A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of lymphovascular invasion in bladder cancer transurethral resection specimens
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
PubMed
29807387
PubMed Central
PMC7379926
DOI
10.1111/bju.14417
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- #BladderCancer, #blcsm, lymphovascular invasion, meta-analysis, progression, recurrence, transurethral resection, upstaging,
- MeSH
- cévy patologie MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru patologie MeSH
- lymfatické cévy patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře patologie chirurgie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
The aim of the present review was to assess the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder cancer (BCa) specimens on clinical outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature from the past 10 years was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library in August 2017. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (Central Registration Depository: CRD42018084876) and is available in full on the University of York website. Overall, 33 studies (including 6194 patients) evaluating the presence of LVI at TUR were retrieved. LVI was detected in 17.3% of TUR specimens. In 19 studies, including 2941 patients with ≤cT1 stage only, LVI was detected in 15% of specimens. In patients with ≤cT1 stage, LVI at TUR of the bladder tumour (TURBT) was a significant prognostic factor for disease recurrence (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62) and progression (pooled HR 2.95, 95% CI: 2.11-4.13), without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.84 and I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.93, respectively). For patients with cT1-2 disease, LVI was significantly associated with upstaging at time of radical cystectomy (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% CI: 1.45-3.96), with heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 53.6%, P = 0.044). LVI at TURBT is a robust prognostic factor of disease recurrence and progression in non-muscle invasive BCa. Furthermore, LVI has a strong impact on upstaging in patients with organ-confined disease. The assessment of LVI should be standardized, reported, and considered for inclusion in the TNM classification system, helping clinicians in decision-making and patient counselling.
Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Hospital Motol Charles University Praha Czech Republic
Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Centre Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology Kantonsspital Winterthur Winterthur Switzerland
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
GRC no 5 ONCOTYPE URO AP HP Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Sorbonne Université Paris France
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7–30 PubMed
Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M PubMed
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W PubMed
Mathieu R, Lucca I, Roupret M PubMed
Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS PubMed
Kikuchi E, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI PubMed PMC
Shariat SF, Svatek RS, Tilki D PubMed
Tilki D, Shariat SF, Lotan Y PubMed
Kim HS, Kim M, Jeong CW PubMed
Go H, Kim P‐J, Jeon YK PubMed
Miyake M, Gotoh D, Shimada K PubMed
Patschan O, Holmang S, Hosseini A PubMed
Weiss BE, Pietzak EJ, Wein AJ PubMed
Fukumoto K, Kikuchi E, Mikami S PubMed PMC
Haas CR, Barlow LJ, Badalato GM PubMed
Li G, Song H, Wang J PubMed PMC
Sha N, Xie L, Chen T PubMed PMC
Ukai R, Hashimoto K, Nakayama H, Iwamoto T. Lymphovascular invasion predicts poor prognosis in high‐grade pT1 bladder cancer patients who underwent transurethral resection in one piece. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 447–52 PubMed
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M PubMed PMC
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J PubMed PMC
Higgins JP. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Cochrane Collab, 2011.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88 PubMed
DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random‐effects model for meta‐analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28: 105–14 PubMed
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–60 PubMed PMC
Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R PubMed
Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Wells GA. Chapter 13 Including non‐randomised studies, 2011.
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC PubMed PMC
Andius P, Johansson SL, Holmang S. Prognostic factors in stage T1 bladder cancer: tumor pattern (solid or papillary) and vascular invasion more important than depth of invasion. Urology 2007; 70: 758–62 PubMed
Kassouf W, Spiess PE, Brown GA PubMed PMC
Herr HW. Outcome of patients who refuse cystectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 126–32 PubMed
Weizer AZ, Wasco MJ, Wang R PubMed
Cho KS, Seo HK, Joung JY PubMed
Streeper NM, Simons CM, Konety BR PubMed
Seo HK, Cho KS, Chung J PubMed
Font A, Taron M, Gago JL PubMed
Rodriguez Faba O, Palou J, Rosales A PubMed
Badalato GM, Gaya JM, Hruby G PubMed
Green DA, Rink M, Hansen J PubMed
Xie HY, Zhu Y, Yao XD PubMed
Kwon DH, Song PH, Kim HT. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of resection weight after transurethral resection of bladder tumor for non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Korean J Urol 2012; 53: 457–62 PubMed PMC
Branchereau J, Larue S, Vayleux B PubMed
Brimo F, Wu C, Zeizafoun N PubMed
Bolenz C, Auer M, Strobel P PubMed
Levidou G, Thymara I, Saetta AA PubMed
Olsson H, Hultman P, Rosell J, Jahnson S. Population‐based study on prognostic factors for recurrence and progression in primary stage T1 bladder tumours. Scand J Urol 2013; 47: 188–95 PubMed
Kaimakliotis HZ, Monn MF, Cary KC PubMed
Prelevic R, Stojadinovic M, Simic D PubMed
Svatek RS, Clinton TN, Wilson CA PubMed
Goldsmith B, Baumann BC, He J PubMed
Pietzak EJ, Sterling ME, Smith ZL PubMed
Lucca I, Hofbauer SL, Leitner CV PubMed
Novara G, Matsumoto K, Kassouf W PubMed
Lago‐Hernandez CA, Feldman H, O'Donnell E PubMed PMC
Fernandez‐Gomez J, Solsona E, Unda M PubMed
Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L PubMed PMC
Abufaraj M, Shariat SF, Foerster B PubMed
Gakis G, Todenhofer T, Braun M PubMed
Millikan R, Dinney C, Swanson D PubMed
Moschini M, Soria F, Klatte T PubMed
Lapham RL, Grignon D, Ro JY. Pathologic prognostic parameters in bladder urothelial biopsy, transurethral resection, and cystectomy specimens. Semin Diagn Pathol 1997; 14: 109–22 PubMed
Prognostic value of albumin to globulin ratio in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer