Directional preference in dogs: Laterality and "pull of the north"
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28945773
PubMed Central
PMC5612717
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0185243
PII: PONE-D-17-06865
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chování zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- funkční lateralita fyziologie MeSH
- magnetické pole MeSH
- psi fyziologie psychologie MeSH
- změna polohy v prostoru fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- psi fyziologie psychologie MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Laterality is a well described phenomenon in domestic dogs. It was shown that dogs, under calm Earth's magnetic field conditions, when marking their home ranges, tend to head about north- or southwards and display thus magnetic alignment. The question arises whether magnetic alignment might be affected or even compromised by laterality and vice versa. We tested the preference of dogs to choose between two dishes with snacks that were placed left and right, in different compass directions (north and east, east and south, south and west or west and north) in front of them. Some dogs were right-lateral, some left-lateral but most of them were ambilateral. There was a preference for the dish placed north compared to the one placed east of the dog ("pull of the north"). This effect was highly significant in small and medium-sized breeds but not in larger breeds, highly significant in females, in older dogs, in lateralized dogs but less significant or not significant in males, younger dogs, or ambilateral dogs. Laterality and "pull of the north" are phenomena which should be considered in diverse tasks and behavioral tests with which dogs or other animals might be confronted. The interaction and possible conflict between lateralization and "pull of the north" might be also considered as a reason for shifted magnetic alignment observed in different animal species in different contexts.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Rogers LJ. Laterality in animals. Internat J Comp Psychol. 1989;3:5–25.
Rogers LJ. Lateralization in vertebrates: its early evolution, general pattern, and development. Adv Study Behav. 2002;31:107–161.
Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew R.J. Divided brains. The Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries. 2013;Cambridge University Press, New York.
Schaafsma SM, Riedstra BJ, Pfannkuche KA, Bouma A, Groothuis TG. Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2009;364:915–927. PubMed PMC
Warren JM. Handedness and laterality in humans and other animals. Physiol. 1980;8:351–359.
Begall S, Malkemper EP, Červený J, Němec P, Burda H. Magnetic alignment in mammals and other animals. Mammal Biol. 2013;78:10–20.
Begall S, Malkemper EP, Burda H. Magnetoreception in mammals. Adv Study Behav. 2014;46:45–88.
Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Magnetic orientation in animals 1995; Springer, Berlin.
Malkemper EP, Painter MS, Landler L. Shifted magnetic alignment in vertebrates: Evidence for neural lateralization? J Theor Biol. 2016;399:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.03.040 PubMed DOI
Hart V, Nováková P, Begall S, Malkemper EP, Hanzal V, Ježek M, et al. Dogs are sensitive to small variations of the Earth's magnetic field. Front Zool. 2013;10:80 doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-80 PubMed DOI PMC
Batt L, Batt M, McGreevy P. Two tests for motor laterality in dogs. J Vet Behav. 2007;2:47–51.
Berta C. Lateralized behavior in domesticated dogs. ESSAI. 2010;8:9.
Branson NJ, Rogers LJ. Relationship between paw preference strength and noise phobia in Canis familiaris. J Comp Psychol. 2006;120:176–183. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.176 PubMed DOI
Nagasawa M, Kawai E, Mogi K, Kikusui T. Dogs show left facial lateralization upon reunion with their owners. Behav Proc. 2013;98:112–116. PubMed
Plueckham TC, Schneider LA, Delfabbro PH. Assessing lateralization in domestic dogs: Performance by Canis familiaris on the Kong test. J Vet Behav. 2016;15:25–30.
Schneider LA, Delfabbro PH, Burns NR. Temperament and lateralization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J Vet Behav. 2013;8:124–134.
Siniscalchi M, Sasso R, Pepe AM, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A. Dogs turn left to emotional stimuli. Behav Brain Res. 2010; 208:516–521. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.042 PubMed DOI
Siniscalchi M, Quaranta A, Rogers LJ. Hemispheric specialization in dogs for processing different acoustic stimuli. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3:e3349 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003349 PubMed DOI PMC
Siniscalchi M; Pergola G, Quaranta A. Detour behaviour in attack-trained dogs: Left-turners perform better than right-turners. Laterality. 2013; 18:282–293. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2012.662234 PubMed DOI
Siniscalchi M.; d’Ingeo S.; Fornelli S.; Quaranta A. Relationship between visuospatial attention and paw preference in dogs. Sci Rep 2016, 6 PubMed PMC
Siniscalchi M, d’Ingeo S, Quaranta A. The dog nose “KNOWS” fear: Asymmetric nostril use during sniffing at canine and human emotional stimuli. Behav Brain Res. 2016; 304:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.011 PubMed DOI
Tomkins LM, Thomson PC, McGreevy PD. First-stepping Test as a measure of motor laterality in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Vet Behav. 2010; 5:247–255.
Tomkins LM, Williams KA, Thomson PC, McGreevy PD. Lateralization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris): Relationships between structural, motor, and sensory laterality. J Vet Behav. 2012;7:70–79.
Rogers L, Vallortigara G (Eds). Lateralized Brain Functions. Methods in Human and Non-Human Species. 2017; Springer, New York.
Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Magnetic orientation in animals 1995; Springer, Heidelberg.
Marhold S, Burda H., Kreilos I, Wiltschko W. Magnetic orientation in common mole-rats from Zambia. In: Orientation and Navigation: Birds, Humans and Other Animals. 1997; Paper No 5. Royal Institute of Navigation, Oxford.
Obleser P, Hart V, Malkemper EP, Begall S, Holá M, Painter MS, et al. Compass-controlled escape behavior in roe deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:1345–1355.