Relative efficacy and safety of ticagelor vs clopidogrel as a function of time to invasive management in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the PLATO trial

. 2017 Jun ; 40 (6) : 390-398. [epub] 20170609

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28598510

BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest that "upstream" P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be considered in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). HYPOTHESIS: Early use of ticagrelor in patients managed with an invasive strategy would be more effective than clopidogrel because of its more rapid onset of action and greater potency. METHODS: In the PLATO trial, 6792 NSTE-ACS patients were randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel (started prior to angiography) and underwent angiography within 72 hours of randomization. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel as a function of "early" (<3h) vs "late" (≥3h) time to angiography. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models evaluated interaction between randomized treatment and time from randomization to angiography on subsequent outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, a benefit of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke was seen at day 7 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, P = 0.002), day 30 (HR: 0.81, P = 0.042), and 1 year (HR: 0.80, P = 0.0045). There were no significant interactions in the <3h vs ≥3h groups at any timepoint. For major bleeding, overall there was no significant increase (HR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.27); but there was a significant interaction with no difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the early group (HR: 0.79), but higher bleeding risk with ticagrelor in the late angiography group, at 7 days (HR: 1.51, Pint = 0.002). Patterns were similar at 30 days and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel was consistent in those undergoing early and late angiography, supporting upstream use of ticagrelor.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in Circulation 2014;130(25):e431–e432]. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2354–2394. PubMed

Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hayes KM, et al. Platelet activation in myocardial ischemic syndromes. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004;2:535–545. PubMed

Woulfe D, Yang J, Brass L. ADP and platelets: the end of the beginning. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1503–1505. PubMed PMC

Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al; CURE Trial Investigators . Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST‐segment elevation [published corrections appear in N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1506 and 1716]. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502. PubMed

Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al; TRITON‐TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–2015. PubMed

Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al; PLATO Investigators . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–1057. PubMed

Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2012;126:875–910. PubMed

Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2999–3054. PubMed

Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, et al. Randomized double‐blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120:2577–2585. PubMed

Steg PG, James S, Harrington RA, et al; PLATO Study Group . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation. 2010;122:2131–2141. PubMed

Lindholm D, Varenhorst C, Cannon CP, et al. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome with or without revascularization: results from the PLATO trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2083–2093. PubMed PMC

Montalescot G, Collet JP, Ecollan P, et al. Effect of prasugrel pre‐treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI: the ACCOAST‐PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2563–2571. PubMed

Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Hollander JE, et al. ED administration of thienopyridines in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the NCDR. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:1005–1011. PubMed PMC

Ducrocq G, Schulte PJ, Becker RC, et al. Association of spontaneous and procedure‐related bleeds with short‐ and long‐term mortality after acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the PLATO trial. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:737–745. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...