BACKGROUND: Europe is currently the most active region in the field of pancreatic islet transplantation, and many of the leading groups are actually achieving similar good outcomes. Further collaborative advances in the field require the standardization of islet cell product isolation processes, and this work aimed to identify differences in the human pancreatic islet isolation processes within European countries. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire about critical steps, including donor selection, pancreas processing, pancreas perfusion and digestion, islet counting and culture, islet quality evaluation, microbiological evaluation, and release criteria of the product, was completed by isolation facilities participating at the Ninth International European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) Workshop on Islet-Beta Cell Replacement in Milan. RESULTS: Eleven islet isolation facilities completed the questionnaire. The facilities reported 445 and 53 islet isolations per year over the last 3 years from deceased organ donors and pancreatectomized patients, respectively. This activity resulted in 120 and 40 infusions per year in allograft and autograft recipients, respectively. Differences among facilities emerged in donor selection (age, cold ischemia time, intensive care unit length, amylase concentration), pancreas procurement, isolation procedures (brand and concentration of collagenase, additive, maximum acceptable digestion time), quality evaluation, and release criteria for transplantation (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests, islet numbers, and purity). Moreover, even when a high concordance about the relevance of one parameter was evident, thresholds for the acceptance were different among facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The result highlighted the presence of a heterogeneity in the islet cell product process and product release criteria.

Academic Hospital and Diabetes Research Center Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

Department of Medicine 3 University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Dresden Germany

Department of Nephrology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Netherlands

Department of Transplant Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

Diabetes Center Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Diabetes Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Diabetology Unit ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy

European Genomic Institute for Diabetes University Hospital Lille Lille France

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Genève Switzerland

Islet Transplant Research Group Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences and Oxford Centre for Diabetes University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom

Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden

Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

See more in PubMed

Hilling DE, Bouwman E, Terpstra OT, et al. Effects of donor-, pancreas-, and isolation-related variables on human islet isolation outcome: a systematic review. Cell Transplant. 2014; 23:921–928

Linetsky E, Ricordi C. Regulatory challenges in manufacturing of pancreatic islets. Transplant Proc. 2008; 40:424–426

Shapiro AM, Pokrywczynska M, Ricordi C. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 13:268–277

Piemonti L, Pileggi A. 25 years of the Ricordi Automated Method for islet isolation. CellR4 Repair Replace Regen Reprogram. 2013; 1:e128

Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Hering BJ, et al. International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1318–1330

Wang LJ, Kin T, O’Gorman D, et al. A multicenter study: North American islet donor score in donor pancreas selection for human islet isolation for transplantation. Cell Transplant. 2016; 25:1515–1523

Hering BJ, Clarke WR, Bridges ND, et al.; Clinical Islet Transplantation Consortium. Phase 3 trial of transplantation of human islets in type 1 diabetes complicated by severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39:1230–1240

Lablanche S, Vantyghem MC, Kessler L, et al.; TRIMECO Trial Investigators. Islet transplantation versus insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes with severe hypoglycaemia or poorly controlled glycaemia after kidney transplantation (TRIMECO): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 6:527–537

Henquin JC. Influence of organ donor attributes and preparation characteristics on the dynamics of insulin secretion in isolated human islets. Physiol Rep. 2018; 6

Ponte GM, Pileggi A, Messinger S, et al. Toward maximizing the success rates of human islet isolation: influence of donor and isolation factors. Cell Transplant. 2007; 16:595–607

Nano R, Clissi B, Melzi R, et al. Islet isolation for allotransplantation: variables associated with successful islet yield and graft function. Diabetologia. 2005; 48:906–912

Ricordi C, Goldstein JS, Balamurugan AN, et al. National Institutes of Health-sponsored Clinical Islet Transplantation Consortium phase 3 trial: manufacture of a complex cellular product at eight processing facilities. Diabetes. 2016; 65:3418–3428

NIH CIT Consortium. Purified Human Pancreatic Islets (PHPI) Master Production Batch Record: a standard operating of the NIH Clinical Islet Transplantation Consortium. CellR4 Repair Replace Regen Reprogram. 2014; 2

Ricordi C, Lacy PE, Finke EH, et al. Automated method for isolation of human pancreatic islets. Diabetes. 1988; 37:413–420

Goto M, Eich TM, Felldin M, et al. Refinement of the automated method for human islet isolation and presentation of a closed system for in vitro islet culture. Transplantation. 2004; 78:1367–1375

Robertson GS, Chadwick DR, Contractor H, et al. The optimization of large-scale density gradient isolation of human islets. Acta Diabetol. 1993; 30:93–98

Bucher P, Mathe Z, Morel P, et al. Assessment of a novel two-component enzyme preparation for human islet isolation and transplantation. Transplantation. 2005; 79:91–97

Linetsky E, Bottino R, Lehmann R, et al. Improved human islet isolation using a new enzyme blend, liberase. Diabetes. 1997; 46:1120–1123

O’Gorman D, Kin T, Imes S, et al. Comparison of human islet isolation outcomes using a new mammalian tissue-free enzyme versus collagenase NB-1. Transplantation. 2010; 90:255–259

Min CG, Papas KK. Recent developments in persufflation for organ preservation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018; 23:330–335

Cross SE, Hughes SJ, Partridge CJ, et al. Collagenase penetrates human pancreatic islets following standard intraductal administration. Transplantation. 2008; 86:907–911

Balamurugan AN, Naziruddin B, Lockridge A, et al. Islet product characteristics and factors related to successful human islet transplantation from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) 1999-2010. Am J Transplant. 2014; 14:2595–2606

Bottino R, Balamurugan AN, Tse H, et al. Response of human islets to isolation stress and the effect of antioxidant treatment. Diabetes. 2004; 53:2559–2568

Hart NJ, Powers AC. Use of human islets to understand islet biology and diabetes: progress, challenges and suggestions. Diabetologia. 2019; 62:212–222

Nano R, Bosco D, Kerr-Conte JA, et al. Human islet distribution programme for basic research: activity over the last 5 years. Diabetologia. 2015; 58:1138–1140

Poitout V, Satin LS, Kahn SE, et al. A call for improved reporting of human islet characteristics in research articles. Diabetes. 2019; 68:239–240

Poitout V, Satin LS, Kahn SE, et al. A call for improved reporting of human islet characteristics in research articles. Diabetologia. 2019; 62:209–211

Piemonti L, de Koning EJP, Berney T, et al. Defining outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy: a work in progress. Diabetologia. 2018; 61:1273–1276

Rickels MR, Stock PG, de Koning EJP, et al. Defining outcomes for β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes: a consensus report on the Igls criteria from the IPITA/EPITA opinion leaders workshop. Transplantation. 2018; 102:1479–1486

Rickels MR, Stock PG, de Koning EJP, et al. Defining outcomes for β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes: a consensus report on the Igls criteria from the IPITA/EPITA opinion leaders workshop. Transpl Int. 2018; 31:343–352