Outcomes with Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplantation from Standard- and Extended-Criteria Donors - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Prospective OSAKA Study

. 2020 May 29 ; 25 () : e920041. [epub] 20200529

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32467559

BACKGROUND This post hoc analysis of data from the prospective OSAKA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prolonged- and immediate-release tacrolimus in patients who received kidneys from extended-criteria (ECD) and standard-criteria (SCD) donors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the ECD and SCD groups, patients were randomized to one of 4 tacrolimus-based regimens (initial dose): Arm 1, immediate-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day); Arm 2, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day); Arm 3, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.3 mg/kg/day); Arm 4, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and bolus corticosteroids; Arms 1-3 also received tapered corticosteroids. ECDs met the definition: living/deceased donors aged ≥60 years, or 50-60 years with ≥1 other risk factor, and donation after circulatory death. Primary composite endpoint: graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection or renal dysfunction by Day 168. Outcomes were compared across treatment arms with the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 1198 patients were included in the analysis (ECD: n=620 [51.8%], SCD: n=578 [48.2%]). Patients with kidneys from ECDs were older versus SCDs (mean age, 55.7 vs. 44.5 years, p<0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with kidneys from ECDs versus SCDs met the primary composite endpoint (56.8% vs. 32.4%, p<0.0001). However, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes or the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events were seen between treatment arms within each donor group. CONCLUSIONS Worse outcomes were experienced in patients who received kidneys from ECDs versus SCDs. Prolonged-release tacrolimus provided similar graft survival to the immediate-release formulation, with a manageable tolerability profile.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nankivell BJ, Kuypers DRJ. Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss. Lancet. 2011;378:1428–37. PubMed

Gondos A, Döhler B, Brenner H, Opelz G. Kidney graft survival in Europe and the United States: Strikingly different long-term outcomes. Transplantation. 2013;95:267–74. PubMed

Lamb KE, Lodhi S, Meier-Kriesche H-U. Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: A critical reappraisal. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:450–62. PubMed

Collins MG, Chang SH, Russ GR, McDonald SP. Outcomes of transplantation using kidneys from donors meeting expanded criteria in Australia and New Zealand, 1991 to 2005. Transplantation. 2009;87:1201–9. PubMed

Rao PS, Ojo A. The alphabet soup of kidney transplantation: SCD, DCD, ECD – Fundamentals for the practicing nephrologist. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1827–31. PubMed

Aubert O, Kamar N, Vernerey D, et al. Long term outcomes of transplantation using kidneys from expanded criteria donors: Prospective, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015;351:h3557. PubMed PMC

Tedesco Silva H, Yang HHC, Meier-Kriesche H-U, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III clinical trial comparing tacrolimus extended-release/MMF, tacrolimus/MMF, and cyclosporine/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2014;97:636–41. PubMed PMC

Ekberg H, Bernasconi C, Tedesco-Silva H, et al. Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in the Symphony study: Observational results 3 years after transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1876–85. PubMed

Albano L, Banas B, Klempnauer JL, et al. OSAKA trial: A randomized, controlled trial comparing tacrolimus QD and BD in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;96:897–903. PubMed PMC

Arns W, Citterio F, Campistol JM. ‘Old-for-old’ – New strategies for renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:336–41. PubMed

Isakova T, Xie H, Messinger S, et al. Inhibitors of mTOR and risks of allograft failure and mortality in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:100–10. PubMed PMC

Ferrer F, Mota A, Alves R, et al. Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: The experience of one Portuguese center. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:791–93. PubMed

Lai Q, Pretagostini R, Poli L, et al. Delayed graft function decreases early and intermediate graft outcomes after expanded criteria donor kidney transplants. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:1145–48. PubMed

Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(Suppl 4):114–25. PubMed

Frutos MA, Sola E, Mansilla JJ, et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation: Quality control and results. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:2371–73. PubMed

La Manna G, Comai G, Cappuccilli ML, et al. Prediction of three-year outcome of renal transplantation from optimal donors versus expanded criteria donors. Am J Nephrol. 2013;37:158–66. PubMed

Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2562–75. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...