Apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

. 2020 Nov ; 25 (11) : 1892-1900. [epub] 20200914

Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32924096
Odkazy

PubMed 32924096
PubMed Central PMC7572325
DOI 10.1007/s10147-020-01777-9
PII: 10.1007/s10147-020-01777-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) has undergone a paradigm shift with next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors. However, direct comparative data are not available to inform treatment decisions and/or guideline recommendations. Therefore, we performed network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments. Multiple databases were searched for articles published before June 2020. Studies that compared overall and/or metastasis-free and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (OS/MFS/PSA-PFS) and/or adverse events (AEs) in nmCRPC patients were considered eligible. Three studies (n = 4117) met our eligibility criteria. Formal network meta-analyses were conducted. For MFS, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide were significantly more effective than placebo, and apalutamide emerged as the best option (P score: 0.8809). Apalutamide [hazard ratio (HR): 0.85, 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.77-0.94] and enzalutamide (HR: 0.86, 95% CrI: 0.78-0.95) were both significantly more effective than darolutamide. For PSA-PFS, all three agents were statistically superior to placebo, and apalutamide emerged as the likely preferred option (P score: 1.000). Apalutamide (HR: 0.71, 95% CrI: 0.69-0.74) and enzalutamide (HR: 0.76, 95% CrI: 0.74-0.79) were both significantly more effective than darolutamide. For AEs (including all AEs, grade 3 or grade 4 AEs, grade 5 AEs, and discontinuation rates), darolutamide was the likely best option. Apalutamide and enzalutamide appear to be more efficacious agents for therapy of nmCRPC, while darolutamide appears to have the most favorable tolerability profile. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment strategies and inform future direct comparative trials.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. PubMed DOI

Kluth LA, Shariat SF, Kratzik C, et al. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and prostate cancer: implications for androgen deprivation therapy. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):669–676. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1157-5. PubMed DOI

Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502–1512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720. PubMed DOI

Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. New Engl J med. 2014;371(5):424–433. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095. PubMed DOI PMC

Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207506. PubMed DOI

Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. New Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):138–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. PubMed DOI PMC

de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):1995–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. PubMed DOI PMC

Oudard S. TROPIC: Phase III trial of cabazitaxel for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Future Oncol. 2011;7(4):497–506. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.23. PubMed DOI

Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411–422. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294. PubMed DOI

Hoskin P, Sartor O, O’Sullivan JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of radium-223 dichloride in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, with or without previous docetaxel use: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1397–1406. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70474-7. PubMed DOI

Mateo J, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, et al. Managing nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.035. PubMed DOI

Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2465–2474. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800536. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1408–1418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715546. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2019;380(13):1235–1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671. PubMed DOI

Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2019) EAU Guidelines: Prostate Cancer 2019. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/

Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide and survival in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2197–2206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2003892. PubMed DOI

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–784. doi: 10.7326/m14-2385. PubMed DOI

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PubMed DOI PMC

van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, et al. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(4):285–299. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. PubMed DOI

Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):607–617. doi: 10.1177/0272989x12458724. PubMed DOI PMC

Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-54. PubMed DOI PMC

Rucker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. PubMed DOI

Small EJ, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30(11):1813–1820. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz397. PubMed DOI PMC

Hird AE, Magee DE, Bhindi B, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of novel androgen receptor inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.005. PubMed DOI

Kumar J, Jazayeri SB, Gautam S, et al. Comparative efficacy of apalutamide darolutamide and enzalutamide for treatment of non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Urol Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.022. PubMed DOI

Clegg NJ, Wongvipat J, Joseph JD, et al. ARN-509: a novel antiandrogen for prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2012;72(6):1494–1503. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3948. PubMed DOI PMC

Tran C, Ouk S, Clegg NJ, et al. Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Science. 2009;324(5928):787–790. doi: 10.1126/science.1168175. PubMed DOI PMC

Borgmann H, Lallous N, Ozistanbullu D, et al. Moving towards precision urologic oncology: targeting enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer and mutated forms of the androgen receptor using the novel inhibitor darolutamide (ODM-201) Eur Urol. 2018;73(1):4–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.012. PubMed DOI

Moilanen AM, Riikonen R, Oksala R, et al. Discovery of ODM-201, a new-generation androgen receptor inhibitor targeting resistance mechanisms to androgen signaling-directed prostate cancer therapies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12007. doi: 10.1038/srep12007. PubMed DOI PMC

Zurth C, Sandmann S, Trummel D, et al. Blood-brain barrier penetration of [14C] darolutamide compared with [14C] enzalutamide in rats using whole body autoradiography. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:345–345. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.345. DOI

Hebenstreit D, Pichler R, Heidegger I. Drug-drug interactions in prostate cancer treatment. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.016. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K, Massard C, Bono P, et al. Safety and antitumour activity of ODM-201 (BAY-1841788) in castration-resistant, CYP17 inhibitor-naive prostate cancer: results from extended follow-up of the ARADES trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(6):606–614. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.010. PubMed DOI

Fendler WP, Weber M, Iravani A, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7448–7454. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1050. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...