Monitoring of resistance genes in Listeria monocytogenes isolates and their presence in the extracellular DNA of biofilms: a case study from the Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MSMT No 20-SVV/2015
MSMT
17-15936S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PubMed
29680913
DOI
10.1007/s12223-018-0603-6
PII: 10.1007/s12223-018-0603-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie MeSH
- bakteriální geny genetika MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence genetika MeSH
- biofilmy * MeSH
- DNA bakterií genetika metabolismus MeSH
- extracelulární prostor genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Listeria monocytogenes účinky léků genetika růst a vývoj izolace a purifikace MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- mikrobiální viabilita účinky léků MeSH
- potravinářská mikrobiologie MeSH
- shluková analýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky MeSH
- DNA bakterií MeSH
The alarming occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes in food production demands continuous monitoring worldwide. One reservoir of resistance genes is thought to be eDNA. There is currently little available information in Europe about either the extracellular DNA distribution of the bacterium or the spread of resistance genes in L. monocytogenes. Therefore, our aims were to give insight into the Listeria monocytogenes resistance situation in the Czech Republic and assess the presence of resistance genes in their extracellular DNA (eDNA). First, susceptibility tests were performed on 49 isolates of L. monocytogenes with selected antibiotics. Next, we tested DNA of suspected isolates for the presence of resistance genes in both planktonic cells and the eDNA of biofilms. Finally, fluorescent confocal microscopy was used to observe the eDNA pattern of selected isolates under conditions that mimicked the food processing environment and the human body. Susceptibility tests found isolates intermediate resistant to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin as well as isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin. For all suspected isolates, PCR confirmed the presence of the gene lde encoding efflux pump in both types of DNA. When the biofilm was observed using confocal laser scanning microscope, the eDNA distribution patterns varied considerably according to the culture conditions. Furthermore, the food and clinical isolates varied in terms of the amount of eDNA detected. The presence of an efflux pump in both types of DNA suggests that the eDNA might serve as a reservoir of resistance genes. Surprising differences were observed in the eDNA pattern. Our results suggest that the current risk of the spread of L. monocytogenes resistance genes is low in the Czech Republic, but they also indicate the need for continuous long-term monitoring of the situation.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Sep;43(9):2103-8 PubMed
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2345 PubMed
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(1):71-8 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2014 Oct;105:102-4 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Jun;54(6):2728-31 PubMed
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014 Feb;17:53-60 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Apr;77(8):2788-90 PubMed
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2017 Fall;66(3):146-148 PubMed
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jun 28;10(7):2643-69 PubMed
Postgrad Med. 1990 Jun;87(8):117-22, 124, 127-31 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):999-1007 PubMed
J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):205-18 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2375-80 PubMed
Microbiol Immunol. 2012 Dec;56(12):843-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(18):5846-52 PubMed
Food Microbiol. 2014 Sep;42:61-5 PubMed
PLoS Pathog. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000213 PubMed
Microbiologyopen. 2014 Feb;3(1):118-27 PubMed
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2007 Summer;4(2):216-21 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Apr;114(4):1120-31 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2352-61 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Sep;52(9):3040-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Apr;76(7):2271-9 PubMed
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2016 Feb;34(2):91-5 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014 Mar;59(2):133-40 PubMed
J Food Prot. 2014 Aug;77(8):1402-6 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013 Dec;57(6):467-75 PubMed
Dose Response. 2013 Jul 25;12(1):152-61 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Feb;47(2):704-8 PubMed
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2015;35(5):669-73 PubMed
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Sep;5(9):721-6 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016 Jan;62(1):23-9 PubMed
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012;48(2):146-50 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3819-22 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(6):763-8 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):865-73 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Mar;81(5):1813-9 PubMed
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2010 Aug;25(4):577-89 PubMed
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017 Jun;14(6):357-363 PubMed