Apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
PubMed
32924096
PubMed Central
PMC7572325
DOI
10.1007/s10147-020-01777-9
PII: 10.1007/s10147-020-01777-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Apalutamide, Darolutamide, Enzalutamide, Network meta-analysis, Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer,
- MeSH
- antagonisté androgenních receptorů terapeutické užití MeSH
- benzamidy MeSH
- doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
- fenylthiohydantoin analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- kalikreiny metabolismus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- nitrily MeSH
- proporcionální rizikové modely MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen metabolismus MeSH
- protinádorové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- pyrazoly terapeutické užití MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- thiohydantoiny terapeutické užití MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antagonisté androgenních receptorů MeSH
- apalutamide MeSH Prohlížeč
- benzamidy MeSH
- darolutamide MeSH Prohlížeč
- enzalutamide MeSH Prohlížeč
- fenylthiohydantoin MeSH
- kalikreiny MeSH
- KLK3 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- nitrily MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
- pyrazoly MeSH
- thiohydantoiny MeSH
Management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) has undergone a paradigm shift with next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors. However, direct comparative data are not available to inform treatment decisions and/or guideline recommendations. Therefore, we performed network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments. Multiple databases were searched for articles published before June 2020. Studies that compared overall and/or metastasis-free and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (OS/MFS/PSA-PFS) and/or adverse events (AEs) in nmCRPC patients were considered eligible. Three studies (n = 4117) met our eligibility criteria. Formal network meta-analyses were conducted. For MFS, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide were significantly more effective than placebo, and apalutamide emerged as the best option (P score: 0.8809). Apalutamide [hazard ratio (HR): 0.85, 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.77-0.94] and enzalutamide (HR: 0.86, 95% CrI: 0.78-0.95) were both significantly more effective than darolutamide. For PSA-PFS, all three agents were statistically superior to placebo, and apalutamide emerged as the likely preferred option (P score: 1.000). Apalutamide (HR: 0.71, 95% CrI: 0.69-0.74) and enzalutamide (HR: 0.76, 95% CrI: 0.74-0.79) were both significantly more effective than darolutamide. For AEs (including all AEs, grade 3 or grade 4 AEs, grade 5 AEs, and discontinuation rates), darolutamide was the likely best option. Apalutamide and enzalutamide appear to be more efficacious agents for therapy of nmCRPC, while darolutamide appears to have the most favorable tolerability profile. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment strategies and inform future direct comparative trials.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Währinger Gürtel 18 20 1090 Vienna Austria
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
European Association of Urology Research Foundation Arnhem Netherlands
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. PubMed DOI
Kluth LA, Shariat SF, Kratzik C, et al. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and prostate cancer: implications for androgen deprivation therapy. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):669–676. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1157-5. PubMed DOI
Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502–1512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720. PubMed DOI
Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. New Engl J med. 2014;371(5):424–433. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095. PubMed DOI PMC
Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207506. PubMed DOI
Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. New Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):138–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. PubMed DOI PMC
de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):1995–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. PubMed DOI PMC
Oudard S. TROPIC: Phase III trial of cabazitaxel for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Future Oncol. 2011;7(4):497–506. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.23. PubMed DOI
Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411–422. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294. PubMed DOI
Hoskin P, Sartor O, O’Sullivan JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of radium-223 dichloride in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, with or without previous docetaxel use: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1397–1406. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70474-7. PubMed DOI
Mateo J, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, et al. Managing nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.035. PubMed DOI
Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2465–2474. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800536. PubMed DOI PMC
Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1408–1418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715546. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2019;380(13):1235–1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671. PubMed DOI
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2019) EAU Guidelines: Prostate Cancer 2019. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/
Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide and survival in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2197–2206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2003892. PubMed DOI
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–784. doi: 10.7326/m14-2385. PubMed DOI
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PubMed DOI PMC
van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, et al. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(4):285–299. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. PubMed DOI
Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):607–617. doi: 10.1177/0272989x12458724. PubMed DOI PMC
Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-54. PubMed DOI PMC
Rucker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. PubMed DOI
Small EJ, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30(11):1813–1820. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz397. PubMed DOI PMC
Hird AE, Magee DE, Bhindi B, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of novel androgen receptor inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.005. PubMed DOI
Kumar J, Jazayeri SB, Gautam S, et al. Comparative efficacy of apalutamide darolutamide and enzalutamide for treatment of non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Urol Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.022. PubMed DOI
Clegg NJ, Wongvipat J, Joseph JD, et al. ARN-509: a novel antiandrogen for prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2012;72(6):1494–1503. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3948. PubMed DOI PMC
Tran C, Ouk S, Clegg NJ, et al. Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Science. 2009;324(5928):787–790. doi: 10.1126/science.1168175. PubMed DOI PMC
Borgmann H, Lallous N, Ozistanbullu D, et al. Moving towards precision urologic oncology: targeting enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer and mutated forms of the androgen receptor using the novel inhibitor darolutamide (ODM-201) Eur Urol. 2018;73(1):4–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.012. PubMed DOI
Moilanen AM, Riikonen R, Oksala R, et al. Discovery of ODM-201, a new-generation androgen receptor inhibitor targeting resistance mechanisms to androgen signaling-directed prostate cancer therapies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12007. doi: 10.1038/srep12007. PubMed DOI PMC
Zurth C, Sandmann S, Trummel D, et al. Blood-brain barrier penetration of [14C] darolutamide compared with [14C] enzalutamide in rats using whole body autoradiography. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:345–345. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.345. DOI
Hebenstreit D, Pichler R, Heidegger I. Drug-drug interactions in prostate cancer treatment. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.016. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K, Massard C, Bono P, et al. Safety and antitumour activity of ODM-201 (BAY-1841788) in castration-resistant, CYP17 inhibitor-naive prostate cancer: results from extended follow-up of the ARADES trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(6):606–614. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.010. PubMed DOI
Fendler WP, Weber M, Iravani A, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7448–7454. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1050. PubMed DOI