Relations Between the Use of Electronic Health and the Use of General Practitioner and Somatic Specialist Visits in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30404766
PubMed Central
PMC6249507
DOI
10.2196/11322
PII: v20i11e11322
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Norway, cross-sectional study, diabetes mellitus, type 1, eHealth, general practitioners, health care utilization, internet, specialist,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu terapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- internet trendy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- praktičtí lékaři MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- specializace MeSH
- telemedicína metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes and the use of electronic health (eHealth) are increasing. People with diabetes need frequent monitoring and follow-up of health parameters, and eHealth services can be of great value. However, little is known about the association between the use of eHealth and provider-based health care services among people with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of 4 different eHealth platforms (apps, search engines, video services, and social media sites) and associations with the use of provider-based health care visits among people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: We used email survey data collected from 1250 members of the Norwegian Diabetes Association (aged 18 to 89 years) in 2018. Eligible for analyses were the 523 respondents with T1DM. Using descriptive statistics, we estimated the use of eHealth and the use of general practitioners (GPs) and somatic specialist outpatient services. By logistic regressions, we studied the associations between the use of these provider-based health services and the use of eHealth, adjusted for gender, age, education, and self-rated health. RESULTS: Of the sample of 523 people with T1DM, 90.7% (441/486) had visited a GP once or more, and 61.0% (289/474) had visited specialist services during the previous year. Internet search engines (such as Google) were used for health purposes sometimes or often by 84.0% (431/513), apps by 55.4% (285/514), social media (such as Facebook) by 45.2% (232/513), and video services (such as YouTube) by 23.3% (118/506). Participants aged from 18 to 39 years used all forms of eHealth more than people aged 40 years and older, with the exception of social media. The use of search engines was positively associated with the use of somatic specialist services (odds ratio 2.43, 95% CI 1.33-4.45). GP visits were not associated with any kind of eHealth use. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth services are now widely used for health support and health information by people with T1DM, primarily in the form of search engines but often in the form of apps and social media as well. We found a positive association between the use of search engines and specialist visits and that people with T1DM are frequent users of eHealth, GPs, and specialist services. We found no evidence that eHealth reduces the use of provider-based health care; these services seem to be additional rather than alternative. Future research should focus on how health care services can meet and adapt to the high prevalence of eHealth use. Our results also indicate that many patients with T1DM do not visit specialist clinics once a year as recommended. This raises questions about collaboration in health care services and needs to be followed up in future research.
Centre for Quality Improvement and Development University Hospital of North Norway Tromsø Norway
Department of Clinical Medicine UiT The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway
Department of Internal Medicine 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Medical Department Nordland Hospital Bodø Norway
Norwegian Centre for E health Research University Hospital of North Norway Tromsø Norway
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024.S0168-8227(17)30375-3 PubMed DOI
Norwegian Institute of Public Health. [2018-06-16]. Public Health in Norway 2018 https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/dokumenterfiler/rapporter/2018/helsetilstanden-i-norge-2018.pdf .
Solli O, Jenssen T, Kristiansen IS. Diabetes: cost of illness in Norway. BMC Endocr Disord. 2010 Sep 20;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-10-15. 1472-6823-10-15 PubMed DOI PMC
Sandahl K, Nielsen LB, Svensson J, Johannesen J, Pociot F, Mortensen HB, Hougaard P, Broe R, Rasmussen ML, Grauslund J, Peto T, Olsen BS. Increased mortality in a Danish cohort of young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus followed for 24 years. Diabet Med. 2017 Dec;34(3):380–386. doi: 10.1111/dme.13124. PubMed DOI
Jenssen TG, Tonstad S, Claudi T, Midthjell K, Cooper J. The gap between guidelines and practice in the treatment of type 2 diabetes A nationwide survey in Norway. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 May;80(2):314–20. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.025.S0168-8227(08)00007-7 PubMed DOI
Mouland G. [Diabetes in general practice--were treatment goals reached?] Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2014 Jan 28;134(2):168–72. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0375. 3127607 PubMed DOI
Cooper JG, Claudi T, Thordarson HB, Løvaas KF, Carlsen S, Sandberg S, Thue G. Treatment of type 1 diabetes in the specialist health service--data from the Norwegian Diabetes Register for Adults. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Nov 12;133(21):2257–62. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0153. 3095352 PubMed DOI
World Health Organization http://www.who.int/ehealth/en/ [2018-06-16]. eHealth http://www.who.int/ehealth/en/
Wangberg SC, Andreassen HK, Prokosch HU, Santana SM, Sørensen T, Chronaki CE. Relations between internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health. Health Promot Int. 2008 Mar;23(1):70–7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam039.dam039 PubMed DOI
Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, Wynn R. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 10;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53. 1471-2458-7-53 PubMed DOI PMC
Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch HU, Rasmussen J, Santana S, Staniszewski A, Wangberg SC. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 17;10(4):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023. v10i4e42 PubMed DOI PMC
Bujnowska-Fedak MM. Trends in the use of the Internet for health purposes in Poland. BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 27;15:194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1473-3. 10.1186/s12889-015-1473-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2013. [2018-06-16]. Health Online http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
Nölke L, Mensing M, Krämer A, Hornberg C. Sociodemographic and health-(care-)related characteristics of online health information seekers: a cross-sectional German study. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 29;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1423-0. s12889-015-1423-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Sørensen T, Andreassen HK, Wangberg SC. Nasjonalt senter for e-helseforskning. 2014. [2018-06-16]. Prosjektrapport e-helse i Norge 2013 https://ehealthresearch.no/files/documents/Prosjektrapporter/NST-rapport_2014-02_e-helse_i_Norge_2013.pdf .
Broz J, Brabec M, Brozova K, Cibulkova I, Zdarska D, Hartmann D. Professional internet information source used as educational resource for patients with insulin-treated diabetes in the Czech Republic: a 5-year analysis of operations. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2016;128:153. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0946-9. PubMed DOI
Koch-Weser S, Bradshaw YS, Gualtieri L, Gallagher SS. The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and implications for health communication. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:279–93. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522700.930956751 PubMed DOI
AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jun;81(6):363–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12.004.S1386-5056(11)00264-4 PubMed DOI
Catan G, Espanha R, Mendes RV, Toren O, Chinitz D. Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015;4:41. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0040-9. 40 PubMed DOI PMC
Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001 Dec;16(6):671–92. PubMed
Norwegian Directorate of Health. [2018-06-16]. National Professional Guideline for Diabetes: Follow-up, investigation and organization of diabetes care https://helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/diabetes/seksjon?Tittel=oppfolging-utredning-og-organisering-7125 .
The Norwegian Diabetes Association. [2018-06-16]. Årsberetning 2017 https://issuu.com/knutjarle/docs/a_rsberetning_2017_ .
Hansen AH, Bradway M, Broz J, Claudi T, Henriksen O, Wangberg SC, Årsand E. The use of eHealth and provider-based health services by patients with diabetes mellitus: protocol for a cross-sectional study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Oct 31;5(4):e207. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6529. v5i4e207 PubMed DOI PMC
Medlock S, Eslami S, Askari M, Arts DL, Sent D, de Rooij SE, Abu-Hanna A. Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the internet: a survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 08;17(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3749. v17i1e10 PubMed DOI PMC
The Tromsø Study. [2018-06-16]. http://tromsoundersokelsen.uit.no/tromso/
Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Ringberg U, Førde OH. Socio-economic inequalities in health care utilisation in Norway: a population based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 25;12:336. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-336. 1472-6963-12-336 PubMed DOI PMC
Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. J Am Med Assoc. 2012 May 02;307(17):1805–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532.307/17/1805 PubMed DOI
Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Forde OH. The ecology of medical care in Norway: wide use of general practitioners may not necessarily keep patients out of hospitals. J Public Health Res. 2012 Jun 15;1(2):177–83. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2012.e28. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2012.e28. PubMed DOI PMC
Hsieh RW, Chen L, Chen TF, Liang JC, Lin TB, Chen YY, Tsai CC. The association between internet use and ambulatory care-seeking behaviors in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 07;18(12):e319. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5498. v18i12e319 PubMed DOI PMC
Bundorf MK, Wagner TH, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Who searches the internet for health information? Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):819–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00510.x. HESR510 PubMed DOI PMC
Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032.S1386-5056(05)00146-2 PubMed DOI
Fox S. After Dr Google: peer-to-peer health care. Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S224–5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786K.peds.2012-3786K PubMed DOI
Ayers SL, Kronenfeld JJ. Chronic illness and health-seeking information on the Internet. Health (London) 2007 Jul;11(3):327–47. doi: 10.1177/1363459307077547.11/3/327 PubMed DOI
Li J, Theng YL, Foo S. Predictors of online health information seeking behavior: changes between 2002 and 2012. Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):804–814. doi: 10.1177/1460458215595851.1460458215595851 PubMed DOI
Fox S, Purcell K. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2010. [2018-06-16]. Chronic disease and the internet http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/03/24/chronic-disease-and-the-internet/
Lee CJ. Does the internet displace health professionals? J Health Commun. 2008;13(5):450–64. doi: 10.1080/10810730802198839.795326430 PubMed DOI
Bauer AM, Rue T, Keppel GA, Cole AM, Baldwin LM, Katon W. Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools by primary care patients in the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network (WPRN) J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(6):780–8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140108. 27/6/780 PubMed DOI PMC
Campbell RJ, Nolfi DA. Teaching elderly adults to use the Internet to access health care information: before-after study. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jun 30;7(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e19. v7i2e19 PubMed DOI PMC
Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15. PubMed DOI PMC
Takahashi Y, Ohura T, Ishizaki T, Okamoto S, Miki K, Naito M, Akamatsu R, Sugimori H, Yoshiike N, Miyaki K, Shimbo T, Nakayama T. Internet use for health-related information via personal computers and cell phones in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 14;13(4):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1796. v13i4e110 PubMed DOI PMC
Tarver WL, Menser T, Hesse BW, Johnson TJ, Beckjord E, Ford EW, Huerta TR. Growth dynamics of patient-provider internet communication: trend analysis using the Health Information National Trends Survey (2003 to 2013) J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7851. v20i3e109 PubMed DOI PMC
Norwegian Media Barometer 2017. Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway; 2018. [2018-06-16]. https://www.ssb.no/en/kultur-og-fritid/statistikker/medie/aar/2018-04-19 .
Nguyen HT, Nakamura K, Seino K, Vo VT. Association between a wider availability of health information and health care utilization in Vietnam: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 18;19(12):e405. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8328. v19i12e405 PubMed DOI PMC
McMullan M. Patients using the internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006.S0738-3991(05)00315-0 PubMed DOI
Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Aaraas IJ, Førde OH. Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jul;63(612):482–9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X669202. PubMed DOI PMC
Tolonen H, Koponen P, Borodulin K, Männistö S, Peltonen M, Vartiainen E. Differences in participation rates between urban and rural areas are diminishing in Finland. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jan 01;:1403494817748737. doi: 10.1177/1403494817748737. PubMed DOI
Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):643–53. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013.S1047-2797(07)00147-0 PubMed DOI
Langhammer A, Krokstad S, Romundstad P, Heggland J, Holmen J. The HUNT study: participation is associated with survival and depends on socioeconomic status, diseases and symptoms. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 14;12:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-143. 1471-2288-12-143 PubMed DOI PMC
Kristoffersen AE, Fønnebø V, Norheim AJ. Do cancer patients with a poor prognosis use complementary and alternative medicine more often than others? J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Jan;15(1):35–40. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0262. PubMed DOI
Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Schmidt L, Jacobsen SJ. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Sep;49(9):989–95.0895-4356(96)00143-6 PubMed
Reijneveld SA, Stronks K. The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;30(6):1407–14. PubMed
Halbesleben JR, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):913–30. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12002. PubMed DOI PMC