Sport motivation and doping in adolescent athletes
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30286200
PubMed Central
PMC6171920
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0205222
PII: PONE-D-16-44747
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- doping ve sportu psychologie MeSH
- látky zvyšující výkon škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- motivace MeSH
- mravy MeSH
- postoj MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- sportovci psychologie MeSH
- sporty psychologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- látky zvyšující výkon MeSH
BACKGROUND: Although performance-enhancing drugs appear to be prevalent in adolescent sports, relatively little attention has been paid to why adolescent athletes decide to use these drugs. In this study, we examine doping among adolescents from a motivational perspective and explore how motivational variables, such as achievement goal orientations and the perceived self-determination of sports activities, may be related to moral attitudes, doping intentions and doping behavior in adolescents who participate in competitive sports. METHODOLOGY: The study included 1035 adolescents participating in competitive sports from all regions of the Czech Republic (mean age = 16.3 years). The respondents completed a battery of questionnaires assessing their achievement goal orientations (task, ego), sports motivation at various levels of self-determination (intrinsic motivation, external regulation, amotivation), moral attitudes toward sport competition (acceptance of cheating, keeping winning in proportion, attitudes toward doping), doping intentions and doping behavior. A structural equation model was used to test the relations among motivational variables, attitudes, intentions and doping behavior. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Our analyses indicated a good fit with the proposed model, which explained 59% of the variance in doping intentions and 17.6% of the variance in doping behavior. Within the model, task orientation was positively associated with intrinsic motivation and lower amotivation, whereas ego orientation was positively associated with extrinsic regulation and amotivation. Furthermore, intrinsic motivation was positively associated with keeping winning in proportion and negatively associated with acceptance of cheating and attitudes toward doping; the less self-determined forms of motivation showed opposite relationships. However, only the acceptance of cheating and attitudes toward doping were related to doping intention, which subsequently predicted doping behavior. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results provide further evidence that sports motivation represents a psychological variable that should be considered in anti-doping policies, programs, and interventions aimed at the adolescent population because motivation was linked to the doping-related attitudinal variables and also partially mediated the effect of achievement goal orientations in this regard. On the basis of these results, we may argue that the focus on intrinsic enjoyment, self-referenced criteria of success and self-improvement may be related to more negative attitudes toward doping and cheating, lower doping intentions and less frequent doping behavior, whereas the emphasis on competition, comparison with others and external motivation appear to be related to the opposite outcomes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ehrnborg C, Rosén T. The psychology behind doping in sport. Growth hormone & IGF research. 2009. August 31;19(4):285–7. 10.1016/j.ghir.2009.04.003 PubMed DOI
Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Pope HG. Long-term psychiatric and medical consequences of anabolic–androgenic steroid abuse: A looming public health concern?. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2008. November 1;98(1):1–2. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.004 PubMed DOI PMC
Maravelias C, Dona A, Stefanidou M, Spiliopoulou C. Adverse effects of anabolic steroids in athletes: a constant threat. Toxicology letters. 2005. September 15;158(3):167–75. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.06.005 PubMed DOI
World Anti-Doping Agency (2014): 2014 Anti-Doping Testing Figures Report. [staženo 30.7. 2015 z https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/wada_2014_anti-doping-testing-figures_full-report_en.pdf]
Ntoumanis N, Ng JY, Barkoukis V, Backhouse S. Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2014. November 1;44(11):1603–24. 10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4 PubMed DOI
Anderson S. J., Bolduc S. P., Coryllos E., Griesemer B., McLain L., Rowland T. W, Risser W. L. (1997): Adolescents and anabolic steroids: a subject review. Pediatrics 99, 904–908. PubMed
Kindlundh AM, Hagekull B, Isacson DG, Nyberg F. Adolescent use of anabolic—androgenic steroids and relations to self-reports of social, personality and health aspects. The European Journal of Public Health. 2001. September 1;11(3):322–8. 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.322 PubMed DOI
Blatný M, Hrdlicka M, Sobotková V, Jelínek M. Prevalence antisocialního chovani ceskych adolescentu z mestskych oblasti. Ceskoslovenská psychologie. 2006. July 1;50(4):297.
Yesalis CE, Bahrke MS. Doping among adolescent athletes. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2000. March 31;14(1):25–35. 10.1053/beem.2000.0051 PubMed DOI
Johnson MD, Jay MS, Shoup B, Rickert VI. Anabolic steroid use by male adolescents. Pediatrics. 1989. June 1;83(6):921–4. PubMed PubMed
Kindlundh AM, Isacson DG, Berglund L, Nyberg F. Doping among high school students in Uppsala, Sweden: A presentation of the attitudes, distribution, side effects, and extent of use. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 1998. January 1;26(1):71–4. 10.1177/14034948980260010201 PubMed DOI
Lucidi F, Zelli A, Mallia L, Grano C, Russo PM, Violani C. The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents' use of doping substances. Journal of sports sciences. 2008. March 1;26(5):447–56. 10.1080/02640410701579370 PubMed DOI
Pedersen W, Wichstrøm L. Adolescents, doping agents, and drug use: A community study. Journal of Drug Issues. 2001. April 1;31(2):517–41. 10.1177/002204260103100208 DOI
Sas-Nowosielski K. The abuse of anabolic-androgenic steroids by Polish school-aged adolescents. Biology of Sport. 2006. January 1;23(3):225.
Zelli A, Mallia L, Lucidi F. The contribution of interpersonal appraisals to a social-cognitive analysis of adolescents' doping use. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2010. July 31;11(4):304–11. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.02.008 DOI
Laure P, Binsinger C. Doping prevalence among preadolescent athletes: a 4-year follow-up. British journal of sports medicine. 2007. October 1;41(10):660–3. 10.1136/bjsm.2007.035733 PubMed DOI PMC
Irving LM, Wall M, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Steroid use among adolescents: findings from Project EAT. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2002. April 30;30(4):243–52. 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00414-1 PubMed DOI
Pedersen W, Wichstrøm L, Blekesaune M. Violent Behaviors, Violent Victimization, and Doping Agents A Normal Population Study of Adolescents. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2001. August 1;16(8):808–32. 10.1177/088626001016008005 DOI
Knop PD. European trends in youth sport: a report from 11 European countries. European Journal of Physical Education. 1996. January 1;1(1–2):36–45. 10.1080/1740898960010104 DOI
Ehrnborg C, Rosén T. The psychology behind doping in sport. Growth hormone & IGF research. 2009. August 31;19(4):285–7. 10.1016/j.ghir.2009.04.003 PubMed DOI
Petróczi A. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2007. November 9;2(1):1 10.1186/1747-597X-2-34 PubMed DOI PMC
Lentillon-Kaestner V, Carstairs C. Doping use among young elite cyclists: a qualitative psychosociological approach. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2010. April 1;20(2):336–45. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00885.x PubMed DOI
Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H, Rodafinos A. Motivational and sportspersonship profiles of elite athletes in relation to doping behavior. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2011. June 30;12(3):205–12. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.10.003 DOI
Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H, Rodafinos A. Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: An integrated approach. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2013. October 1;23(5):e330–40 PubMed
Chan DK, Dimmock JA, Donovan RJ, Hardcastle SA, Lentillon-Kaestner V, Hagger MS. Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: A perspective from the trans-contextual model. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2015. May 31;18(3):315–22. 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.001 PubMed DOI
Chan DK, Lentillon-Kaestner V, Dimmock JA, Donovan RJ, Keatley DA, Hardcastle SJ, et al. Self-control, self-regulation, and doping in sport: a test of the strength-energy model. Journal of sport & exercise psychology. 2015. April;37(2):199–206. 10.1123/jsep.2014-0250 PubMed DOI
Hodge K, Hargreaves EA, Gerrard D, Lonsdale C. Psychological mechanisms underlying doping attitudes in sport: Motivation and moral disengagement. Journal of sport & exercise psychology. 2013. August 1;35(4):419–32. 10.1123/jsep.35.4.419 PubMed DOI
Zucchetti G, Candela F, Villosio C. Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2015. February 28;26(2):162–8. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.021 PubMed DOI
Lazuras L, Barkoukis V, Tsorbatzoudis H. Toward an integrative model of doping use: an empirical study with adolescent athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2015. February; 37(1): 37–50. 10.1123/jsep.2013-0232 PubMed DOI
Gucciardi DF, Jalleh G, Donovan RJ. An examination of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011. November; 14(6): 469–476. 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.009 PubMed DOI
Morente-Sánchez J, Zabala M. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine. 2013. June; 43(6): 395–411. 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x PubMed DOI
Fishbein M, Cappella JN. The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of communication. 2006. August 4; 56(s1): S1–S17. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00280.x DOI
Fishbein M. A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Medical Decision Making. 2008. November 17; 28(6), 834–844. 10.1177/0272989X08326092 PubMed DOI PMC
Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological review. 1984. July;91(3):328 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328 DOI
Allen J, Taylor J, Dimeo P, Dixon S, Robinson L. Predicting elite Scottish athletes’ attitudes toward doping: examining the contribution of achievement goals and motivational climate. Journal of sports sciences. 2015. May 28;33(9):899–906. 10.1080/02640414.2014.976588 PubMed DOI
Sas-Nowosielski K, Swiatkowska L. Goal orientations and attitudes toward doping. International journal of sports medicine. 2008. July;29(07):607–12. 10.1055/s-2007-965817 PubMed DOI
Vealey RS, Hayashi SW, Garner-Holman M, Giacobbi P. Sources of sport-confidence: Conceptualization and instrument development. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1998. March 1;20:54–80.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 2000. January;55(1):68 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 PubMed DOI
Ntoumanis N, Standage M. Morality in sport: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2009; 21(4): 365–380. 10.1080/10413200903036040 DOI
Vallerand RJ, Losier GF. An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of applied sport psychology. 1999; 11(1): 142–169.
Dweck C. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House; 2006. February 28.
Pintrich PR. Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology. 2000. September;92(3):544 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544 DOI
Kavussanu M, Ntoumanis N. Participation in sport and moral functioning: Does ego orientation mediate their relationship?. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2003;25:501–18.
Duda JL, Olson LK, Templin TJ. The relationship of task and ego orientation to sportsmanship attitudes and the perceived legitimacy of injurious acts. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1991. March 1;62(1):79–87. 10.1080/02701367.1991.10607522 PubMed DOI
Ntoumanis N. Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self-determination theory in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2001;19(6): 397–409. 10.1080/026404101300149357 PubMed DOI
Duda JL, Chi L, Newton ML, Walling MD, Catley D. Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport. International journal of sport psychology. 1995; 26(1): 40–63.
Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of educationa psychology. 2003;95(1): 97.
World Anti-Doping Agency. The 2015 Prohibiter List. World Anti-Doping Agency; 2015. Downloaded from https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/resources/files/wada-2015-prohibited-list-en.pdf.
Petróczi A, Aidman E. Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009. May 31;10(3):390–6. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.11.001 DOI
Slepička P, Slepičková I. Social Aspects of Doping and Antidoping Prevention Possibilities in Children and Youth. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica. 1996; 32: 23–34.
Lee MJ, Whitehead J, Ntoumanis N. Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007. May 31;8(3):369–92. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.002 DOI
Roberts GC, Treasure DC, Balague G. Achievement goals in sport: The development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1998. March 8; 16(4), 337–347. 10.1080/02640419808559362 PubMed DOI
Mallett C, Kawabata M, Newcombe P, Otero-Forero A, Jackson S. Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007. September 30;8(5):600–14. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.005 DOI
Pelletier LG, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Tuson KM, Briere NM, Blais MR. Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology. 1995. March 1;17:35–53.
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012. May; 48(2): 1–36.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6(1):1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI
MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods. 1996; 1(2): 130–149. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 DOI
Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural equation modeling. 2004; 11(3): 320–341. 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 DOI
Jalleh G, Donovan RJ, Jobling I. Predicting attitude toward performance enhancing substance use: A comprehensive test of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2014; 17(6): 574–579. 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.249 PubMed DOI
World Anti-Doping Agency. Dangers of doping: Get the facts. World Anti-doping Agency; 2017. Downloaded from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/education-and-prevention/dangers-of-doping-get-the-facts.
Czech Anti-doping Comittee. Education. Czech Antidoping Comittee; 2017. Downloaded from http://www.antidoping.cz/vzdelavani.php.
Coakley JJ. Sport in society: issues & controversies. McGraw-Hill; 1997.
Petróczi A, Aidman EV, Hussain I, Deshmukh N, Nepusz T, Uvacsek M, et al. Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping. PloS one. 2010; 5(5): e10457 10.1371/journal.pone.0010457 PubMed DOI PMC
Pluim B. A doping sinner is not always a cheat. British journal of sports medicine. 2008; 42(7): 549–550. PubMed
Derenne JL, Beresin EV. Body image, media, and eating disorders. Academic psychiatry. 2006. May 1;30(3):257–61. 10.1176/appi.ap.30.3.257 PubMed DOI
Alderman MK. Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Routledge; 2013.