Taxi drivers: the role of animals in transporting mycorrhizal fungi
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
Grantová podpora
LO1415
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
31-19-15031S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
K/ZDS/007340, K/ZDS/007344
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
J4-7052
Slovenian Research Agency
P4-008
Slovenian Research Agency
708530 - DISPMIC
European Union's Horizon 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship
CGL2015-69118-C2-2-P - COEXMED-II
Spanish government
QJ1630422
Czech Ministry of Agriculture
0606-00587B
Danish Council for Strategic Research
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
FP1305
COST Action
PubMed
31292712
DOI
10.1007/s00572-019-00906-1
PII: 10.1007/s00572-019-00906-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Biodiversity, Dispersal, Ectomycorrhiza, Fungal traits, Zoochory,
- MeSH
- bezobratlí fyziologie MeSH
- houby fyziologie MeSH
- mykorhiza fyziologie MeSH
- potravní řetězec * MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie MeSH
- symbióza MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi via animals and the importance for the interacting partners' life history as well as for ecosystems is an understudied topic. In this review, we describe the available evidence and the most important knowledge gaps and finally suggest ways to gain the missing information. So far, 33 articles have been published proving a successful transfer of mycorrhizal propagules by animals. The vast majority of research on invertebrates was focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, whereas papers on vertebrates (mainly rodents and artiodactyls) equally addressed ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and AM fungi. Effective dispersal has been mostly shown by the successful inoculation of bait plants and less commonly by spore staining or germination tests. Based on the available data and general knowledge on animal lifestyles, collembolans and oribatid mites may be important in transporting ECM fungal propagules by ectozoochory, whereas earthworms, isopods, and millipedes could mainly transfer AM fungal spores in their gut systems. ECM fungal distribution may be affected by mycophagous dipterans and their hymenopteran parasitoids, while slugs, snails, and beetles could transport both mycorrhizal groups. Vertebrates feeding on fruit bodies were shown to disperse mainly ECM fungi, while AM fungi are transported mostly accidentally by herbivores. The important knowledge gaps include insufficient information on dispersal of fungal propagules other than spores, the role of invertebrates in the dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi, the way in which propagules pass through food webs, and the spatial distances reached by different dispersal mechanisms both horizontally and vertically.
Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Jamnikarjeva 101 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia
Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Biology University of Osijek Cara Hadrijana 8a Osijek Croatia
Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology Szent István University Páter Károly u 1 Gödöllö Hungary
Zobrazit více v PubMed
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(2):1054-1060 PubMed
Environ Pollut. 1990;68(3-4):383-407 PubMed
ISME J. 2016 May;10(5):1228-39 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2019 May;29(3):181-193 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2016 Jul;26(5):489-96 PubMed
Oecologia. 2014 Dec;176(4):1075-86 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Sep;15(9):369-372 PubMed
Oecologia. 1980 Jan;45(3):404-413 PubMed
Nat Commun. 2015 Feb 23;6:6279 PubMed
Mycologia. 1975 Jul-Aug;67(4):741-7 PubMed
Oecologia. 2018 Mar;186(3):655-664 PubMed
Mycol Res. 2007 Nov;111(Pt 11):1345-51 PubMed
Ecology. 2016 Oct;97(10):2824-2833 PubMed
New Phytol. 2009 Jan;181(2):245-248 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66832 PubMed
Mycologia. 2005 Mar-Apr;97(2):329-37 PubMed
Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1120-3 PubMed
Mycologia. 2005 Jul-Aug;97(4):762-9 PubMed
Oecologia. 2002 May;131(4):587-597 PubMed
Oecologia. 1987 Jul;72(4):597-604 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2002 Aug;12(4):181-4 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2008 Feb;18(2):111-4 PubMed
Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1292-302 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2018 Aug;28(5-6):561-565 PubMed
New Phytol. 2006;170(3):581-96 PubMed
Mycologia. 2011 Nov-Dec;103(6):1175-83 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2005 Dec;16(1):67-72 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2018 Dec;27(23):4960-4971 PubMed
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 13;6(4):e18770 PubMed
Mycol Res. 2005 May;109(Pt 5):525-44 PubMed
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Sep;18(9):484-91 PubMed
New Phytol. 2006;169(2):345-54 PubMed
Mycologia. 2018 Jan-Feb;110(1):131-135 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5356 PubMed
Nat Prod Res. 2014;28(20):1709-17 PubMed
Oecologia. 2012 Oct;170(2):395-409 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018 May 1;42(3):293-323 PubMed
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(1):171-9 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;15(4):321-53 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2018 Apr;28(3):221-233 PubMed
Fungal Biol. 2011 Jul;115(7):569-97 PubMed
Mycol Res. 2004 Jul;108(Pt 7):749-58 PubMed
Fungal Genet Biol. 2013 May;54:25-33 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2019 May;29(3):195-205 PubMed
Microb Ecol. 2005 Nov;50(4):518-28 PubMed
Mycorrhiza. 2017 Apr;27(3):165-174 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2019 Jan;28(2):190-202 PubMed
Zookeys. 2018 Dec 3;(801):323-335 PubMed