Relative efficacy and safety of ticagelor vs clopidogrel as a function of time to invasive management in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the PLATO trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
28598510
PubMed Central
PMC6490557
DOI
10.1002/clc.22733
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Angiography, Antiplatelet Therapy, Clopidogrel, Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTE-ACS), P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists, Ticagrelor,
- MeSH
- adenosin aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty MeSH
- akutní koronární syndrom diagnóza patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- antagonisté purinergních receptorů P2Y aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- elektrokardiografie účinky léků MeSH
- inhibitory agregace trombocytů aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- klopidogrel MeSH
- koronární angiografie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- revaskularizace myokardu * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ticagrelor MeSH
- tiklopidin aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adenosin MeSH
- antagonisté purinergních receptorů P2Y MeSH
- inhibitory agregace trombocytů MeSH
- klopidogrel MeSH
- ticagrelor MeSH
- tiklopidin MeSH
BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest that "upstream" P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be considered in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). HYPOTHESIS: Early use of ticagrelor in patients managed with an invasive strategy would be more effective than clopidogrel because of its more rapid onset of action and greater potency. METHODS: In the PLATO trial, 6792 NSTE-ACS patients were randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel (started prior to angiography) and underwent angiography within 72 hours of randomization. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel as a function of "early" (<3h) vs "late" (≥3h) time to angiography. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models evaluated interaction between randomized treatment and time from randomization to angiography on subsequent outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, a benefit of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke was seen at day 7 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, P = 0.002), day 30 (HR: 0.81, P = 0.042), and 1 year (HR: 0.80, P = 0.0045). There were no significant interactions in the <3h vs ≥3h groups at any timepoint. For major bleeding, overall there was no significant increase (HR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.27); but there was a significant interaction with no difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the early group (HR: 0.79), but higher bleeding risk with ticagrelor in the late angiography group, at 7 days (HR: 1.51, Pint = 0.002). Patterns were similar at 30 days and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel was consistent in those undergoing early and late angiography, supporting upstream use of ticagrelor.
AstraZeneca Research and Development Gothenburg Sweden
Department of Cardiology National Heart Centre Singapore
Department of Emergency Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Dallas
Department of Infection Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease University of Sheffield United Kingdom
Department of Internal Medicine Cardiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology Uppsala University Sweden
Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in Circulation 2014;130(25):e431–e432]. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2354–2394. PubMed
Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hayes KM, et al. Platelet activation in myocardial ischemic syndromes. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004;2:535–545. PubMed
Woulfe D, Yang J, Brass L. ADP and platelets: the end of the beginning. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1503–1505. PubMed PMC
Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al; CURE Trial Investigators . Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST‐segment elevation [published corrections appear in N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1506 and 1716]. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502. PubMed
Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al; TRITON‐TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–2015. PubMed
Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al; PLATO Investigators . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–1057. PubMed
Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2012;126:875–910. PubMed
Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2999–3054. PubMed
Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, et al. Randomized double‐blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120:2577–2585. PubMed
Steg PG, James S, Harrington RA, et al; PLATO Study Group . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation. 2010;122:2131–2141. PubMed
Lindholm D, Varenhorst C, Cannon CP, et al. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome with or without revascularization: results from the PLATO trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2083–2093. PubMed PMC
Montalescot G, Collet JP, Ecollan P, et al. Effect of prasugrel pre‐treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI: the ACCOAST‐PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2563–2571. PubMed
Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Hollander JE, et al. ED administration of thienopyridines in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the NCDR. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:1005–1011. PubMed PMC
Ducrocq G, Schulte PJ, Becker RC, et al. Association of spontaneous and procedure‐related bleeds with short‐ and long‐term mortality after acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the PLATO trial. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:737–745. PubMed