.004. PubMed DOI

Aspinall EJ, Nambiar D, Goldberg DJ, Hickman M, Weir A, Van Velzen E, et al. Are needle and syringe programmes associated with a reduction in HIV transmission among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:235–48. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt243. PubMed DOI

Des Jarlais DC, Feelemyer JP, Modi SN, Abdul-Quader A, Hagan H. High coverage needle/syringe programs for people who inject drugs in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-53. PubMed DOI PMC

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Ali H, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Mattick RP, et al. HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for people who inject drugs: a systematic review of global, regional, and national coverage. Lancet. 2010;375:1014–28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60232-2. PubMed DOI

Hedrich D, Pirona A, Wiessing L. From margin to mainstream: the evolution of harm reduction responses to problem drug use in Europe. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2008;15:503–17. doi: 10.1080/09687630802227673. DOI

Wiessing L, Likatavicius G, Klempova D, Hedrich D, Nardone A, Griffiths P. Associations between availability and coverage of HIV-prevention measures and subsequent incidence of diagnosed HIV infection among injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1049–52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679784/. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed PMC

Strang J, Manning V, Mayet S, Titherington E, Offor L, Semmler C, et al. Family carers and the prevention of heroin overdose deaths: unmet training need and overlooked intervention opportunity of resuscitation training and supply of naloxone. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2008;15:211–8. doi: 10.1080/09687630701731205. DOI

Williams AV, Strang J, Marsden J. Development of Opioid Overdose Knowledge (OOKS) and Attitudes (OOAS) Scales for take-home naloxone training evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:383–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.007. PubMed DOI

Minozzi S, Amato L, Davoli M. Preventing fatal overdoses: a systematic review of the effectiveness of take-home naloxone. Office of the European Union: Luxembourg; 2015. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_234376_EN_TDAU14009ENN.web_.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Grebely J, Bruggmann P, Treloar C, Byrne J, Rhodes T, Dore GJ. Expanding access to prevention, care and treatment for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26:893–8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.007. PubMed DOI

Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Bangsberg DR, Singh S, Rachlis B, Wu P, et al. Adherence to HAART: a systematic review of developed and developing nation patient-reported barriers and facilitators. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030438. PubMed DOI PMC

Wood E, Milloy MJ, Montaner JS. HIV treatment as prevention among injection drug users. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:151–6. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32834f9927. PubMed DOI

Milloy MJ, Montaner J, Wood E. Barriers to HIV treatment among people who use injection drugs: implications for ‘treatment as prevention’. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:332–8. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328354bcc8. PubMed DOI

EMCDDA. Best practice portal. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2017. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/best-practice. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ferri M, Bo A. Best practice promotion in Europe: a web-based tool for the dissemination of evidence-based demand reduction interventions. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2013;20:331–7. doi: 10.3109/09687637.2012.745486. DOI

Maccoun RJ. The implicit rules of evidence-based policy analysis, updated. Addiction. 2010;105:1335–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02936.x. PubMed DOI

MacCoun R, Reuter P. The implicit rules of evidence-based drug policy: a U.S. perspective. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19:231–2. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.02.012. PubMed DOI

Mravcik V. (De)criminalisation of possession of drugs for personal use—a view from the Czech Republic. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26:705–7 PubMed

Jolley E, Rhodes T, Platt L, Hope V, Latypov A, Donoghoe M et al. HIV among people who inject drugs in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia: a systematic review with implications for policy. BMJ Open. 2012;2:pii=e001465. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/2/5/e001465.full.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed PMC

Buster M, Dorn T, Ceelen M, Das K. Detainees in Amsterdam, a target population of the Public Mental Health System? J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;25:55–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.015. PubMed DOI

Eastwood N, Fox E, Rosmarin A. A quiet revolution: drug decriminalisation across the globe. London: Release; 2016.

Goncalves R, Lourenco A, Silva SN. A social cost perspective in the wake of the Portuguese strategy for the fight against drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.017. PubMed DOI

Csete J. A balancing act: policymaking on illicit drugs in the Czech Republic. New York: Open Society Foundations; 2012. http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/A_Balancing_Act-03-14-2012.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ysa T, Colom J, Albareda A, Ramon A, Segura L. Governance of addictions: European public policies. Oxford: OUP; 2014.

Hall W, Weier M. Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:607–15. doi: 10.1002/cpt.110. PubMed DOI

Wilkinson ST, Yarnell S, Radhakrishnan R, Ball SA, D’Souza DC. Marijuana legalization: impact on physicians and public health. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:453–66. PubMed PMC

Cressey D. The cannabis experiment. Nature. 2015;524:280–3. doi: 10.1038/524280a. PubMed DOI

Wiessing L, Des Jarlais D, Hughes B, Ferri M, Griffiths P. Cannabis: monitor policy changes. Nature. 2015;527:305. doi: 10.1038/527305d. PubMed DOI

Comiskey CM. We need to decriminalise small amounts of drugs and open safe heroin injecting centres. Int Bus Times. 2015. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/we-need-decriminalise-small-amounts-drugs-open-safe-heroin-injecting-centres-1527421. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Duncan DF, Nicholson T, White JB, Ellis-Griffith G. A brief history of prohibition and treatment solutions for substance abusers. Int J Criminol Sociol. 2014;3:186–99.

Levine HG. The secret of worldwide drug prohibition. Indep Rev. 2002;7:165–80. http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_07_2_levine.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

EMCDDA. European Drug Report 2016. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2016. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/2637/TDAT16001ENN.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Strathdee SA, West BS, Reed E, Moazen B, Azim T, Dolan K. Substance use and HIV among female sex workers and female prisoners: risk environments and implications for prevention, treatment, and policies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):S110–7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000624. PubMed DOI PMC

Larney S, Dolan K. A literature review of international implementation of opioid substitution treatment in prisons: equivalence of care? Eur Addict Res. 2009;15:107–12. doi: 10.1159/000199046. PubMed DOI

Dolan K, Kite B, Black E, Aceijas C, Stimson GV. HIV in prison in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:32–41. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70685-5. PubMed DOI

UNODC, ILO, UNDP, WHO, UNAIDS. Prevention, treatment and care in prisons and other closed settings: a comprehensive package of interventions. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2013. https://www.unodc.org/documents/hiv-aids/HIV_comprehensive_package_prison_2013_eBook.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Sypsa V, Paraskevis D, Malliori M, Nikolopoulos GK, Panopoulos A, Kantzanou M, et al. Homelessness and Other Risk Factors for HIV Infection in the Current Outbreak Among Injection Drug Users in Athens, Greece. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:196–204. PubMed PMC

Folch C, Casabona J, Espelt A, Majo X, Merono M, Gonzalez V, et al. High prevalence and incidence of HIV and HCV among new injecting drug users with a large proportion of migrants—is prevention failing? Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51:250–60. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1092991. PubMed DOI

Paraskevis D, Nikolopoulos G, Tsiara C, Paraskeva D, Antoniadou A, Lazanas M, et al. HIV-1 outbreak among injecting drug users in Greece, 2011: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:pii=19962. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19962. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Goldenberg SM, Duff P, Mwangi P, Rusakova M, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV among female sex workers: influence of structural determinants. Lancet. 2015;385:55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60931-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Wiessing LG, van Roosmalen MS, Koedijk P, Bieleman B, Houweling H. Silicones, hormones and HIV in transgender street prostitutes. AIDS. 1999;13:2315–6. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199911120-00022. PubMed DOI

Miri L, Wakrim L, Kassar H, Hemminki K, Khyatti M. Impact of immigration on HIV-1 molecular epidemiology in West Africa. Maghreb and Southern Europe. AIDS Rev. 2014;16:109–16. PubMed

Blondell SJ, Kitter B, Griffin MP, Durham J. Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Testing in Migrants in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:2012–24. PubMed

UNAIDS. Get on the fast-track—the life-cycle approach to HIV. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2016. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/Get-on-the-Fast-Track_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ferri M, Bo A, Amato L, Correia Guedes I, Esteves CS, Wiessing L et al. What is needed in future drug treatment research? A systematic approach to identify gaps on effectiveness of drug treatment from the EMCDDA. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2014;22:86–92. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/09687637.2014.954988?needAccess=true. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. DOI

Sanghani RM, Carlin AL, Moler AK. Assessing success—a commentary on the necessity of outcomes measures. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0017-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Schaub MP, Uchtenhagen A. Building a European consensus on minimum quality standards for drug treatment, rehabilitation and harm reduction. Eur Addict Res. 2013;19:314–24. doi: 10.1159/000350740. PubMed DOI

Nikolopoulos GK, Fotiou A, Kanavou E, Richardson C, Detsis M, Pharris A, et al. National income inequality and declining GDP growth rates are associated with increases in HIV diagnoses among people who inject drugs in Europe: a panel data analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122367. PubMed DOI PMC

Friedman SR, Pouget ER, Chatterjee S, Cleland CM, Tempalski B, Brady JE, et al. Drug arrests and injection drug deterrence. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:344–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191759. PubMed DOI PMC

Pharris A, Wiessing L, Sfetcu O, Hedrich D, Botescu A, Fotiou A et al. Humanimmunodeficiency virus in injecting drug users in Europe following a reported increase of cases in Greece and Romania, 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:pii=20032. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20032. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

Nordt C, Stohler R. Incidence of heroin use in Zurich, Switzerland: a treatment case register analysis. Lancet. 2006;367:1830–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68804-1. PubMed DOI

Abdul-Quader AS, Feelemyer J, Modi S, Stein ES, Briceno A, Semaan S, et al. Effectiveness of structural-level needle/syringe programs to reduce HCV and HIV infection among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:2878–92. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0593-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Emmanuelli J, Desenclos JC. Harm reduction interventions, behaviours and associated health outcomes in France, 1996–2003. Addiction. 2005;100:1690–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01271.x. PubMed DOI

Strike C, Watson TM, Lavigne P, Hopkins S, Shore R, Young D, et al. Guidelines for better harm reduction: evaluating implementation of best practice recommendations for needle and syringe programs (NSPs) Int J Drug Policy. 2011;22:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.03.007. PubMed DOI

Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:724–31. PubMed PMC

Eurasian Harm Reduction Network. Methodology to assess and monitor access to harm reduction services. Vilnius: EHRN; 2014. http://www.harm-reduction.org/sites/default/files/pdf/4_modules_glaossary_and_preface.zip. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979. PubMed DOI PMC

Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview: Scott Foresman; 1975.

Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Drugs 2013–2016 regarding minimum quality standards in drug demand reduction in the European Union. Brussels: Council of the European Union; 2015. https://goo.gl/l7NZK4. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ball A, Des Jarlais DC, Donoghoe MC, Friedman SR, Goldberg D, Hunter GM, et al. Multi-city study on drug injecting and risk of HIV infection: a report prepared on behalf of the WHO International Collaborative Group. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994. Programme on Substance Abuse. https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/bitstream/10665/62037/1/WHO_PSA_94.4.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Cire B. Global network will promote information exchange on HIV prevention in drug-using populations. NIDA Notes. National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1999. http://archives.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol13N5/Global.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Aceijas C, Stimson GV, Hickman M, Rhodes T. Global overview of injecting drug use and HIV infection among injecting drug users. AIDS. 2004;18:2295–303. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200411190-00010. PubMed DOI

Aceijas C, Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Wiessing L, Stimson GV, Hickman M. Estimates of injecting drug users at the national and local level in developing and transitional countries, and gender and age distribution. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82 Suppl 3:iii10–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576733/pdf/iii10.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed PMC

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372:1733–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61311-2. PubMed DOI

WHO, UNODC, UNAIDS. Technical Guide for countries to set targets for universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care for injecting drug users. Geneva: WHO; 2009. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/idu/idu_target_setting_guide.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

WHO. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations, Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. Geneva: WHO; 2014. https://goo.gl/QxWY3m. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

UNODC. World Drug Report 2015. Vienna: UNODC; 2015. http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr2015/World_Drug_Report_2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

UNAIDS. Global AIDS Monitoring 2017—indicators for monitoring the 2016 United Nations political declaration on HIV and AIDS. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2017. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2017-Global-AIDS-Monitoring_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

ICPR. World prison brief. London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research (ICPR); 2015. http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Hartnoll R, Avico U, Ingold FR, Lange K, Lenke L, O’Hare A, et al. A multi-city study of drug misuse in Europe. Bull Narc. 1989;41:3–27. PubMed

Simon R, Donmall M, Hartnoll R, Kokkevi A, Ouwehand AW, Stauffacher M, et al. The EMCDDA/Pompidou Group treatment demand indicator protocol: a European core item set for treatment monitoring and reporting. Eur Addict Res. 1999;5:197–207. doi: 10.1159/000018994. PubMed DOI

Stauffacher M, Kokkevi A. The Pompidou Group treatment demand protocol: the first pan-European standard in the field. Eur Addict Res. 1999;5:191–6. doi: 10.1159/000018993. PubMed DOI

Richardson C, Ancelle-Park R, Papaevangelou G. Factors associated with HIV seropositivity in European injecting drug users. The European Community Study Group on HIV in injecting drug users. AIDS. 1993;7:1485–91. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199311000-00013. PubMed DOI

Richardson SC, Papaevangelou G, Ancelle-Park R. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of European injecting drug users concerning preventive measures for HIV. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:135–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01730362. PubMed DOI

Schlumberger MG, Desenclos JC, Papaevangelou G, Richardson SC, Ancelle-Park R. Knowledge of HIV serostatus and preventive behaviour among European injecting drug users: second study. European Community Study Group on HIV in injecting drug users. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999;15:207–15. doi: 10.1023/A:1007578402083. PubMed DOI

Wiessing LG, Toet J, Houweling H, Koedijk PM, van den Akker R, Sprenger MJW. Prevalentie en risicofactoren van HIV-infectie onder druggebruikers in Rotterdam. [Prevalence and risk factors of HIV infection among drug users in Rotterdam]. Bilthoven: RIVM; 1995. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/213220001.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Houweling H, Wiessing LG, Hamers FF, Termorshuizen F, Gill ON, Sprenger MJ. An age-period-cohort analysis of 50,875 AIDS cases among injecting drug users in Europe. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:1141–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.6.1141. PubMed DOI

Jager JC, Achterberg PW, Postma MJ, Houweling H. Comparative impact assessment of AIDS: between doomsday and complacency. AIDS. 1996;10:238–40. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199602000-00024. PubMed DOI

Rotily M, Weilandt C, Bird SM, Kall K, Van Haastrecht HJ, Iandolo E, et al. Surveillance of HIV infection and related risk behaviour in European prisons. A multicentre pilot study. Eur J Public Health. 2001;11:243–50. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.243. PubMed DOI

Stover H, Nelles J. Ten years of experience with needle and syringe exchange programmes in European prisons. Int J Drug Policy. 2003;14:437–44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2003.08.001. DOI

Stover H, Casselman J, Hennebel L. Substitution treatment in European prisons: a study of policies and practices in 18 European countries. Int J Prison Health. 2006;2:3–12. http://www.drogenforschung.de/pdf/volltexte_pdf/nr18/subst_treatm_eupris.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Griffiths P, Mounteney J, Lopez D, Zobel F, Gotz W. Addiction research centres and the nurturing of creativity. Monitoring the European drug situation: the ongoing challenge for the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) Addiction. 2012;107:254–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03369.x. PubMed DOI

Mounteney J, Griffiths P, Sedefov R, Noor A, Vicente J, Simon R. The drug situation in Europe: an overview of data available on illicit drugs and new psychoactive substances from European monitoring in 2015. Addiction. 2016,111:34–48. PubMed

Wiessing L, Ncube F, Hedrich D, Griffiths P, Hope V, Gill N et al. Surveillance of infectious diseases in IDUs across the EU: information from the EU expert network. Euro Surveill. 2004;8:pii=2368. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=2368. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Wiessing L. New EMCDDA toolkit for monitoring infectious diseases. Drugnet Europe. 2014;85:2. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/785/Drugnet_85_weboptimised_461952.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Jager J, Limburg W, Kretzschmar M, Postma M, Wiessing L (eds). Hepatitis C and injecting drug use: impact, costs and policy options. EMCDDA: Lisbon; 2004. https://goo.gl/WgRoSB. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Wiessing L, Kraus L, Hay G, Rossi C, Frischer M, Jager J, et al. European network to develop policy relevant models and socio-economic analyses of drug use: consequences and interventions. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2002. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/html.cfm/index1376EN.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Godfrey C, Wiessing L, Hartnoll R (eds). Modelling drug use: methods to quantify and understand hidden processes. EMCDDA: Lisbon; 2000. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/922/Monograph6_159816.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Hartnoll RL. Drug epidemiology in the European institutions: historical background and key indicators. UN Bull Narc. 2003;55:53–72. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2003_01_01_1.pdf#page=60. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Wiessing L, Hartnoll R, Rossi C. The epidemiology of drug use at the macro level: indicators, models and policy-making. UN Bull Narc. 2001;53:119–33. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_2001-01-01_1_page011.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Hartnoll R. Drug trends in the European Union. 1999. Epidemiologic trends in drug abuse. International epidemiology work group on drug abuse June 1999. Proceedings. p. 49–58. https://archives.drugabuse.gov/pdf/cewg/IEWG699.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Uhl A, Hunt G, van den Brink W, Stimson GV. How credible are international databases for understanding substance use and related problems? Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26:119–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.10.014. PubMed DOI

Jones HE, Hickman M, Welton NJ, De AD, Harris RJ, Ades AE. Recapture or precapture? Fallibility of standard capture-recapture methods in the presence of referrals between sources. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:1383–93. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu056. PubMed DOI PMC

Zabransky T. On a search for useful indicators… or not? Addiction. 2015;110:741–3. doi: 10.1111/add.12858. PubMed DOI

UNODC. Global Assessment Programme on Drug Abuse (GAP). 2003; UNODC. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/GAP/. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Hickman M, Taylor C, Chatterjee A, Degenhardt L, Frischer M, Hay G, et al. Estimating the prevalence of problematic drug use: a review of methods and their application. UN Bull Narc. 2002;54:15–32. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2002_01_01_Art2.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Nelson PK, Mathers BM, Cowie B, Hagan H, Des Jarlais D, Horyniak D, Degenhardt L. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews. Lancet. 2011;378:571–83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61097-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Habicht JP, Victora CG, Vaughan JP. Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:10–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.10. PubMed DOI

Wiessing LG, Denis B, Guttormsson U, Haas S, Hamouda O, Hariga F, et al. Estimating coverage of harm-reduction measures for injection drug users in Europe. 2001. Global Research Network On HIV Prevention In Drug-Using Populations - Third Annual Meeting.July 5-7, 2000, Durban. Bethesda: NIDA; 2001. https://goo.gl/BWHjSN. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

EMCDDA. 2001 annual report on the state of the drugs problem in the European Union. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2001. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_37276_EN_ar01_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Humphreys K. Commentary on Gustafson et al. (2013): can we know that addiction treatment has been improved without evidence of better patient outcomes? Addiction. 2013;108:1158–9. doi: 10.1111/add.12144. PubMed DOI

Blystad H, Wiessing L. Guidelines for testing HIV, viral hepatitis and other infections in injecting drug users. EMCDDA manuals no 6. EMCDDA: Lisbon; 2010. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/manuals/testing-guidelines. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

Goltzman PM. Intervenciones desde la Reducción de Daños. Perspectivas y desafíos actuales. Memoria de encuentro, Buenos Aires 21-22 de junio 2016. Buenos Aires: Intercambios; 2016. http://intercambios.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/RD-perspectivas-y-desafios-2016-Intercambios.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ritter A, Livingston M, Chalmers J, Berends L, Reuter P. Comparative policy analysis for alcohol and drugs: current state of the field. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;31:39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.02.004. PubMed DOI

Belackova V, Ritter A, Shanahan M, Hughes CE. Assessing the concordance between illicit drug laws on the books and drug law enforcement: comparison of three states on the continuum from “decriminalised” to “punitive”. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;41:148–57. PubMed

Frischer M, Bloor M, Finlay A, Goldberg D, Green S, Haw S, et al. A new method of estimating prevalence of injecting drug use in an urban population: results from a Scottish city. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20:997–1000. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.4.997. PubMed DOI

Jones HE, Welton NJ, Ades AE, Pierce M, Davies W, Coleman B et al. Problem drug use prevalence estimation revisited: heterogeneity in capture-recapture and the role of external evidence. Addiction. 2016;111:438–47. PubMed PMC

Hay G, McKeganey N, Wiessing L, Bello PY, D’Ippoliti D, Domingo-Salvany A, et al. Methodological guidelines to estimate the prevalence of problem drug use on the local level. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 1999. https://goo.gl/9RK1hz. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Kraus L, Augustin R, Frischer M, Kummler P, Uhl A, Wiessing L. Estimating prevalence of problem drug use at national level in countries of the European Union and Norway. Addiction. 2003;98:471–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00326.x. PubMed DOI

Frischer M, Hickman M, Kraus L, Mariani F, Wiessing L. A comparison of different methods for estimating the prevalence of problematic drug misuse in Great Britain. Addiction. 2001;96:1465–76. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9610146510.x. PubMed DOI

Chatterjee S, Tempalski B, Pouget ER, Cooper HL, Cleland CM, Friedman SR. Changes in the prevalence of injection drug use among adolescents and young adults in large U.S. metropolitan areas. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:1570–8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9992-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Holmberg SD. The estimated prevalence and incidence of HIV in 96 large US metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:642–54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.5.642. PubMed DOI PMC

Cooper HL, Brady JE, Friedman SR, Tempalski B, Gostnell K, Flom PL. Estimating the prevalence of injection drug use among black and white adults in large U.S. metropolitan areas over time (1992–2002): estimation methods and prevalence trends. J Urban Health. 2008;85:826–56. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9304-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Brady JE, Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Flom PL, Tempalski B, Gostnell K. Estimating the prevalence of injection drug users in the U.S. and in large U.S. metropolitan areas from 1992 to 2002. J Urban Health. 2008;85:323–51. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9248-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Pouget ER, Friedman SR, Cleland CM, Tempalski B, Cooper HL. Estimates of the population prevalence of injection drug users among Hispanic residents of large US metropolitan areas. J Urban Health. 2012;89:527–64. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9670-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Hickman M, De AD, Jones H, Harris R, Welton N, Ades AE. Multiple parameter evidence synthesis—a potential solution for when information on drug use and harm is in conflict. Addiction. 2013;108:1529–31. doi: 10.1111/add.12185. PubMed DOI

Tempalski B, Pouget ER, Cleland CM, Brady JE, Cooper HL, Hall HI, et al. Trends in the population prevalence of people who inject drugs in US metropolitan areas 1992–2007. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064789. PubMed DOI PMC

Pierce M, Bird SM, Hickman M, Millar T. National record linkage study of mortality for a large cohort of opioid users ascertained by drug treatment or criminal justice sources in England, 2005–2009. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;146:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.782. PubMed DOI PMC

Tempalski B, Cleland CM, Pouget ER, Chatterjee S, Friedman SR. Persistence of low drug treatment coverage for injection drug users in large US metropolitan areas. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010;5:23. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-23. PubMed DOI PMC

Stimson GV, Hickman M, Quirk A, Frischer M, Taylor C (eds.). Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in Europe. Lisbon: EMCDDA/Pompidou Group; 1997. http://old.ntakd.lt/files/leidiniai/emcdda/6-Monographs/5-Estimating.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Vickerman P, Martin NK, Hickman M. Understanding the trends in HIV and hepatitis C prevalence amongst injecting drug users in different settings—implications for intervention impact. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;123:122–31. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.032. PubMed DOI

Martin NK, Vickerman P, Miners A, Foster GR, Hutchinson SJ, Goldberg DJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus antiviral treatment for injection drug user populations. Hepatology. 2012;55:49–57. doi: 10.1002/hep.24656. PubMed DOI

Kretzschmar M, Wiessing LG. Modelling the spread of HIV in social networks of injecting drug users. AIDS. 1998;12:801–11. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199807000-00017. PubMed DOI

Kretzschmar M, Wiessing L. New challenges for mathematical and statistical modelling of HIV and HCV in IDUs. AIDS. 2008;22:1527–37. PubMed

Cousien A, Tran VC, Deuffic-Burban S, Jauffret-Roustide M, Dhersin JS, Yazdanpanah Y. Dynamic modelling of hepatitis C virus transmission among people who inject drugs: a methodological review. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22:213–29. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12337. PubMed DOI

Kaplan EH, O’Keefe E. Let the needles do the talking! Evaluating the New Haven needle exchange. Interfaces. 1993;23:7–26. https://goo.gl/50mafW. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

de Vos AS, Prins M, Kretzschmar ME. Hepatitis C virus treatment as prevention among injecting drug users: who should we cure first? Addiction. 2015;110:975–83. doi: 10.1111/add.12842. PubMed DOI

de Vos AS, Kretzschmar ME. The efficiency of targeted intervention in limiting the spread of HIV and hepatitis C virus among injecting drug users. J Theor Biol. 2013;333:126–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.017. PubMed DOI

Martin NK, Vickerman P, Grebely J, Hellard M, Hutchinson SJ, Lima VD, et al. Hepatitis C virus treatment for prevention among people who inject drugs: modeling treatment scale-up in the age of direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology. 2013;58:1598–609. doi: 10.1002/hep.26431. PubMed DOI PMC

de Vos AS, Prins M, Coutinho RA, van der Helm JJ, Kretzschmar ME. Treatment as prevention among injecting drug users; extrapolating from the Amsterdam cohort study. AIDS. 2014;28:911–8. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000190. PubMed DOI

Paraskevis D, Paraschiv S, Sypsa V, Nikolopoulos G, Tsiara C, Magiorkinis G, et al. Enhanced HIV-1 surveillance using molecular epidemiology to study and monitor HIV-1 outbreaks among intravenous drug users (IDUs) in Athens and Bucharest. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;35:109–21. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.004. PubMed DOI

Niculescu I, Paraschiv S, Paraskevis D, Abagiu A, Batan I, Banica L, et al. Recent HIV-1 outbreak among intravenous drug users in Romania: evidence for cocirculation of CRF14_BG and subtype F1 strains. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015;31:488–95. doi: 10.1089/aid.2014.0189. PubMed DOI PMC

Paraskevis D, Nikolopoulos G, Fotiou A, Tsiara C, Paraskeva D, Sypsa V, et al. Economic recession and emergence of an HIV-1 outbreak among drug injectors in Athens metropolitan area: a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78941. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0078941. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed DOI PMC

Balode D, Skar H, Mild M, Kolupajeva T, Ferdats A, Rozentale B, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the Latvian HIV-1 epidemic. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28:928–32. doi: 10.1089/aid.2011.0310. PubMed DOI PMC

Degenhardt L, Hall W. Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease. Lancet. 2012;379:55–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61138-0. PubMed DOI

Hser YI, Evans E, Grella C. Commentary on Degenhardt et al. (2014): Regional variation in the global burden of disease attributable to opioid dependence-where do the data come from and does population size matter? Addiction. 2014;109:1334–5. doi: 10.1111/add.12597. PubMed DOI

Degenhardt L, Mathers B, Hall WD. Response to Hser et al. (2014): the necessity for more and better data on the global epidemiology of opioid dependence. Addiction. 2014;109:1335–7. doi: 10.1111/add.12612. PubMed DOI

Wiessing L, Ferri M, Grady B, Kantzanou M, Sperle I, Cullen KJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection epidemiology among people who inject drugs in Europe: a systematic review of data for scaling up treatment and prevention. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103345. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0103345. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed PMC

Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jonsson B, et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21:655–79. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018. PubMed DOI

Friedman SR, Tempalski B, Brady JE, Friedman JJ, Cooper HL, Flom PL, et al. Predictors of the degree of drug treatment coverage for injection drug users in 94 metropolitan areas in the United States of America. Int J Drug Policy. 2007;18:475–85. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.10.004. PubMed DOI

Tempalski B, Flom PL, Friedman SR, Des Jarlais DC, Friedman JJ, McKnight C, et al. Social and political factors predicting the presence of syringe exchange programs in 96 US metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:437–47. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.065961. PubMed DOI PMC

Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Tempalski B, Keem M, Friedman R, Flom PL, et al. Relationships of deterrence and law enforcement to drug-related harms among drug injectors in US metropolitan areas. AIDS. 2006;20:93–9. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000196176.65551.a3. PubMed DOI

Wiessing L, Likatavicius G, Hedrich D, Guarita B, van de Laar MJ, Vicente J. Trends in HIV and hepatitis C virus infections among injecting drug users in Europe, 2005 to 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:pii=20031 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20031. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

van den Berg C, Smit C, van Brussel G, Coutinho R, Prins M. Full participation in harm reduction programmes is associated with decreased risk for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus: evidence from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies among drug users. Addiction. 2007;102:1454–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01912.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Hull MW, Wu Z, Montaner JS. Optimizing the engagement of care cascade: a critical step to maximize the impact of HIV treatment as prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:579–86. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3283590617. PubMed DOI

Yehia BR, Schranz AJ, Umscheid CA, Lo Re III V. The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101554. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101554. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed PMC

Strathdee SA, Beletsky L, Kerr T. HIV, drugs and the legal environment. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26(Suppl 1):S27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.09.001. PubMed DOI PMC

Bird SM, Hutchinson SJ. Male drugs-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison: Scotland, 1996–99. Addiction. 2003;98:185–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00264.x. PubMed DOI

OECD. OECD health statistics 2015—definitions, sources and methods. Paris: OECD; 2015. http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile=587d7574-6ed6-4408-9c32-481d322936e6. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

EMCDDA. Cost and financing of drug treatment services in Europe: an exploratory study. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2011. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_143682_EN_TDSI11001ENC.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Ritter A, Hull P, Berends L, Chalmers J, Lancaster K. A conceptual schema for government purchasing arrangements for Australian alcohol and other drug treatment. Addict Behav. 2016;60:228–34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.04.017. PubMed DOI

Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:265–72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006. PubMed DOI

Mason T, Sutton M, Whittaker W, McSweeney T, Millar T, Donmall M, et al. The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: difference-in-differences analysis of the ‘payment by results for drugs recovery’ pilot. Addiction. 2015;110:1120–8. doi: 10.1111/add.12920. PubMed DOI

McLellan AT, Kemp J, Brooks A, Carise D. Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: the Delaware experiment. Health Policy. 2008;87:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.010. PubMed DOI PMC

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. PubMed DOI PMC

Broome KM, Simpson DD, Joe GW. Patient and program attributes related to treatment process indicators in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;57:127–35. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00080-0. PubMed DOI

Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D. NTORS After Five Years. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study - Changes in substance use, health and criminal behaviour during the five years after intake. London: National Addiction Centre; 2001.

Godfrey C, Stewart D, Gossop M. Economic analysis of costs and consequences of the treatment of drug misuse: 2-year outcome data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS) Addiction. 2004;99:697–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00752.x. PubMed DOI

McKeganey N, Bloor M, McIntosh J, Neale J. Key findings from the Drug Outcome Research in Scotland (DORIS) study. Glasgow: University of Glasgow - Centre for Drug Misuse Research; 2008. http://substanceuseresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/DORIS-Key.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Donmall M, Jones A, Davies L, Barnard M. Summary of key findings from the Drug Treatment Outcomes Research Study (DTORS). Research Report 23 (summary). UK: Home Office; 2009. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/116599/horr23.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Jones A, Donmall M, Millar T, Moody A, Weston S, Anderson T, et al. The drug treatment outcomes research study (DTORS): final outcomes report - 3rd edition. UK: Home Office; 2009. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.604.904&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.

Mant J. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13:475–80. http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/6/475.full-text.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...