Shifts in the importance of the species pool and environmental controls of epiphytic bryophyte richness across multiple scales
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
CGL2007-61389
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
CGL2010-15693
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
CGL2011-28857
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - International
AP2007-00905
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - International
PubMed
29349719
DOI
10.1007/s00442-018-4066-x
PII: 10.1007/s00442-018-4066-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Diversity, Neutral processes, Plant, Regional species pool, Scale,
- MeSH
- Biodiversity MeSH
- Bryophyta * MeSH
- Ecosystem * MeSH
- Trees MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Species richness is influenced by a nested set of environmental factors, but how do these factors interact across several scales? Our main aim is to disentangle the relative importance of environmental filters and the species pool on the richness of epiphytic bryophytes across spatial scales. To do so, we sampled epiphytic bryophytes in 43 oak forests across the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula. As predictors we used climate, descriptors of forest structure and micro-environment. We applied structural equation modeling to relate these variables with richness and cover at three scales: locality (forest), stand (three stands per forest), and sample (a quadrate in a tree). We assumed top-down relationships, so that large-scale variables influenced lower scale variables, and in which cover directly influenced richness. Richness at the next larger scale (locality to stand and stand to sample) is considered a surrogate of the species pool and included as a predictor of richness at the next smaller scale. Environmental variables explain locality richness, but as we decrease the spatial scale, its importance decreases and the dependence on species pool increases. In addition, we found unexpected bottom-up relationships (between micro-scale environment to locality richness). Our results point to the scale dependence of niche vs. neutral processes: niche processes are important at the locality (forest) scale, while neutral processes are significant at the small (sample) scale. We propose a modified conceptualization of the factors influencing biodiversity at different spatial scales by adding links across different scales (between micro-environment and locality-scale richness in our study).
See more in PubMed
Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):363-8 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jul;17(7):866-80 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):399-409 PubMed
Ecol Evol. 2016 May 20;6(12):4088-101 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Mar;26(3):124-8 PubMed
Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):1986-92 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):969-79 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Jul;12(7):266-9 PubMed
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):167-71 PubMed
Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):663-74 PubMed
Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):569-79 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):680-9 PubMed