Autophagy role(s) in response to oncogenes and DNA replication stress
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31409894
PubMed Central
PMC7206042
DOI
10.1038/s41418-019-0403-9
PII: 10.1038/s41418-019-0403-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- autofagie * MeSH
- autofagozomy účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- fyziologický stres * účinky léků MeSH
- kamptothecin farmakologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové buněčné linie MeSH
- onkogeny * MeSH
- replikace DNA * účinky léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kamptothecin MeSH
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process that captures aberrant intracellular proteins and/or damaged organelles for delivery to lysosomes, with implications for cellular and organismal homeostasis, aging and diverse pathologies, including cancer. During cancer development, autophagy may play both tumour-supporting and tumour-suppressing roles. Any relationships of autophagy to the established oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) and the ensuing DNA damage response (DDR)-mediated anti-cancer barrier in early tumorigenesis remain to be elucidated. Here, assessing potential links between autophagy, RS and DDR, we found that autophagy is enhanced in both early and advanced stages of human urinary bladder and prostate tumorigenesis. Furthermore, a high-content, single-cell-level microscopy analysis of human cellular models exposed to diverse genotoxic insults showed that autophagy is enhanced in cells that experienced robust DNA damage, independently of the cell-cycle position. Oncogene- and drug-induced RS triggered first DDR and later autophagy. Unexpectedly, genetic inactivation of autophagy resulted in RS, despite cellular retention of functional mitochondria and normal ROS levels. Moreover, recovery from experimentally induced RS required autophagy to support DNA synthesis. Consistently, RS due to the absence of autophagy could be partly alleviated by exogenous supply of deoxynucleosides. Our results highlight the importance of autophagy for DNA synthesis, suggesting that autophagy may support cancer progression, at least in part, by facilitating tumour cell survival and fitness under replication stress, a feature shared by most malignancies. These findings have implications for better understanding of the role of autophagy in tumorigenesis, as well as for attempts to manipulate autophagy as an anti-tumour therapeutic strategy.
Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens Athens Greece
Biotech Research and Innovation Centre University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Danish Cancer Society Research Center Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Molecular Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:124–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014. PubMed DOI PMC
Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147:728–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026. PubMed DOI
Hewitt G, Korolchuk VI. Repair, reuse, recycle: the expanding role of autophagy in genome maintenance. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:340–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.011. PubMed DOI
Parzych KR, Ariosa A, Mari M, Klionsky DJ. A newly characterized vacuolar serine carboxypeptidase, Atg42/Ybr139w, is required for normal vacuole function and the terminal steps of autophagy in the yeast Saccharomycescerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29:1089–99. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0516. PubMed DOI PMC
Komatsu M, Ichimura Y. Physiological significance of selective degradation of p62 by autophagy. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:1374–8. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.017. PubMed DOI
Bjorkoy G, Lamark T, Pankiv S, Overvatn A, Brech A, Johansen T. Monitoring autophagic degradation of p62/SQSTM1. Methods Enzymol. 2009;452:181–97. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03612-4. PubMed DOI
Duran A, Linares JF, Galvez AS, Wikenheiser K, Flores JM, Diaz-Meco MT, et al. The signaling adaptor p62 is an important NF-kappaB mediator in tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:343–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.02.001. PubMed DOI
Kimura S, Fujita N, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Monitoring autophagy in mammalian cultured cells through the dynamics of LC3. Methods Enzymol. 2009;452:1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03601-X. PubMed DOI
Liu EY, Xu N, O’Prey J, Lao LY, Joshi S, Long JS, et al. Loss of autophagy causes a synthetic lethal deficiency in DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:773–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409563112. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang Y, Zhang N, Zhang L, Li R, Fu W, Ma K, et al. Autophagy regulates chromatin ubiquitination in DNA damage response through elimination of SQSTM1/p62. Mol Cell. 2016;63:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.027. PubMed DOI
Liang XH, Jackson S, Seaman M, Brown K, Kempkes B, Hibshoosh H, et al. Induction of autophagy and inhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1. Nature. 1999;402:672–6. doi: 10.1038/45257. PubMed DOI
Karantza-Wadsworth V, Patel S, Kravchuk O, Chen G, Mathew R, Jin S, et al. Autophagy mitigates metabolic stress and genome damage in mammary tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1621–35. doi: 10.1101/gad.1565707. PubMed DOI PMC
Katayama M, Kawaguchi T, Berger MS, Pieper RO. DNA damaging agent-induced autophagy produces a cytoprotective adenosine triphosphate surge in malignant glioma cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:548–58. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402030. PubMed DOI
Rosenfeldt MT, O’Prey J, Morton JP, Nixon C, MacKay G, Mrowinska A, et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic tumour development. Nature. 2013;504:296–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12865. PubMed DOI
Lorin S, Hamai A, Mehrpour M, Codogno P. Autophagy regulation and its role in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23:361–79. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.06.007. PubMed DOI
Vafa O, Wade M, Kern S, Beeche M, Pandita TK, Hampton GM, et al. c-Myc can induce DNA damage, increase reactive oxygen species, and mitigate p53 function: a mechanism for oncogene-induced genetic instability. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1031–44. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00520-8. PubMed DOI
Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;434:864–70. doi: 10.1038/nature03482. PubMed DOI
Bartkova J, Rezaei N, Liontos M, Karakaidos P, Kletsas D, Issaeva N, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature. 2006;444:633–7. doi: 10.1038/nature05268. PubMed DOI
Burrell RA, McClelland SE, Endesfelder D, Groth P, Weller MC, Shaikh N, et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature. 2013;494:492–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11935. PubMed DOI PMC
Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science. 2008;319:1352–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1140735. PubMed DOI
Maya-Mendoza A, Ostrakova J, Kosar M, Hall A, Duskova P, Mistrik M, et al. Myc and Ras oncogenes engage different energy metabolism programs and evoke distinct patterns of oxidative and DNA replication stress. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:601–16. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Elgendy M, Sheridan C, Brumatti G, Martin SJ. Oncogenic Ras-induced expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 promotes autophagic cell death and limits clonogenic survival. Mol Cell. 2011;42:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.009. PubMed DOI
Young AR, Narita M, Ferreira M, Kirschner K, Sadaie M, Darot JF, et al. Autophagy mediates the mitotic senescence transition. Genes Dev. 2009;23:798–803. doi: 10.1101/gad.519709. PubMed DOI PMC
Guo JY, Chen HY, Mathew R, Fan J, Strohecker AM, Karsli-Uzunbas G, et al. Activated Ras requires autophagy to maintain oxidative metabolism and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2011;25:460–70. doi: 10.1101/gad.2016311. PubMed DOI PMC
Prior IA, Lewis PD, Mattos C. A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2457–67. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2612. PubMed DOI PMC
Schlafli AM, Berezowska S, Adams O, Langer R, Tschan MP. Reliable LC3 and p62 autophagy marker detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded human tissue by immunohistochemistry. Eur J Histochem. 2015;59:2481. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2015.2481. PubMed DOI PMC
Schlafli AM, Adams O, Galvan JA, Gugger M, Savic S, Bubendorf L, et al. Prognostic value of the autophagy markers LC3 and p62/SQSTM1 in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:39544–55. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9647. PubMed DOI PMC
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell. 2010;140:313–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028. PubMed DOI PMC
Kosar M, Bartkova J, Hubackova S, Hodny Z, Lukas J, Bartek J. Senescence-associated heterochromatin foci are dispensable for cellular senescence, occur in a cell type- and insult-dependent manner and follow expression ofp16(ink4a) Cell Cycle. 2011;10:457–68. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.3.14707. PubMed DOI
Jones RM, Mortusewicz O, Afzal I, Lorvellec M, Garcia P, Helleday T, et al. Increased replication initiation and conflicts with transcription underlie Cyclin E-induced replication stress. Oncogene. 2013;32:3744–53. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.387. PubMed DOI
Rohban S, Campaner S. Myc induced replicative stress response: How to cope with it and exploit it. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849:517–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.04.008. PubMed DOI
Narita M, Narita M. Autophagy detection during oncogene-induced senescence using fluorescence microscopy. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1534:89–98. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6670-7_8. PubMed DOI
Vesela E, Chroma K, Turi Z, Mistrik M. Common chemical inductors of replication stress: focus on cell-based studies. Biomolecules. 2017;7:19. doi: 10.3390/biom7010019. PubMed DOI PMC
Choy BK, McClarty GA, Chan AK, Thelander L, Wright JA. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance involving ribonucleotide reductase: hydroxyurea resistance in a series of clonally related mouse cell lines selected in the presence of increasing drug concentrations. Cancer Res. 1988;48:2029–35. PubMed
Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell. 2010;37:492–502. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.021. PubMed DOI PMC
Maya-Mendoza A, Olivares-Chauvet P, Kohlmeier F, Jackson DA. Visualising chromosomal replication sites and replicons in mammalian cells. Methods. 2012;57:140–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.05.006. PubMed DOI
Koundrioukoff S, Carignon S, Techer H, Letessier A, Brison O, Debatisse M. Stepwise activation of the ATR signaling pathway upon increasing replication stress impacts fragile site integrity. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003643. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilhelm T, Magdalou I, Barascu A, Techer H, Debatisse M, Lopez BS. Spontaneous slow replication fork progression elicits mitosis alterations in homologous recombination-deficient mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:763–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311520111. PubMed DOI PMC
Maya-Mendoza A, Moudry P, Merchut-Maya JM, Lee M, Strauss R, Bartek J. High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability. Nature. 2018;559:279–84. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0261-5. PubMed DOI
Mitra K, Wunder C, Roysam B, Lin G, Lippincott-Schwartz J. A hyperfused mitochondrial state achieved at G1-S regulates cyclin E buildup and entry into S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:11960–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904875106. PubMed DOI PMC
Shimizu S, Honda S, Arakawa S, Yamaguchi H. Alternative macroautophagy and mitophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;50:64–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.02.016. PubMed DOI
Guo JY, Teng X, Laddha SV, Ma S, Van Nostrand SC, Yang Y, et al. Autophagy provides metabolic substrates to maintain energy charge and nucleotide pools in Ras-driven lung cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2016;30:1704–17. doi: 10.1101/gad.283416.116. PubMed DOI PMC
Vessoni AT, Filippi-Chiela EC, Menck CF, Lenz G. Autophagy and genomic integrity. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1444–54. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.103. PubMed DOI PMC
Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:528–42. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53. PubMed DOI PMC
Macheret M, Halazonetis TD. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10:425–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040424. PubMed DOI
Aird KM, Zhang R. Metabolic alterations accompanying oncogene-induced senescence. Mol Cell Oncol. 2014;1:e963481. doi: 10.4161/23723548.2014.963481. PubMed DOI PMC
Sasaki M, Nitta T, Sato Y, Nakanuma Y. Autophagy may occur at an early stage of cholangiocarcinogenesis via biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.09.016. PubMed DOI
Feng Y, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy regulates DNA repair through SQSTM1/p62. Autophagy. 2017;13:995–6. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1317427. PubMed DOI PMC
Eapen VV, Waterman DP, Bernard A, Schiffmann N, Sayas E, Kamber R, et al. A pathway of targeted autophagy is induced by DNA damage in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E1158–67. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614364114. PubMed DOI PMC
Eliopoulos AG, Havaki S, Gorgoulis VG. DNA damage response and autophagy: a meaningful partnership. Front Genet. 2016;7:204. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00204. PubMed DOI PMC
Graziano S, Gonzalo S. Mechanisms of oncogene-induced genomic instability. Biophys Chem. 2017;225:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2016.11.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Gaillard H, Garcia-Muse T, Aguilera A. Replication stress and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:276–89. doi: 10.1038/nrc3916. PubMed DOI
Hills SA, Diffley JF. DNA replication and oncogene-induced replicative stress. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R435–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.012. PubMed DOI
Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Cecconi F, et al. Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. EMBO J. 2015;34:856–80. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490784. PubMed DOI PMC
Rosenfeld MR, Ye X, Supko JG, Desideri S, Grossman SA, Brem S, et al. A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Autophagy. 2014;10:1359–68. doi: 10.4161/auto.28984. PubMed DOI PMC
Wolpin BM, Rubinson DA, Wang X, Chan JA, Cleary JM, Enzinger PC, et al. Phase II and pharmacodynamic study of autophagy inhibition using hydroxychloroquine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist. 2014;19:637–8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0086. PubMed DOI PMC
Maycotte P, Aryal S, Cummings CT, Thorburn J, Morgan MJ, Thorburn A. Chloroquine sensitizes breast cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:200–12. doi: 10.4161/auto.8.2.18554. PubMed DOI PMC
Eng CH, Wang Z, Tkach D, Toral-Barza L, Ugwonali S, Liu S, et al. Macroautophagy is dispensable for growth of KRAS mutant tumors and chloroquine efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:182–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515617113. PubMed DOI PMC
Hoxhaj G, Hughes-Hallett J, Timson RC, Ilagan E, Yuan M, Asara JM, et al. The mTORC1 Signaling Network Senses Changes in Cellular Purine Nucleotide Levels. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1331–46. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.029. PubMed DOI PMC
Frankel LB, Lubas M, Lund AH. Emerging connections between RNA and autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13:3–23. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1222992. PubMed DOI PMC
Dyavaiah M, Rooney JP, Chittur SV, Lin Q, Begley TJ. Autophagy-dependent regulation of the DNA damage response protein ribonucleotide reductase 1. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:462–75. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0473. PubMed DOI
Rabinowitz JD, White E. Autophagy and metabolism. Science. 2010;330:1344–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1193497. PubMed DOI PMC
Chen W, Zhang L, Zhang K, Zhou B, Kuo ML, Hu S, et al. Reciprocal regulation of autophagy and dNTP pools in human cancer cells. Autophagy. 2014;10:1272–84. doi: 10.4161/auto.28954. PubMed DOI PMC
Tan Q, Wang M, Yu M, Zhang J, Bristow RG, Hill RP, et al. Role of autophagy as a survival mechanism for hypoxic cells in tumors. Neoplasia. 2016;18:347–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.04.003. PubMed DOI PMC
Mazure NM, Pouyssegur J. Hypoxia-induced autophagy: cell death or cell survival? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:177–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.015. PubMed DOI
O’Prey J, Sakamaki J, Baudot AD, New M, Van Acker T, Tooze SA, et al. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 to autophagy research. Methods Enzymol. 2017;588:79–108. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.076. PubMed DOI
Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, Lukas C, Larsen DH, Povlsen LK, et al. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell. 2013;155:1088–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.043. PubMed DOI
Egerod FL, Bartels A, Fristrup N, Borre M, Orntoft TF, Oleksiewicz MB, et al. High frequency of tumor cells with nuclear Egr-1 protein expression in human bladder cancer is associated with disease progression. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-385. PubMed DOI PMC
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon, France. 2004.
Burdelski C, Reiswich V, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Minner S, Koop C, et al. Cytoplasmic accumulation of sequestosome 1 (p62) is a predictor of biochemical recurrence, rapid tumor cell proliferation, and genomic instability in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:3471–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0620. PubMed DOI
Kowalik MA, Perra A, Ledda-Columbano GM, Ippolito G, Piacentini M, Columbano A, et al. Induction of autophagy promotes the growth of early preneoplastic rat liver nodules. Oncotarget. 2016;7:5788–99. PubMed PMC
Pankiv S, Lamark T, Bruun JA, Overvatn A, Bjorkoy G, Johansen T. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of p62/SQSTM1 and its role in recruitment of nuclear polyubiquitinated proteins to promyelocytic leukemia bodies. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:5941–53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.039925. PubMed DOI PMC