The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
PubMed
30033259
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.037
PII: S0928-4931(17)34462-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Biocompatibility, Polyaniline, Polypyrrole,
- MeSH
- Aniline Compounds * adverse effects pharmacology MeSH
- NIH 3T3 Cells MeSH
- Embryoid Bodies metabolism pathology MeSH
- Erythropoiesis drug effects MeSH
- Myocytes, Cardiac metabolism pathology MeSH
- Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells metabolism pathology MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Polymers * adverse effects pharmacology MeSH
- Pyrroles * adverse effects pharmacology MeSH
- Materials Testing * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Aniline Compounds * MeSH
- polyaniline MeSH Browser
- Polymers * MeSH
- polypyrrole MeSH Browser
- Pyrroles * MeSH
Conducting polymers (CP), namely polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy), are promising materials applicable for the use as biointerfaces as they intrinsically combine electronic and ionic conductivity. Although a number of works have employed PANI or PPy in the preparation of copolymers, composites, and blends with other polymers, there is no systematic study dealing with the comparison of their fundamental biological properties. The present study, therefore, compares the biocompatibility of PANI and PPy in terms of cytotoxicity (using NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells) and embryotoxicity (their impact on erythropoiesis and cardiomyogenesis within embryonic bodies). The novelty of the study lies not only in the fact that embryotoxicity is presented for the first time for both studied polymers, but also in the elimination of inter-laboratory variations within the testing, such variation making the comparison of previously published works difficult. The results clearly show that there is a bigger difference between the biocompatibility of the respective polymers in their salt and base forms than between PANI and PPy as such. PANI and PPy can, therefore, be similarly applied in biomedicine when solely their biological properties are considered. Impurity content detected by mass spectroscopy is presented. These results can change the generally accepted opinion of the scientific community on better biocompatibility of PPy in comparison with PANI.
Centre of Polymer Systems Tomas Bata University in Zlin 760 01 Zlin Czech Republic
Institute of Experimental Biology Faculty of Science Masaryk University 625 00 Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org