Anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment and disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cohort study
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30298572
DOI
10.1111/ene.13824
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- clinical outcomes, immunomodulation, multiple sclerosis, observational study, primary progressive,
- MeSH
- antiflogistika terapeutické užití MeSH
- chronicko-progresivní roztroušená skleróza farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- postižení MeSH
- posuzování pracovní neschopnosti MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antiflogistika MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- ocrelizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment options in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) are scarce and, with the exception of ocrelizumab, anti-inflammatory agents have failed to show efficacy in ameliorating disability progression. The aim of this study was to investigate a potential effect of anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment on disability outcomes in PPMS. METHODS: Using MSBase, a large, international, observational database, we identified patients with PPMS who were either never treated or treated with a disease-modifying agent. Propensity score matching was used to select subpopulations with similar baseline characteristics. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) outcomes were compared with an intention-to-treat and an as-treated approach in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1284 included patients, 533 were matched (treated, n = 195; untreated n = 338). Median on-study pairwise-censored follow-up was 3.4 years (quartiles 1.2-5.5). No difference in the hazard of experiencing 3-month confirmed EDSS progression events was observed between the groups [hazard ratio (HR), 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-1.7, P = 0.87]. We did not find significant differences in the hazards of confirmed EDSS improvement (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.6, P = 0.91) or reaching a confirmed EDSS step ≥7 (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6, P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis of disease-modifying agents suggests that these therapies have no substantial effect on short- to medium-term disability outcomes in PPMS.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels Belgium
CORe Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neuroscience and Sense Organs University of Bari Bari Italy
Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC
Department of Neurology Box Hill Hospital Monash University Melbourne VIC
Department of Neurology John Hunter Hospital Newcastle NSW
Department of Neurology Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne VIC
Department of Neuroscience Central Clinical School Alfred Hospital Monash University Melbourne VIC
Department of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Sciences University G d'Annunzio Chieti Italy
Flinders Medical Centre Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia
Hôpital Notre Dame Montreal Quebec
Hospedale P A Micone Genova Italy
Hospital de Galdakao Usansolo Galdakao Spain
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Seville Spain
Hôtel Dieu de Lévis Lévis Quebec Canada
Neuro Rive Sud Hôpital Charles LeMoyne Greenfield Park Quebec
Neurology Unit ASUR Marche AV3 Macerata
Nuovo Ospedale Civile S Agostino Estense Modena
Orbis Medical Center Sittard The Netherlands
School of Medicine and Public Health University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW Australia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org