Replicating and extending the effects of auditory religious cues on dishonest behavior
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32790699
PubMed Central
PMC7425871
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0237007
PII: PONE-D-20-04631
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hudba * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mravy * MeSH
- náboženství * MeSH
- podněty MeSH
- rozhodování etika MeSH
- srovnání kultur MeSH
- videohry etika MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Japonsko MeSH
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
Although scientists agree that replications are critical to the debate on the validity of religious priming research, religious priming replications are scarce. This paper attempts to replicate and extend previously observed effects of religious priming on ethical behavior. We test the effect of religious instrumental music on individuals' ethical behavior with university participants (N = 408) in the Czech Republic, Japan, and the US. Participants were randomly assigned to listen to one of three musical tracks (religious, secular, or white noise) or to no music (control) for the duration of a decision-making game. Participants were asked to indicate which side of a vertically-bisected computer screen contained more dots and, in every trial, indicating that the right side of the screen had more dots earned participants the most money (irrespective of the number of dots). Therefore, participants were able to report dishonestly to earn more money. In agreement with previous research, we did not observe any main effects of condition. However, we were unable to replicate a moderating effect of self-reported religiosity on the effects of religious music on ethical behavior. Nevertheless, further analyses revealed moderating effects for ritual participation and declared religious affiliation congruent with the musical prime. That is, participants affiliated with a religious organization and taking part in rituals cheated significantly less than their peers when listening to religious music. We also observed significant differences in cheating behavior across samples. On average, US participants cheated the most and Czech participants cheated the least. We conclude that normative conduct is, in part, learned through active membership in religious communities and our findings provide further support for religious music as a subtle, moral cue.
Department of Behavioral Science Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan
Department of Management Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom
LEVYNA Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Questrom School of Business Boston University Boston MA United States of America
Social Sciences Research Institute Duke University Durham NC United States of America
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Shariff AF, Willard AK, Andersen T, Norenzayan A. Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2016;20: 27–48. 10.1177/1088868314568811 PubMed DOI
van Elk M, Matzke D, Gronau QF, Guan M, Vandekerckhove J, Wagenmakers E-J. Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Front Psychol. 2015;6: 1–7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00001 PubMed DOI PMC
Willard AK, Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. Religious priming as a research tool for studying religion: Evidentiary value, current issues, and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;12: 71–75. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.003 DOI
Lang M, Mitkidis P, Kundt R, Nichols A, Krajčíková L, Xygalatas D, et al. Music As a Sacred Cue? Effects of Religious Music on Moral Behavior. Front Psychol. 2016;7: 814 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00814 PubMed DOI PMC
Xygalatas D. Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius. Religion Brain Behav. 2013;3: 91–102. 10.1080/2153599X.2012.724547 DOI
Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. God Is Watching You. Psychol Sci. 2007;18: 803–809. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x PubMed DOI
Ahmed AM, Salas O. In the back of your mind: Subliminal influences of religious concepts on prosocial behavior. Work Pap Econ …. 2008;2473 Available: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/dspace/handle/2077/18838%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/E72C13D7-0281-4C15-B7FB-49AC52B81C4E
Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D. The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance. J Mark Res. 2008;45: 633–644. 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 DOI
Bering JM, McLeod K, Shackelford TK. Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Hum Nat. 2005;16: 360–381. 10.1007/s12110-005-1015-2 PubMed DOI
Lang M, Shaw DJ, Reddish P, Wallot S, Mitkidis P, Xygalatas D. Lost in the Rhythm: Effects of Rhythm on Subsequent Interpersonal Coordination. Cogn Sci. 2016;40: 1797–1815. 10.1111/cogs.12302 PubMed DOI
Xygalatas D, Klocová EK, Cigán J, Kundt R, Maňo P, Kotherová S, et al. Location, Location, Location: Effects of Cross-Religious Primes on Prosocial Behavior. Int J Psychol Relig. 2016;26: 304–319. 10.1080/10508619.2015.1097287 DOI
Mitkidis P, Ayal S, Shalvi S, Heimann K, Levy G, Kyselo M, et al. The effects of extreme rituals on moral behavior: The performers-observers gap hypothesis. J Econ Psychol. 2017;59: 1–7. 10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.007 DOI
Krátký J, McGraw JJ, Xygalatas D, Mitkidis P, Reddish P. It depends who is watching you: 3-D agent cues increase fairness. PLoS One. 2016;11: 1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148845 PubMed DOI PMC
Bargh JA, Schwader KL, Hailey SE, Dyer RL, Boothby EJ. Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16: 593–605. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002 PubMed DOI
Newell BR, Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behav Brain Sci. 2014;37: 1–19. 10.1017/S0140525X12003214 PubMed DOI
Aveyard ME. A Call to Honesty: Extending Religious Priming of Moral Behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PLoS One. 2014;9: e99447 Available: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099447 PubMed DOI PMC
Carter EC, Schönbrodt FD, Gervais WM, Hilgard J. Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2019;2: 115–144. 10.1177/2515245919847196 DOI
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-Positive Psychology. Psychol Sci. 2011;22: 1359–1366. 10.1177/0956797611417632 PubMed DOI
Stanley TD. Limitations of PET-PEESE and Other Meta-Analysis Methods. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;8: 581–591. 10.1177/1948550617693062 DOI
Gomes CM, McCullough ME. The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144: e94–e104. 10.1037/xge0000027 PubMed DOI
Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Fisher GW. Religious Identity and Economic Behavior. Natl Bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser. 2010;No. 15925. 10.3386/w15925 PubMed DOI PMC
Billingsley J, Gomes CM, Mccullough ME, Billingsley J. Implicit and explicit influences of religious cognition on Dictator Game transfers. R Soc open Sci. 2018;5: 170238 10.1098/rsos.170238 PubMed DOI PMC
Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. A question of reliability or of boundary conditions? Comment on Gomes and McCullough (2015). J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144: e105–e106. 10.1037/xge0000111 PubMed DOI
White CJM, Kelly JM, Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. Supernatural norm enforcement: Thinking about karma and God reduces selfishness among believers. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2019;84: 103797 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.008 DOI
Henrich J, Ensminger J, McElreath R, Barr A, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, et al. Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment. Science (80-). 2010;327: 1480–1484. 10.1126/science.1182238 PubMed DOI
Purzycki BG, Apicella C, Atkinson QD, Cohen E, McNamara RA, Willard AK, et al. Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature. 2016;530: 327–330. 10.1038/nature16980 PubMed DOI
Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33: 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X PubMed DOI
Sears DO. College Sophomores in the Laboratory—Influences of a Narrow Database on Social-Psychology View of Human-Nature. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51: 515–530. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.515 DOI
Lang M, Purzycki BG, Apicella CL, Atkinson QD, Bolyanatz A, Cohen E, et al. Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0202 PubMed DOI PMC
Gómez OS, Juristo N, Vegas S. Replications Types in Experimental Disciplines. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2010. 10.1145/1852786.1852790 DOI
Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication? PLOS Biol. 2020;18: e3000691 Available: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691 PubMed DOI PMC
Wright 1957- R. The evolution of God. New York: New York: Little, Brown, 2009.; 2009. Available: https://find.library.duke.edu/catalog/DUKE004182924
Johnson DDP. God’s punishment and public goods: A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Hum Nat. 2005;16: 410–446. 10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0 PubMed DOI
Johnson D. God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. New York: New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Gino F, Norton MI, Ariely D. The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychol Sci. 2010;21: 712–720. 10.1177/0956797610366545 PubMed DOI
Kavanagh C. Religion without belief. Aeon Magazine. Sep 2016. Available: https://aeon.co/essays/can-religion-be-based-on-ritual-practice-without-belief
Reader I, Tanabe GJ. Practically Religious: Worldly Benefits and the Common Religion of Japan. University of Hawaii Press; 1998.
Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook 2018–2019. In: The World Factbook [Internet]. 2018. Available: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/fields/335rank.html
Kavanagh C, Jong J. Is Japan Religious? Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture. J Study Relig Nat Cult. 14 10.31234/osf.io/qyt95 DOI
Theodorou AE. Americans are in the middle of the pack globally when it comes to importance of religion. 2015 [cited 17 Jul 2018]. Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/23/americans-are-in-the-middle-of-the-pack-globally-when-it-comes-to-importance-of-religion/
Pew Research Center. Religiosity and the Role of Religion. In: End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations [Internet]. 2009 [cited 18 Jul 2018] p. 12. Available: https://www.pewglobal.org/2009/11/02/chapter-11-religiosity-and-the-role-of-religion/
Lipka M, Gecewiz C. More Americans now say their spiritual, but not religious. In: Pew Research Center [Internet]. 2017. [cited 18 Jul 2018]. Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/06/more-americans-now-say-theyre-spiritual-but-not-religious/
Pew Research Center. The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050. 2015.
Smith GA. A growing share of Americans say it’s not necessary to believe in God to be moral. In: Pew Research Center [Internet]. 2017. [cited 18 Jul 2018]. Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/16/a-growing-share-of-americans-say-its-not-necessary-to-believe-in-god-to-be-moral/
Inglehart R, Haerpfer C, Moreno A, Welzel C, Kizilova K, Diez-Medrano J, et al. World Values Survey: Round Six. 2014. Available: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
Covell SG. Japanese Temple Buddhism: Worldliness in a Religion of Renunciation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 2005.
Kitagawa JM. On Understanding Japanese Religion. Princeton University Press; 1987.
Nelson JK. Freedom of expression: The very modern practice of visiting a Shinto shrine. Japanese J Relig Stud. 1996;23: 117–153. 10.18874/jjrs.23.1–2.1996.117–153 DOI
Nelson JK. Enduring identities: The guise of Shinto in contemporary Japan. University of Hawaii Press; 2000.
Miyatake S, Higuchi M. Does religious priming increase the prosocial behaviour of a Japanese sample in an anonymous economic game? Asian J Soc Psychol. 2017;20: 54–59. 10.1111/ajsp.12164 DOI
Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol Lett. 2006;2: 412–414. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509 PubMed DOI PMC
Sparks A, Barclay P. Eye Images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;34: 317–322. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001 DOI
Hill PC, Hood RW. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Ala.: Birmingham, Ala.: Religious Education Press; 1999.
Norenzayan A. Theodiversity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67: 465–488. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426 PubMed DOI
Cohen AB, Hill PC. Religion as Culture: Religious Individualism and Collectivism Among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. J Pers. 2007;75: 709–742. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00454.x PubMed DOI
Cohen AB, Siegel JI, Rozin P. Faith versus practice: different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2003;33: 287–295. 10.1002/ejsp.148 DOI
Bell CM. Ritual perspectives and dimensions. New York: New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
Sosis R, Ruffle BJ. Religious Ritual and Cooperation: Testing for a Relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim. Curr Anthropol. 2003;44: 713–722. 10.1086/379260 DOI
Xygalatas D, Kotherová S, Maňo P, Kundt R, Cigán J, Klocová EK, et al. Big Gods in small places: the Random Allocation Game in Mauritius. Relig Brain Behav. 2018;8: 243–261. 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267033 DOI
Xygalatas D, Mitkidis P, Fischer R, Reddish P, Skewes J, Geertz AW, et al. Extreme Rituals Promote Prosociality. Psychol Sci. 2013;24: 1602–1605. 10.1177/0956797612472910 PubMed DOI
Alcorta CS, Sosis R. Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols: The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex. Hum Nat. 2005;16: 323–359. 10.1007/s12110-005-1014-3 PubMed DOI
Cross I, Morley I. The evolution of music: Theories, definitions and the nature of the evidence. pp. 61–82. Available: http://www.mus.cam.ac.uk/~ic108/PDF/CM_CM08.pdf
Lang M, Bahna V, Shaver JH, Reddish P, Xygalatas D. Sync to link: Endorphin-mediated synchrony effects on cooperation. Biol Psychol. 2017;127: 191–197. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.06.001 PubMed DOI
Dale R, Fusaroli R, Hakonsson DD, Healey PGT, Monster D, McGraw JJ, et al. Beyond synchrony: Complementarity and asynchrony in joint action. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 2013.
Hochman G, Glöckner A, Fiedler S, Ayal S. “I can see it in your eyes”: Biased Processing and Increased Arousal in Dishonest Responses. J Behav Decis Mak. 2016;29: 322–335. 10.1002/bdm.1932 DOI
Nelson SG. Court and religious music (1): history of gagaku and shōmyō. In: Tokita AM, Hughes DW, editors. The Ashgate Research Companion to Japanese Music. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008. pp. 61–74. 10.4324/9781315172354.ch2 DOI
Nelson SG. Court and religious music (2): music of gagaku and shōmyō. In: Tokita AM, Hughes DW, editors. The Ashgate Research Companion to Japanese Music. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008. pp. 75–102. 10.4324/9781315172354.ch3 DOI
Johnson H. The Koto: A Traditional Instrument in Contemporary Japan. Amsterdam: Hotei Publishing; 2004.
Smithson M, Verkuilen J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods. 2006;11: 54–71. 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54 PubMed DOI
Spiro ME. Buddhism and society: A great tradition and its Burmese vicissitudes. University of California Press; 1982.
Shaver JH, Lang M, Krátký J, Klocová EK, Kundt R, Xygalatas D. The Boundaries of Trust: Cross-Religious and Cross-Ethnic Field Experiments in Mauritius. Evol Psychol. 2018. 10.1177/1474704918817644 PubMed DOI PMC
McCullough ME, Swartwout P, Shaver JH, Carter EC, Sosis R. Christian religious badges instill trust in Christian and non-Christian perceivers. Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2016;8: 149–163. 10.1037/rel0000045 DOI
Heelas P, Woodhead L, Seel B, Szerszynski B, Tusting K. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Oxford, UK: Wiley; 2005.
Bornstein RF. Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968–1987. Psychol Bull. 1989;106: 265–289. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 DOI
Witvliet CVO, Vrana SR. Play it again Sam: Repeated exposure to emotionally evocative music polarises liking and smiling responses, and influences other affective reports, facial EMG, and heart rate. Cogn Emot. 2007;21: 3–25. 10.1080/02699930601000672 DOI
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Effects of message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1989;10: 3–12. 10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2 DOI
Xygalatas D, Lang M. Prosociality and Religion. Ment Relig Brain, Cogn Cult. 2017; 119–133.
Pew Research Center. Worldwide, Many See Belief in God as Esssential to Morality. 2014. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/05/Pew-Research-Center-Global-Attitudes-Project-Belief-in-God-Report-REVISED-MAY-27-2014.pdf
Whitehouse H. The cognitive foundations of religiosity. McCauley R N (ed) Mind and Religion: psychological and cognitive foundations of religiosity Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 2005. pp. 207–232.
Sosis R, Alcorta C. Signaling, Solidarity, and the Sacred: The Evolution of Religious Behavior. Evol Anthropol. 2003;12: 264–274. 10.1002/evan.10120 DOI
Bulbulia J, Sosis R. Signalling theory and the evolution of religious cooperation. Religion. 2011;41: 363–388. 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604508 DOI
Lang M. The evolutionary paths to collective rituals: An interdisciplinary perspective on the origins and functions of the basic social act. Arch Psychol Relig. 2019;41: 224–252. 10.1177/0084672419894682 DOI
Sosis R. Why aren’t we all hutterites? Costly Signaling Theory and Religious Behavior. Hum Nat. 2003;14: 91–127. 10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6 PubMed DOI
Shaver JH, DiVietro S, Lang M, Sosis R. Costs do not Explain Variance in Trust among Secular Groups. J Cogn Cult. 2018;18: 180–204. 10.1163/15685373-12340025 DOI
Clark HH. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1973;12: 335–359. 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3 DOI
Judd CM, Westfall J, Kenny DA. Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012;103: 54–69. 10.1037/a0028347 PubMed DOI
Cohen AB, Mazza GL, Johnson KA, Enders CK, Warner CM, Pasek MH, et al. Theorizing and Measuring Religiosity Across Cultures. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2017;43: 1724–1736. 10.1177/0146167217727732 PubMed DOI
Banks WP. Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychol Bull. 1970;74: 81–99. 10.1037/h0029531 DOI
Koriat A, Goldsmith M. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychol Rev. 1996;103: 490–517. 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.490 PubMed DOI
Yonelinas AP. The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research. J Mem Lang. 2002;46: 441–517. 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 DOI
Advertising cooperative phenotype through costly signals facilitates collective action