Cost-effectiveness of optimized adherence to prevention guidelines in European patients with coronary heart disease: Results from the EUROASPIRE IV survey
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30172478
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.104
PII: S0167-5273(18)32931-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Coronary heart disease, Cost-effectiveness, EUROASPIRE, Guidelines, Secondary prevention,
- MeSH
- analýza nákladů a výnosů metody normy MeSH
- dodržování směrnic ekonomika normy MeSH
- koronární nemoc ekonomika epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rozhodovací stromy * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of optimized guideline adherence in patients with a history of coronary heart disease. METHODS: An individual-based decision tree model was developed using the SMART risk score tool which estimates the 10-year risk for recurrent vascular events in patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD). Analyses were based on the EUROASPIRE IV survey. Outcomes were expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Data from 4663 patients from 13 European countries were included in the analyses. The mean estimated 10-year risk for a recurrent vascular event decreased from 20.13% to 18.61% after optimized guideline adherence. Overall, an ICER of 52,968€/QALY was calculated. The ICER lowered to 29,093€/QALY when only considering high-risk patients (≥20%) with decreasing ICERs in higher risk patients. Also, a dose-response relationship was seen with lower ICERs in older patients and in those patients with higher risk reductions. A less stringent LDL target (<2.5 mmol/L vs. <1.8 mmol/L) lowered the ICER to 32,591€/QALY and intensifying cholesterol treatment in high-risk patients (≥20%) instead of high-cholesterol patients lowered the ICER to 28,064€/QALY. An alternative method, applying risk reductions to the CVD events instead of applying risk reductions to the risk factors lowered the ICER to 31,509€/QALY. CONCLUSION: Depending on the method used better or worse ICERs were found. In addition, optimized guidelines adherence is more cost-effective in higher risk patients, in patients with higher risk reductions and when using a less strict LDL-C target. Current analyses advice to maximize guidelines adherence in particular patient subgroups.
Cardiology Unit Department of Medicine Solna Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Clinic for Internal Medicine Intermedica Nis Serbia
Department of Cardiology National Heart Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Cardiology Shupyk's National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Kiev Ukraine
Department of Heart Failure and Valve Disease Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
Department of Internal Medicine Ghent University Belgium
Department of Public Health Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Institut Pasteur de Lille Université de Lille France
University Hospital Centre Zagreb School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
University of Latvia Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga Latvia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org