Exposure-response relationship of ramucirumab in patients with advanced second-line colorectal cancer: exploratory analysis of the RAISE trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28744667
PubMed Central
PMC5573752
DOI
10.1007/s00280-017-3380-z
PII: 10.1007/s00280-017-3380-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Colorectal cancer, Exposure–response, FOLFIRI, Ramucirumab, Second line,
- MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- protinádorové látky aplikace a dávkování farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- ramucirumab MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
PURPOSE: To characterize ramucirumab exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using data from the RAISE study. METHODS: Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected; a population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the relationship between predicted ramucirumab minimum trough concentration at steady state (C min,ss) and survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival from patients in the ramucirumab plus folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) treatment arm stratified by C min,ss quartiles (Q). An ordered categorical model analyzed the relationship between C min,ss and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic samples from 906 patients were included in exposure-efficacy analyses; samples from 905 patients were included in exposure-safety analyses. A significant association was identified between C min,ss and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.0001 for both). This association remained significant after adjusting for baseline factors associated with OS or PFS (p < 0.0001 for both). Median OS was 11.5, 12.9, 16.4, and 16.7, and 12.4 months for ramucirumab C min,ss Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and placebo group, respectively. Median PFS was 5.4, 4.6, 6.8, 8.5, and 5.2 months for ramucirumab C min,ss Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and placebo group, respectively. The risk of Grade ≥3 neutropenia was associated with an increase in ramucirumab exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory exposure-response analyses suggested a positive relationship between efficacy and ramucirumab exposure with manageable toxicities in patients from the RAISE study with mCRC over the ranges of exposures achieved by a dose of 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI.
Eli Lilly and Company Bridgewater NJ USA
Eli Lilly and Company Buenos Aires Argentina
Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN USA
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
Hospital Virgen del Rocio Seville Spain
Institutul Oncologic Cluj Napoca Cluj Napoca Romania
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS Padua Italy
Kaiser Permanente San Diego San Diego CA USA
Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich Munich Germany
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan
Rocky Mountain Cancer Center 1800 Williams Street Denver CO 80218 USA
Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka Japan
Southern Medical Day Care Centre Wollongong Australia
Szent László Hospital Budapest Hungary
University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Louvain Belgium
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology Barcelona Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
World Health Organization (2012) GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence Worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed 8 June 2014
World Health Organization (2015) Cancer Fact sheet No. 297, updated February 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/. Accessed 8 June 2015
Colucci G, Gebbia V, Paoletti G, et al. Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):4866–4875. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.113. PubMed DOI
Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1041–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02034-1. PubMed DOI
Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(1):23–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.046. PubMed DOI
Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):905–914. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302. PubMed DOI
Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(2):229–237. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113. PubMed DOI
Spratlin JL, Cohen RB, Eadens M, et al. Phase I pharmacologic and biologic study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(5):780–787. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7537. PubMed DOI PMC
Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(5):499–508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70127-0. PubMed DOI
Feng Y, Roy A, Masson E, Chen TT, Humphrey R, Weber JS. Exposure-response relationships of the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(14):3977–3986. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3243. PubMed DOI
Wang J, Song P, Schrieber S, et al. Exposure-response relationship of T-DM1: insight into dose optimization for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(5):558–564. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.24. PubMed DOI
Zhu M, Tang R, Doshi S, et al. Exposure-response analysis of rilotumumab in gastric cancer: the role of tumour MET expression. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(3):429–437. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.649. PubMed DOI PMC
Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Muro K et al (2016) Exposure-response (E–R) relationship of ramucirumab (RAM) from two global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies of patients (Pts) with advanced second-line gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 33[(suppl 3):abstr 121]
Smit EF, Perol M, Reck M, et al. Exposure-response relationship for ramucirumab (RAM) from the randomized, double-blind, phase III REVEL trial (docetaxel [DOC] vs DOC plus RAM) in second-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(suppl):8053.
O’Brien L, Westwood P, Gao L, Heathman M. Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of Ramucirumab in cancer patients. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015;42(Supplement 1):S11–S107. PubMed PMC
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2003) Guidance for industry, exposure-response relationships-study design, data analysis, and regulatory applications. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm072109.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2015
Yang J, Zhao H, Garnett C, et al. The combination of exposure-response and case-control analyses in regulatory decision making. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(2):160–166. doi: 10.1177/0091270012445206. PubMed DOI
Shigeta K, Hasegawa H, Okabayashi K, et al. Randomized phase II trial of TEGAFIRI (tegafur/uracil, oral leucovorin, irinotecan) compared with FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) in patients with unresectable/recurrent colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(4):946–954. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30127. PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, et al. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(28):3499–3506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8201. PubMed DOI
Elez E, Kocakova I, Hohler T, et al. Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):132–140. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu474. PubMed DOI
Gibson TB, Ranganathan A, Grothey A. Randomized phase III trial results of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006;6(1):29–31. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2006.n.01. PubMed DOI
Grothey A, George S, van Cutsem E, Blay JY, Sobrero A, Demetri GD. Optimizing treatment outcomes with regorafenib: personalized dosing and other strategies to support patient care. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):669–680. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0059. PubMed DOI PMC
Grothey A. Regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: optimal dosing and patient selection recommendations. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2015;13(8):514–517. PubMed
Hecht JR, Patnaik A, Berlin J, et al. Panitumumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(5):980–988. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22915. PubMed DOI
Lv Y, Yang Z, Zhao L, Zhao S, Han J, Zheng L. The efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to cetuximab- or panitumumab-based therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a meta-analysis from randomized control trials. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(1):334–345. PubMed PMC
Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–2019. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930. PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Rivera F, Berry S, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(11):1842–1847. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp233. PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Humblet Y, et al. An open-label, single-arm study assessing safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(1):92–98. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm399. PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Kohne CH, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):692–700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812. PubMed DOI
Wilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(1):245–255. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25864. PubMed DOI
Thai HT, Veyrat-Follet C, Mentre F, Comets E. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of free and bound aflibercept in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(1):167–180. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2182-1. PubMed DOI
Tabernero J, Ciardiello F, Rivera F, et al. Cetuximab administered once every second week to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a two-part pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase I dose-escalation study. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(7):1537–1545. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp549. PubMed DOI
Lu JF, Bruno R, Eppler S, Novotny W, Lum B, Gaudreault J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62(5):779–786. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0664-8. PubMed DOI
Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B, Rosen LS, Demetri GD, Motzer RJ. Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66(2):357–371. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1170-y. PubMed DOI
Giles FJ, Yin OQ, Sallas WM, et al. Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(4):813–823. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1385-4. PubMed DOI
Han K, Jin J, Maia M, Lowe J, Sersch MA, Allison DE. Lower exposure and faster clearance of bevacizumab in gastric cancer and the impact of patient variables: analysis of individual data from AVAGAST phase III trial. AAPS J. 2014;16(5):1056–1063. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9631-6. PubMed DOI PMC