Disease-modifying treatment and disability progression in subclasses of patients with primary progressive MS: results from the Big MS Data Network
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39643429
PubMed Central
PMC12171517
DOI
10.1136/jnnp-2024-334700
PII: jnnp-2024-334700
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS,
- MeSH
- chronicko-progresivní roztroušená skleróza * farmakoterapie patofyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- posuzování pracovní neschopnosti MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in people affected by primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is limited. Whether specific subgroups may benefit more from DMT in a real-world setting remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the potential effect of DMT on disability worsening among patients with PPMS stratified by different disability trajectories. METHODS: Within the framework of the Big MS Data network, we merged data from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, the Swedish and Italian MS registries, and MSBase. We identified patients with PPMS that started DMT or were never treated during the observed period. Subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics were selected by propensity score matching. Disability outcomes were analysed in time-to-recurrent event analyses, which were repeated in subclasses with different disability trajectories determined by latent class mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 3243 included patients, we matched 739 treated and 1330 untreated patients with a median follow-up of 3 years after pairwise censoring. No difference in the risk of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) was observed between the groups in the fully matched dataset (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.23, p=0.127). However, we found a lower risk for CDW among the class of treated patients with an aggressive disability trajectory (n=360, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92, p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous studies, our data suggest that DMT does not ameliorate disability worsening in PPMS, in general. However, we observed a beneficial effect of DMT on disability worsening in patients with aggressive predicted disability trajectories.
Academic MS Center Zuyd Department of Neurology Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard Geleen Netherlands
Amiri Hospital Kuwait City Kuwait
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes Rennes France
Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides Saint Jerome Quebec Canada
CHU de Montpellier MS Unit University of Montpellier Montpellier France
CHU Lille CRCSEP Lille Université de Lille Lille France
Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
Department of Clinical Epidemiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Clinical Research University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Department of Health Sciences Section of Biostatistics University of Genoa Genova Italy
Department of Neurology Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Toulouse France
Department of Neurology Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul Lille France
Department of Neurology Nancy University Hospital Université de Lorraine Nancy France
Department of Neurology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
Department of Neurology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Department of Neurosciences Box Hill Hospital Box Hill Victoria Australia
Eastern Health Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation against multiple sclerosis Lyon France
Hôpital Notre Dame CHUM and Universite de Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain
Hotel Dieu de Levis Levis Quebec Canada
Hunter Medical Research Institute University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia
Hunter New England Health John Hunter Hospital Newcastle New South Wales Australia
Independent Healthcare and Real World Evidence Consultant Zug Switzerland
MSBase Foundation Melbourne Victoria Australia
Neurocentre Magendie Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux France
Neurology AP HP Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France
Neurology Galdakao Hospital Spain Spain
Neurosciences Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain
Service de Neurologie CHU de Bordeaux Bordeaux France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Miller DH, Leary SM. Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:903–12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70243-0. PubMed DOI
Amezcua L. Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Continuum (Mount Lawley) 2022;28:1083–103. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001157. DOI
Koch M, Kingwell E, Rieckmann P, et al. The natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology (ECronicon) 2009;73:1996–2002. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c5b47f. PubMed DOI
Stuve O, Paul F. Progressive multiple sclerosis: desperately seeking remedy. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:840–1. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70181-9. PubMed DOI
Diouf I, Malpas CB, Sharmin S, et al. Variability of the response to immunotherapy among subgroups of patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30:1014–24. doi: 10.1111/ene.15706. PubMed DOI PMC
Watson C, Thirumalai D, Barlev A, et al. Treatment Patterns and Unmet Need for Patients with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Survey Results from 2016 to 2021. Neurol Ther. 2023;12:1961–79. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00532-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:209–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606468. PubMed DOI
Lublin F, Miller DH, Freedman MS, et al. Oral fingolimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (INFORMS): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1075–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01314-8. PubMed DOI
Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, O’Connor P, et al. Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:14–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.21079. PubMed DOI
Butzkueven H, Spelman T, Horakova D, et al. Risk of requiring a wheelchair in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Data from the ORATORIO trial and the MSBase registry. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29:1082–90. doi: 10.1111/ene.14824. PubMed DOI PMC
Koch MW, Cutter G, Stys PK, et al. Treatment trials in progressive MS--current challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:496–503. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.148. PubMed DOI
Trojano M, Tintore M, Montalban X, et al. Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:105–18. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.188. PubMed DOI
Hughes J, Jokubaitis V, Lugaresi A, et al. Association of Inflammation and Disability Accrual in Patients With Progressive-Onset Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1407–15. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2109. PubMed DOI PMC
Lorscheider J, Kuhle J, Izquierdo G, et al. Anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment and disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26:363–70. doi: 10.1111/ene.13824. PubMed DOI
Portaccio E, Fonderico M, Iaffaldano P, et al. Disease-Modifying Treatments and Time to Loss of Ambulatory Function in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:869–78. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1929. PubMed DOI PMC
Hillert J, Magyari M, Soelberg Sørensen P, et al. Treatment Switching and Discontinuation Over 20 Years in the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network. Front Neurol. 2021;12:647811. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.647811. PubMed DOI PMC
Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Butzkueven H, et al. Early treatment delays long-term disability accrual in RRMS: Results from the BMSD network. Mult Scler. 2021;27:1543–55. doi: 10.1177/13524585211010128. PubMed DOI
Vukusic S, Casey R, Rollot F, et al. Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP): A unique multimodal nationwide MS registry in France. Mult Scler. 2020;26:118–22. doi: 10.1177/1352458518815602. PubMed DOI
Confavreux C, Compston DA, Hommes OR, et al. EDMUS, a European database for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1992;55:671–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.8.671. PubMed DOI PMC
Hillert J, Stawiarz L. The Swedish MS registry – clinical support tool and scientific resource. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132:11–9. doi: 10.1111/ane.12425. PubMed DOI PMC
Trojano M, Bergamaschi R, Amato MP, et al. The Italian multiple sclerosis register. Neurol Sci. 2019;40:155–65. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3610-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Butzkueven H, Chapman J, Cristiano E, et al. MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12:769–74. doi: 10.1177/1352458506070775. PubMed DOI
Kalincik T, Kuhle J, Pucci E, et al. Data quality evaluation for observational multiple sclerosis registries. Mult Scler. 2017;23:647–55. doi: 10.1177/1352458516662728. PubMed DOI
Signori A, Izquierdo G, Lugaresi A, et al. Long-term disability trajectories in primary progressive MS patients: A latent class growth analysis. Mult Scler. 2018;24:642–52. doi: 10.1177/1352458517703800. PubMed DOI
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–24. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078. DOI
Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity. Neurol (ECronicon) 2005;64:1144–51. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156155.19270.F8. PubMed DOI
Andersen PK, Gill RD. Cox’s Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study. Ann Statist. 1982;10:1100–20. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345976. DOI
Team RDC . Vienna, Austria:: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
Hawker K, O’Connor P, Freedman MS, et al. Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:460–71. doi: 10.1002/ana.21867. PubMed DOI
Amato MP, Fonderico M, Portaccio E, et al. Disease-modifying drugs can reduce disability progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Brain (Bacau) 2020;143:3013–24. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa251. PubMed DOI
Amato MP, Portaccio E. Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2007;259:118–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.06.031. PubMed DOI
Amato MP, Fratiglioni L, Groppi C, et al. Interrater reliability in assessing functional systems and disability on the Kurtzke scale in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:746–8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310052017. PubMed DOI
Goodkin DE, Cookfair D, Wende K, et al. Inter- and intrarater scoring agreement using grades 1.0 to 3.5 of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Neurology (ECronicon) 1992;42:859–63. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.4.859. PubMed DOI