• This record comes from PubMed

Intralaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of major phytocannabinoids

. 2019 May ; 411 (14) : 3069-3079. [epub] 20190320

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

Grant support
RO0419 Ministerstvo Zemědělství

Links

PubMed 30895348
DOI 10.1007/s00216-019-01760-y
PII: 10.1007/s00216-019-01760-y
Knihovny.cz E-resources

This study compares alternative approaches for analyzing phytocannabinoids in different plant materials. Three chromatographic analytical methods (ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric and flame ionization detection) were evaluated regarding selectivity, sensitivity, analytical accuracy, and precision. The performance of the methods was compared and all three methods were demonstrated to be appropriate tools for analyzing phytocannabinoids in cannabis. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection showed slightly better accuracy in determining phytocannabinoid acids, which are often difficult to quantify owing to their limited stability. Aspects of sample preparation, such as material homogenization and extraction, were also considered. A single ultrasonic-assisted ethanolic extraction of dried and powdered plant samples of cannabis was shown to be exhaustive for extracting the samples prior to analysis.

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...