The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
30033259
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.037
PII: S0928-4931(17)34462-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biocompatibility, Polyaniline, Polypyrrole,
- MeSH
- aniliny * škodlivé účinky farmakologie MeSH
- buňky NIH 3T3 MeSH
- embryoidní tělíska metabolismus patologie MeSH
- erytropoéza účinky léků MeSH
- kardiomyocyty metabolismus patologie MeSH
- myší embryonální kmenové buňky metabolismus patologie MeSH
- myši MeSH
- polymery * škodlivé účinky farmakologie MeSH
- pyrroly * škodlivé účinky farmakologie MeSH
- testování materiálů * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- aniliny * MeSH
- polyaniline MeSH Prohlížeč
- polymery * MeSH
- polypyrrole MeSH Prohlížeč
- pyrroly * MeSH
Conducting polymers (CP), namely polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy), are promising materials applicable for the use as biointerfaces as they intrinsically combine electronic and ionic conductivity. Although a number of works have employed PANI or PPy in the preparation of copolymers, composites, and blends with other polymers, there is no systematic study dealing with the comparison of their fundamental biological properties. The present study, therefore, compares the biocompatibility of PANI and PPy in terms of cytotoxicity (using NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells) and embryotoxicity (their impact on erythropoiesis and cardiomyogenesis within embryonic bodies). The novelty of the study lies not only in the fact that embryotoxicity is presented for the first time for both studied polymers, but also in the elimination of inter-laboratory variations within the testing, such variation making the comparison of previously published works difficult. The results clearly show that there is a bigger difference between the biocompatibility of the respective polymers in their salt and base forms than between PANI and PPy as such. PANI and PPy can, therefore, be similarly applied in biomedicine when solely their biological properties are considered. Impurity content detected by mass spectroscopy is presented. These results can change the generally accepted opinion of the scientific community on better biocompatibility of PPy in comparison with PANI.
Centre of Polymer Systems Tomas Bata University in Zlin 760 01 Zlin Czech Republic
Institute of Experimental Biology Faculty of Science Masaryk University 625 00 Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org