Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease and High-Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
31288095
DOI
10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.004
PII: S1083-8791(19)30436-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Allogeneic, Autologous, Cytogenetics, Extramedullary disease, Myeloma, Tandem,
- MeSH
- autologní štěp MeSH
- chromozomální aberace * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * genetika mortalita terapie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- společnosti lékařské MeSH
- transplantace kmenových buněk * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant combined with novel agents continues to be the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and high-risk cytogenetics is not yet defined. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with EMD undergoing single autologous (n = 373), tandem autologous (n = 84), or autologous-allogeneic transplant (n = 31) between 2003 and 2015. At least 1 high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n = 202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) the most frequent. More than 1 high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 54% and 29%, respectively, versus 78% and 49% for standard-risk cytogenetics (P < .001). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, OS and PFS were 70% and 43% for single autologous versus 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (P = .06 and P = .30). In multivariate analysis high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = .003), whereas tandem autologous significantly improved outcome versus single autologous transplant (HRs, .46 and .64; P = .02 and P = .03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival, but results were limited because of small population (HR, .31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with EMD and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous, whereas a tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon France
Charles University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
CHU de Lille LIRIC INSEM U995 Université Lille2 Lille France
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc Brussels Belgium
EBMT Data Office Leiden The Netherlands
EBMT Statistical Unit Leiden The Netherlands
Grand Hôpital de l`Est Francilien Meaux France
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Germany
Hôpital A Michallon Grenoble France
Hôpital Saint Antoine Paris France
Hospital C Panico Tricase Italy
Hospital son LLatzer Palma de Mallorca Spain
ICO Hospital Duran i Reynals Barcelona Spain
Institut Jules Bordet Brussels Belgium
Institut Paoli Calmettes Marseille France
Medizinische Klinik 5 Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Ospedale La Maddalena Palermo Italy
Ospedale San Gerardo Monza Italy
Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
St István and St Laszlo Hospital Budapest Hungary
St Savvas Oncology Hospital Athens Greece
Turku University Hospital Turku Finland
University Hospital Antwerp Edegem Belgium
University Hospital Basel Switzerland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org