• This record comes from PubMed

Shifts in the importance of the species pool and environmental controls of epiphytic bryophyte richness across multiple scales

. 2018 Mar ; 186 (3) : 805-816. [epub] 20180118

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
CGL2007-61389 Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
CGL2010-15693 Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
CGL2011-28857 Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
AP2007-00905 Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - International

Links

PubMed 29349719
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4066-x
PII: 10.1007/s00442-018-4066-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Species richness is influenced by a nested set of environmental factors, but how do these factors interact across several scales? Our main aim is to disentangle the relative importance of environmental filters and the species pool on the richness of epiphytic bryophytes across spatial scales. To do so, we sampled epiphytic bryophytes in 43 oak forests across the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula. As predictors we used climate, descriptors of forest structure and micro-environment. We applied structural equation modeling to relate these variables with richness and cover at three scales: locality (forest), stand (three stands per forest), and sample (a quadrate in a tree). We assumed top-down relationships, so that large-scale variables influenced lower scale variables, and in which cover directly influenced richness. Richness at the next larger scale (locality to stand and stand to sample) is considered a surrogate of the species pool and included as a predictor of richness at the next smaller scale. Environmental variables explain locality richness, but as we decrease the spatial scale, its importance decreases and the dependence on species pool increases. In addition, we found unexpected bottom-up relationships (between micro-scale environment to locality richness). Our results point to the scale dependence of niche vs. neutral processes: niche processes are important at the locality (forest) scale, while neutral processes are significant at the small (sample) scale. We propose a modified conceptualization of the factors influencing biodiversity at different spatial scales by adding links across different scales (between micro-environment and locality-scale richness in our study).

See more in PubMed

Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):363-8 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2014 Jul;17(7):866-80 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):399-409 PubMed

Ecol Evol. 2016 May 20;6(12):4088-101 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Mar;26(3):124-8 PubMed

Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):1986-92 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):969-79 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Jul;12(7):266-9 PubMed

Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):167-71 PubMed

Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):663-74 PubMed

Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):569-79 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):680-9 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...