Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
MC_UU_00022/2
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
Department of Health - United Kingdom
SPHSU13
Chief Scientist Office - United Kingdom
SPHSU17
Chief Scientist Office - United Kingdom
SCAF/15/02
Chief Scientist Office - United Kingdom
MC_UU_12017/13
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
PubMed
33010401
PubMed Central
PMC7526592
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037
PII: S0895-4356(20)31123-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- GRADE, Pandemic, Trustworthy guideline, Urgent recommendation,
- MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče metody organizace a řízení MeSH
- informační management * metody organizace a řízení MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- medicína založená na důkazech normy trendy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma normy MeSH
- systematický přehled jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. RESULTS: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. CONCLUSION: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest.
American College of Physicians 190 N Independence Mall West Philadelphia PA 19087 USA
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Medicine State University of New York at Buffalo 100 High Street Buffalo NY USA
Hospital Moinhos de Vento Porto Alegre Brazil
Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute 08025 Barcelona Spain
National Institute of Environmental Health Science Durham NC USA
Public Health Agency of Canada 785 Carling Avenue Ottawa Ontario Canada
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Schunemann H.J., Wiercioch W., Etxeandia I., Falavigna M., Santesso N., Mustafa R., et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ. 2014;186(3):E123–E142. PubMed PMC
Qaseem A., Forland F., Macbeth F., Ollenschlager G., Phillips S., van der Wees P., et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:525–531. PubMed
Alonso-Coello P., Oxman A.D., Moberg J., Brignardello-Petersen R., Akl E.A., Davoli M., et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (etd) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089. PubMed
Moberg J., Oxman A.D., Rosenbaum S., Schünemann H.J., Guyatt G., Flottorp S., et al. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Pol Syst. 2018;16(1):45. PubMed PMC
Neumann I., Brignardello-Petersen R., Wiercioch W., Carrasco-Labra A., Cuello C., Akl E., et al. The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels. Implement Sci. 2016;11:93. PubMed PMC
Thayer K.A., Schunemann H.J. Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:585–589. PubMed
Schunemann H.J., Hill S.R., Kakad M., Bellamy R., Uyeki T.M., Hayden F.G., et al. WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:21–31. PubMed PMC
Vernooij R.W., Sanabria A.J., Sola I., Alonso-Coello P., Martinez Garcia L. Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks. Implement Sci. 2014;9:3. PubMed PMC
Garritty C.M., Norris S.L., Moher D. Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;82:47–60. PubMed PMC
World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2003. Guidelines for WHO guidelines.
Florez I.D., Morgan R.L., Falavigna M., Kowalski S.C., Zhang Y., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I., et al. Development of rapid guidelines: 2. A qualitative study with WHO guideline developers. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):62. PubMed PMC
Kowalski S.C., Morgan R.L., Falavigna M., Florez I.D., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I., Wiercioch W., et al. Development of rapid guidelines: 1. Systematic survey of current practices and methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):61. PubMed PMC
Morgan R.L., Florez I., Falavigna M., Kowalski S., Akl E.A., Thayer K.A., et al. Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):63. PubMed PMC
World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2020. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection is suspected: interim guidance, 28 January 2020.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330893 Available at.
Schünemann H.J., Wiercioch W., Brozek J., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I., Mustafa R.A., Manja V., et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: grade-adolopment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:101–110. PubMed
World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2020. Infection Prevention and Control guidance for Long-Term Care Facilities in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 21 March 2020.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331508 Available at.
Bhimraj A., Morgan R.L., Shumaker A.H., Lavergne V., Baden L., Cheng V.C., et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the treatment and management of patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 PubMed PMC
Sultan S., Lim J.K., Altayar O., Davitkov P., Feuerstein J.D., Siddique S.M., et al. AGA institute rapid recommendations for gastrointestinal procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gastroenterology. 2020 PubMed PMC
Qaseem A., Yost J., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I., Miller M.C., Abraham G.M., Obley A.J., et al. Should clinicians use chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19? Ann Intern Med. 2020 PubMed PMC
Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) JAMA Cardiol. 2020 PubMed PMC
Alonso-Coello P., Schünemann H.J., Moberg J., Brignardello-Petersen R., Akl E.A., Davoli M., et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 2016:353. PubMed
Garritty C., Gartlehner G., Kamel C., King V., Nussbaumer-Streit B., Stevens A. Interim guidance from the cochrane rapid reviews methods group. Cochrane Rapid Rev. 2020;2020 PubMed PMC
Clinical characteristics of children with coronavirus disease 2019 in Hubei, China. Curr Med Sci. 2020;24 PubMed PMC
Rapid risk assessment of acute public health events. World Health Organization; 2012. https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/HSE_GAR_ARO_2012_1/en/ Available at.
Petkovic J., Riddle A., Akl E.A., Khabsa J., Lytvyn L., Atwere P., et al. Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):21. PubMed PMC
Morgan R.L., Whaley P., Thayer K.A., Schunemann H.J. Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):1027–1031. PubMed PMC
Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Kunz R., Atkins D., Brozek J., Vist G., et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:395–400. PubMed
Analysis of epidemiological and clinical features in older patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) out of Wuhan. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;25 PubMed PMC
Alhazzani W., Moller M.H., Arabi Y.M., Loeb M., Gong M.N., Fan E., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):854–887. PubMed PMC
Clinical observation and management of COVID-19 patients. Emerg. 2020;9(1):687–690. PubMed PMC
European Food Safety Authority Statement of EFSA on risks for public health due to the presence of melamine in infant milk and other milk products in China. EFSA J. 2008;6(9):807.
Darzi A., Harfouche M., Arayssi T., Alemadi S., Alnaqbi K.A., Badsha H., et al. Adaptation of the 2015 American College of Rheumatology treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis for the Eastern Mediterranean Region: an exemplar of the GRADE Adolopment. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):183. PubMed PMC
Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Kunz R., Woodcock J., Brozek J., Helfand M., et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303–1310. PubMed
Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., Burgers J.S., Cluzeau F., Feder G., et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–E842. PubMed PMC
Shea B.J., Reeves B.C., Wells G., Thuku M., Hamel C., Moran J., et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. PubMed PMC
Whiting P., Savovic J., Higgins J.P., Caldwell D.M., Reeves B.C., Shea B., et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:225–234. PubMed PMC
Garner P., Hopewell S., Chandler J., MacLehose H., Schunemann H.J., Akl E.A., et al. When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist. BMJ. 2016;354:i3507. PubMed PMC
National Toxicology Program National Toxicology Program research project: West Virginia chemical spill. Board of Scientific Counselors December 9–10, 2014 meeting. 2014. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/bsc/2014/dec/bsc_dec2014_minutes_508.pdf Available at.
National Toxicology Program Nomination Summary for West Virginia Elk River chemical spill (N21408) 2014. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/getinvolved/nominate/summary/nm-n21408.html?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=prod&utm_campaign=ntpgolinks&utm_term=nm-n21408 Available at.
Schunemann H.J., Zhang Y., Oxman A.D., Expert Evidence in Guidelines G Distinguishing opinion from evidence in guidelines. BMJ. 2019;366:l4606. PubMed
Schunemann H.J., Khabsa J., Solo K., Khamis A.M., Brignardello-Petersen R., El-Harakeh A., et al. Ventilation techniques and risk for transmission of coronavirus disease, including COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2020 PubMed
World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2019. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection is suspected: interim guidance.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/178529 Available at.
Stockman L.J., Bellamy R., Garner P. SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 2006;3(9):e343. PubMed PMC
Akl E.A., Meerpohl J.J., Elliott J., Kahale L.A., Schünemann H.J. Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;91:47–53. PubMed
Schunemann H.J., Wiercioch W., Brozek J., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I., Mustafa R.A., Manja V., et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: grade-adolopment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:101–110. PubMed
Djulbegovic B., Guyatt G. Evidence vs consensus in clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2019;322:725–726. PubMed PMC
Nisbet A.F. PHE publication; 2019. Public health protection in radiation emergencies.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805655/Advice_for_Radiation_Emergencies_2019.pdf Available at.
Fineberg H.V. Ten weeks to crush the curve. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:e37. PubMed