Contribution of Eisenia andrei earthworms in pathogen reduction during vermicomposting
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RVO 61388971
Institutional Research Concept
QJ1530034
Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic under the NAZV project
20172018
CULS Prague under the CIGA project
PubMed
29978314
DOI
10.1007/s11356-018-2662-2
PII: 10.1007/s11356-018-2662-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biowaste, Earthworm, Eisenia, Immunity, Microbiome, Pathogen, Pattern recognition receptor, Vermicompost,
- MeSH
- Escherichia coli MeSH
- kompostování metody MeSH
- Oligochaeta mikrobiologie fyziologie MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie * MeSH
- střevní mikroflóra * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
Vermicomposting is a process of degradation of biowaste which involves complex interactions between earthworms and microorganisms. This process lacks a thermophilic stage and thus, the possible presence of pathogens poses a potential health hazard. To assess the contribution of earthworms during the selective reduction of various pathogens, apple pomace substrate was artificially inoculated with Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., thermotolerant coliform bacteria, and Enterococci. The artificial bacterial load did not influence the weight, reproduction, or intestinal enzymatic activity of the earthworms, but it caused reversible histological changes to the epithelial layer and chloragogen tissue of their intestines. The reduction of pathogenic Enterococci and E. coli from the substrate was accelerated by earthworms (63-fold, 77-fold, and 840-fold for Enterococci and 6-fold, 36-fold, and 7-fold for E. coli inoculated substrates after 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively). Moreover, the rapid elimination of Salmonella spp. was supported by the upregulated expression of two pattern recognition receptors which bind lipopolysaccharide, coelomic cytolytic factor, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein. Further, the microbiomes of the intestine and the composting substrate differed significantly. Graphical abstract.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Dev Comp Immunol. 2016 Apr;57:67-74 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2014 Sep;168:240-4 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2002 Aug;84(1):57-61 PubMed
Dev Comp Immunol. 2009 Aug;33(8):932-8 PubMed
CSH Protoc. 2008 Jul 01;2008:pdb.top50 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:337-345 PubMed
J Environ Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):105-13 PubMed
Immunol Lett. 1998 Jan;60(1):23-9 PubMed
J Environ Qual. 2018 Jan;47(1):16-29 PubMed
Environ Microbiol. 2015 Jun;17(6):1884-96 PubMed
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Oct 1;407(20):5411-6 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Nov;91(11):null PubMed
Environ Pollut. 2014 Oct;193:22-28 PubMed
Dev Comp Immunol. 2016 Jan;54(1):1-6 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Jan 4;1337(1):123-32 PubMed
Dev Comp Immunol. 2006;30(4):381-92 PubMed
Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):783-801 PubMed
Dev Comp Immunol. 2013 Dec;41(4):694-702 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D633-42 PubMed
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 Mar 20;89(6):670-9 PubMed
Microbiol Res. 2009;164(3):260-6 PubMed
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Oct 08;15:204 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Oct;146:345-354 PubMed
Rev Argent Microbiol. 1995 Oct-Dec;27(4):210-3 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Oct;102(20):9633-7 PubMed
Waste Manag. 2017 Jun;64:51-62 PubMed
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:169-89 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 01;8(11):e79257 PubMed
Gene. 1997 May 20;191(1):97-102 PubMed