Manual perineal protection: The know-how and the know-why
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31793662
DOI
10.1111/aogs.13781
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Finnish, Viennese, hands-on, manual perineal protection of perineal trauma, perineum, protection, tear,
- MeSH
- babictví * metody MeSH
- klinické kompetence MeSH
- komplikace těhotenství prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lacerace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perineum zranění MeSH
- porod MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Slovinsko MeSH
- Spojené království MeSH
Manual perineal protection is an obstetric intervention to mitigate the risk of perineal trauma. There are two effective techniques (Finnish and Viennese) with minor but distinctive differences in between them. The main aim of this study was to explore clinicians' knowledge about the manual perineal protection technique they use. The study took place in three maternity units that support manual perineal protection policy in three European countries (Czech Republic, Slovenia and the UK). Our study demonstrated that the majority of participants are aware of the concept of manual perineal protection. However, there were significant differences between staff responses regarding their views and experience with manual perineal protection in general. Less than 6% of respondents were able to provide an accurate account of the actual maneuvers they perform when manually protecting the perineum. Although this is not necessarily synonymous with suboptimal performance, it highlights the potential need to give more attention to the theory that underpins the technical skill in manual perineal protection training programs.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Department of General Anthropology Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Croydon University Hospital London UK
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Pilsen Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Dewees WB. Relaxation and management of the perineum during parturition. JAMA. 1889;XIII(23):804-808.
Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):59.
Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1725-1734.
Ismail KMK, Paschetta E, Papoutsis D, Freeman RM. Perineal support and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a Delphi survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:165-174.
Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Prevalence and risk indicators for anal incontinence among pregnant women. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:1-8.
Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sanda B, Horne H, Spydslaug A, Staff AC. Prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(4):319-324.
Norderval S, Nsubuga D, Bjelke C, Frasunek J, Myklebust I, Vonen B. Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian county. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(10):989-994.
Sundquist J-C. Long-term outcome after obstetric injury: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(6):715-718.
Fodstad K, Staff AC, Laine K. Sexual activity and dyspareunia the first year postpartum in relation to degree of perineal trauma. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1513-1523.
McCandlish R, Bowler U, Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. BJOG. 1998;105(12):1262-1272.
Mayerhofer K, Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, et al. Traditional care of the perineum during birth. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 1,076 women. J Reprod Med. 2002;47(6):477-482.
Bulchandani S, Watts E, Sucharitha A, Yates D, Ismail K. Manual perineal support at the time of childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122(9):1157-1165.
Laine K, Rotvold W, Staff AC. Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable? Large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(1):94-100.
Hals E, Øian P, Pirhonen T, et al. A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):901-908.
Laine K, Pirhonen T, Rolland R, Pirhonen J. Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1053-1057.
Stedenfeldt M, Øian P, Gissler M, Blix E, Pirhonen J. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme. BJOG. 2014;121(1):83-91.
Zemčík R, Karbanova J, Kalis V, Lobovský L, Jansová M, Rusavy Z. Stereophotogrammetry of the perineum during vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(1):76-80.
Jansova M, Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Zemcik R, Lobovsky L, Laine K. Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):65-71.
Kalis V, Karbanova J, Bukacova Z, Bednarova B, Rokyta Z, Kralickova M. Anal dilation during labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;109(2):136-139.
Jansova M, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Hyncik L, Karbanova J, Rusavy Z. The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(11):1533-1540.
Jansova M, Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Räisänen S, Lobovsky L, Laine K. Fetal head size and effect of manual perineal protection. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0189842.
Kalis V, Jansova M, Rusavy Z. Perineal mapping. In: Ismail KMK, ed. Perineal Trauma at Childbirth. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016:41-70.
Naidu M, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(3):381-389.
Leenskjold S, Høj L, Pirhonen J. Manual protection of the perineum reduces the risk of obstetric anal sphincter ruptures. Dan Med J. 2015;62. pii: A5075.
Ali HY, Vikanes Å, Anti M, et al. Evaluation of an animated instructional video as a training tool for manual perineum support during vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;137(2):213-219.
Ali-Masri H, Hassan S, Fosse E, et al. Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):258.
Is the Finnish grip tight enough? A manometric study of two manual perineal protection techniques
Metrics of perineal support (MOPS) study
