The direct costs of multiple sclerosis-study in the Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Excellence project
UHK
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Long-term development plan
UHHK
PubMed
30178269
DOI
10.1007/s10072-018-3551-7
PII: 10.1007/s10072-018-3551-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Czech Republic, Direct costs, Multiple sclerosis, Neurological disease,
- MeSH
- hospitalizace ekonomika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náklady a analýza nákladů MeSH
- osobní újma zaviněná nemocí * MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza ekonomika epidemiologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that is often disabling and for which there is currently no cure, though disease-modifying treatment is now available. The aim of this study is to describe the current values of the direct costs of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the Czech Republic. METHODS: Attention is focused on direct medical costs. The costs were monitored in the Czech Republic among 5673 patients in the period between 2011 and 2015. These costs included complex, special and targeted visits at the neurologist, blood collection and the costs of hospitalisation. The results refer to the diagnoses according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. The attention is focused on MS G35 (NS; brain stem; spinal cord; disseminated; generalised). RESULTS: The average total direct costs per patient per year are 4838.1 €. Not every patient has to be hospitalised during the year, and not every patient has prescribed medication. According to the above data, 12% of patients are hospitalised and 55% of patients are prescribed medication. The minimum average cost per patient without medication and hospitalisation is 54.1 €. CONCLUSION: Cost evaluation across countries is difficult due to the different evidence. If only selected direct costs considered in this study are compared, the absolute economics burden increases over time. The only statistically significant difference in the average price and the time spent is between 2012 and 2013, where the correlation value is 0.597.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Med Econ. 2013;16(5):639-47 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(4):513-20 PubMed
Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1131-8 PubMed
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Sep 11;11:2349-54 PubMed
Mult Scler. 2012 May;18(5):662-8 PubMed
Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):907-11 PubMed
Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(2_suppl):41-52 PubMed
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;21(2):180-91 PubMed
Neurol Sci. 2015 Feb;36(2):227-34 PubMed
Lancet Neurol. 2004 Feb;3(2):104-10 PubMed
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Nov;18(8):979-986 PubMed
Neurology. 2008 Jul 8;71(2):129-35 PubMed
Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Mar;9(5):A387-94 PubMed
Neurology. 2015 May 26;84(21):2185-92 PubMed
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12(9):903-11 PubMed
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):451-8 PubMed
Mult Scler. 2017 Jul;23(8):1123-1136 PubMed
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002 Jul;104(3):182-91 PubMed
Neurol Sci. 2016 Dec;37(12):1917-1922 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2007 Apr;61(4):288-99 PubMed
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 4;54(3):1123-1133 PubMed