Considering unseen arrivals in predictions of establishment risk based on border biosecurity interceptions
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Grant support
DBI-1639145
National Science Foundation - International
USDA Forest Service - International
C09X1501
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge) - International
Te Pūnaha Matatini - International
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803
OP RDE - International
Swedish Agricultural University - International
PubMed
32524655
DOI
10.1002/eap.2194
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Aphididae, Cerambycidae, biosecurity, interception, species establishment, stochastic process,
- MeSH
- Coleoptera * MeSH
- Insecta MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Stochastic Processes MeSH
- Introduced Species * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
- Geographicals
- New Zealand MeSH
Assessing species establishment risk is an important task used for informing biosecurity activities aimed at preventing biological invasions. Propagule pressure is a major contributor to the probability of invading species establishment; however, direct assessment of numbers of individuals arriving is virtually never possible. Inspections conducted at borders by biosecurity officials record counts of species (or higher-level taxa) intercepted during inspections, which can be used as proxies for arrival rates. Such data may therefore be useful for predicting species establishments, though some species may establish despite never being intercepted. We present a stochastic process-based model of the arrival-interception-establishment process to predict species establishment risk from interception count data. The model can be used to estimate the probability of establishment, both for species that were intercepted and species that had no interceptions during a given observation period. We fit the stochastic model to data on two insect families, Cerambycidae and Aphididae, that were intercepted and/or established in the United States or New Zealand. We also explore the effects of variation in model parameters and the inclusion of an Allee effect in the establishment probability. Although interception data sets contain much noise due to variation in inspection policy, interception effort and among-species differences in detectability, our study shows that it is possible to use such data for predicting establishments and distinguishing differences in establishment risk profile between taxonomic groups. Our model provides a method for predicting the number of species that have breached border biosecurity, including both species detected during inspections but also "unseen arrivals" that have never been intercepted, but have not yet established a viable population. These estimates could inform prioritization of different taxonomic groups, pathways or identification effort in biosecurity programs.
School of Forestry University of Canterbury Private Bag 4800 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand
Scion Christchurch 8440 P O Box 29237 New Zealand
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Zürcherstrasse 111 8903 Birmensdorf Switzerland
Te Pūnaha Matatini The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019 Auckland 1142 New Zealand
USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown West Virginia 26505 USA
See more in PubMed
Andersen, M. C., H. Adams, B. Hope, and M. Powell. 2004. Risk assessment for invasive species. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 24:787-793.
Australian Department of Agriculture. 2014. Final report for the non-regulated analysis of existing policy for table grapes from Japan. CC BY 3.0. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.
Bacon, S. J., A. Aebi, P. Calanca, and S. Bacher. 2014. Quarantine arthropod invasions in Europe: the role of climate, hosts and propagule pressure. Diversity and Distributions 20:84-94.
Bertelsmeier, C., S. Ollier, A. M. Liebhold, E. G. Brockerhoff, D. Ward, and L. Keller. 2018. Recurrent bridgehead effects accelerate global alien ant spread. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115:5486-5491.
Brockerhoff, E. G., J. Bain, M. Kimberley, and M. Knížek. 2006. Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:289-298.
Brockerhoff, E. G., M. Kimberley, A. M. Liebhold, R. A. Haack, and J. F. Cavey. 2014. Predicting how altering propagule pressure changes establishment rates of biological invaders across species pools. Ecology 95:594-601.
Caley, P., R. Ingram, and P. De Barro. 2015. Entry of exotic insects into Australia: Does border interception count match incursion risk? Biological invasions 17:1087-1094.
Close, R. C., N. T. Moar, A. I. Tomlinson, and A. D. Lowe. 1978. Aerial dispersal of biological material from Australia to New Zealand. International Journal of Biometeorology 22:1-19.
Colunga-Garcia, M., R. Haack, R. Magarey, and D. Borchert. 2013. Understanding trade pathways to target biosecurity surveillance. NeoBiota 18:103.
Crooks, J. A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316-329.
Duncan, R. P., T. M. Blackburn, S. Rossinelli, and S. Bacher. 2014. Quantifying invasion risk: the relationship between establishment probability and founding population size. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:1255-1263.
Epanchin-Niell, R. S. 2017. Economics of invasive species policy and management. Biological Invasions 19:3333-3354.
Eschen, R., A. Roques, and A. Santini. 2015. Taxonomic dissimilarity in patterns of interception and establishment of alien arthropods, nematodes and pathogens affecting woody plants in Europe. Diversity and Distributions 21:36-45.
Evans, H. F.. 2010. Pest risk analysis-organisms or pathways. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 40:S45-S56.
Fournier, A., C. Penone, M. G. Pennino, and F. Courchamp. 2019. Predicting future invaders and future invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 116:7905-7910.
Haack, R. A. 2006. Exotic bark-and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:269-288.
Hayes, K. R. 2003. Biosecurity and the role of risk assessment. Pages 382-414 in G. M. Ruiz and J. T. Carlton, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Hudson, D. J.. 1971. Interval estimation from the likelihood function. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 33:256-262.
Kenis, M., W. Rabitsch, M. A. Auger-Rozenberg, and A. Roques. 2007. How can alien species inventories and interception data help us prevent insect invasions? Bulletin of Entomological Research 97:489-502.
Leung, B., et al. 2012. TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecology Letters 15:1475-1493.
Leung, B., J. M. Drake, and D. M. Lodge. 2004. Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of Allee effects. Ecology 85:1651-1660.
Leung, B., M. R. Springborn, J. A. Turner, and E. G. Brockerhoff. 2014. Pathway-level risk analysis: the net present value of an invasive species policy in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:273-279.
Liebhold, A. M., E. G. Brockerhoff, L. J. Garrett, J. L. Parke, and K. O. Britton. 2012. Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:135-143.
Liebhold, A. M., E. G. Brockerhoff, and M. Kimberley. 2017. Depletion of heterogeneous source species pools predicts future invasion rates. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1968-1977.
Liebhold, A. M., and P. C. Tobin. 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annual Review of Entomology 53:387-408.
Lockwood, J. L., P. Cassey, and T. Blackburn. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20:223-228.
Magarey, R. D., M. Colunga-Garcia, and D. A. Fieselmann. 2009. Plant biosecurity in the United States: roles, responsibilities, and information needs. BioScience 59:875-884.
Magurran, A. E. 2013. Measuring biological diversity. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2003. Sea Container Review. MAF Discussion Paper No. 35. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand.
Newman, M. E. J. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics 46:323-351.
Phillips, C. B., J. M. Kean, C. J. Vink, and J. A. Berry. 2018. Utility of the CLIMEX ‘match climates regional’ algorithm for pest risk analysis: an evaluation with non-native ants in New Zealand. Biological Invasions 20:777-791.
Roques, A., and M. A. Auger-Rozenberg. 2006. Tentative analysis of the interceptions of non-indigenous organisms in Europe during 1995-2004 1. EPPO Bulletin 36:490-496.
Saccaggi, D. L., M. Karsten, M. P. Robertson, S. Kumschick, M. J. Somers, J. R. U. Wilson, and J. S. Terblanche. 2016. Methods and approaches for the management of arthropod border incursions. Biological Invasions 18:1057-1075.
Seebens, H., et al. 2018. Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115:E2264-E2273.
Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:81-102.
Simberloff, D., et al. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28:58-66.
Springborn, M. R., A. R. Lindsay, and R. S. Epanchin-Niell. 2016. Harnessing enforcement leverage at the border to minimize biological risk from international live species trade. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 132:98-112.
Surkov, I. V., A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink, O. Van Kooten, and W. Van Der Werf. 2008. A model of optimal import phytosanitary inspection under capacity constraint. Agricultural Economics 38:363-373.
Taylor, C. M., and A. Hastings. 2005. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecology Letters 8:895-908.
Teulon, D. A. J., and M. A. W. Stufkens. 2002. Biosecurity and aphids in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection 55:12-17.
Tingley, R., P. García-Díaz, C. R. R. Arantes, and P. Cassey. 2018. Integrating transport pressure data and species distribution models to estimate invasion risk for alien stowaways. Ecography 41:635-646.
Whyte, C.. 2006. Science and biosecurity-monitoring the effectiveness of biosecurity interventions at New Zealand’s borders. Royal Society of New Zealand, Miscellaneous Series 67:27-36.
Work, T. T., D. G. McCullough, J. F. Cavey, and R. Komsa. 2005. Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade. Biological Invasions 7:323.
Worner, S., et al. 2013. Prioritizing the risk of plant pests by clustering methods; self-organising maps, k-means and hierarchical clustering. NeoBiota 18:83.