BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to explore the course of labor and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury at the first vaginal birth after cesarean section (fVBAC) in comparison to primiparous vaginal birth (PVB) in women without epidural analgesia and to assess if laboring before the previous cesarean affected these outcomes. METHODS: All fVBACs without epidural analgesia and the subsequent PVBs (controls) between 2012 and 2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from health records and included maternal demographics, gestational age, and labor details (duration of 1st and 2nd stages, labor induction or augmentation, birthweight, operative vaginal birth, estimated blood loss, extent of childbirth trauma) in both groups as well as cervical dilation at the time of previous cesarean in the fVBAC group. Wilcoxon and Chi-square tests were used for data analyses. RESULTS: The study comprised 510 women; 255 fVBACs and 255 controls. The majority of fVBACs were after a pre-labor cesarean section - 177 (69.4%). There was a statistically significant difference in the recorded duration of first stage between the fVBACs and controls (289 vs. 347 min respectively, p < .001). Women were less likely to have an intact perineum in the fVBAC group (29.8 vs. 43.1%, p < 0.01), however, there was no statistically significant difference in anal sphincter injury rates between both groups (2.3 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.76). The groups differed in rates of cervical tears requiring suturing (21.2 vs. 12.9%, p = 0.01). On further subgroup analysis, the duration of first stage of labor was shorter in women who previously had a caesarean section late in labor (≥ 8 cm cervical dilatation) compared to a pre-labor cesarean section, however, there were no differences in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Compared to primiparous women having a vaginal birth, women having their first vaginal birth after a cesarean section have a shorter 1st stage of labor (particularly if the cesarean was performed in advanced labor), a higher risk of sustaining cervical lacerations and perineal trauma. However, there was no difference in the risk of sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries between the study groups.

Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ceske Budejovice Regional Hospital Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Betran A, Torloni M, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu A. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–670. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. PubMed DOI PMC

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(5):e217-ee33. PubMed

Declercq E, Cabral H, Ecker J. The plateauing of cesarean rates in industrialized countries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):322–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1038. PubMed DOI

Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):326. e1–326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. PubMed DOI PMC

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010;191:1–397. PubMed PMC

Hehir MP, Mackie A, Robson MS. Simplified and standardized intrapartum management can yield high rates of successful VBAC in spontaneous labor. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(12):1504–1508. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1220522. PubMed DOI

Dietz HP, Campbell S. Toward normal birth–but at what cost? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(4):439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.021. PubMed DOI

Hehir M, Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, Murphy M, O'herlihy C. Are women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean delivery at increased risk of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2014;121(12):1515–1520. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12706. PubMed DOI

Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):344. e1–344. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.893. PubMed DOI

Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Heinonen S. A prior cesarean section and incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1331–1339. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2006-6. PubMed DOI

Nettle Jonathan A.S., Mcnamara Helen C., Du Plessis Jacobus M. Perineal trauma with vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018;59(3):346–350. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12839. PubMed DOI

Grylka-Baeschlin S, Petersen A, Karch A, Gross MM. Labour duration and timing of interventions in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean section. Midwifery. 2016;34:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.004. PubMed DOI

Jardine JE, Knight HE, Carroll FE, Gurol-Urganci I. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.004. PubMed DOI

Cibils LA, Hendricks CH. Normal labor in vertex presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965;91(3):385–395. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(65)90254-1. PubMed DOI

Inbar R, Mazaaki S, Kalter A, Gat I, Sivan E, Schiff E, et al. Trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) is associated with increased risk for instrumental delivery. J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;37(1):44–47. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1209167. PubMed DOI

Lieberman E, O’donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):S31–S68. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70181-6. PubMed DOI

Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(3):516–520. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70431-4. PubMed DOI

Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population–based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):59. e1–59. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.043. PubMed DOI

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (green-top guideline No. 29) [RCOG website]. 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg29/. Accessed 12 July 2018.

Kalis V, Laine K, De Leeuw J, Ismail K, Tincello D. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG. 2012;119(5):522–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03268.x. PubMed DOI

Jansova M, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Hyncik L, Karbanova J, Rusavy Z. The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(11):1533–1540. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2425-7. PubMed DOI

Jansova M, Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Zemcik R, Lobovsky L, Laine K. Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2164-1. PubMed DOI

Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113(2):195–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00799.x. PubMed DOI

Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2016;123(4):559–568. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13284. PubMed DOI

Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Intrapartum cervical lacerations: characteristics, risk factors, and effects on subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):388. e1–388. e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.034. PubMed DOI

Parikh R, Brotzman S, Anasti JN. Cervical lacerations: some surprising facts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):e17–ee8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.043. PubMed DOI

Hopkins LM, Caughey AB, Glidden DV, Laros RK. Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):455–459. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.007. PubMed DOI

Grantz KL, Gonzalez-Quintero V, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Hinkle SN, Kominiarek MA, et al. Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(2):226. e1–226. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.033. PubMed DOI PMC