International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
P50 CA186781
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA107476
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA168762
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
33067414
PubMed Central
PMC7567803
DOI
10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3
PII: 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- lehké řetězce imunoglobulinů krev MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom krev MeSH
- myelomové proteiny metabolismus MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- lehké řetězce imunoglobulinů MeSH
- multiple myeloma M-proteins MeSH Prohlížeč
- myelomové proteiny MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor state of multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, MM was redefined to include biomarkers predicting a high risk of progression from SMM, thus necessitating a redefinition of SMM and its risk stratification. We assembled a large cohort of SMM patients meeting the revised IMWG criteria to develop a new risk stratification system. We included 1996 patients, and using stepwise selection and multivariable analysis, we identified three independent factors predicting progression risk at 2 years: serum M-protein >2 g/dL (HR: 2.1), involved to uninvolved free light-chain ratio >20 (HR: 2.7), and marrow plasma cell infiltration >20% (HR: 2.4). This translates into 3 categories with increasing 2-year progression risk: 6% for low risk (38%; no risk factors, HR: 1); 18% for intermediate risk (33%; 1 factor; HR: 3.0), and 44% for high risk (29%; 2-3 factors). Addition of cytogenetic abnormalities (t(4;14), t(14;16), +1q, and/or del13q) allowed separation into 4 groups (low risk with 0, low intermediate risk with 1, intermediate risk with 2, and high risk with ≥3 risk factors) with 6, 23, 46, and 63% risk of progression in 2 years, respectively. The 2/20/20 risk stratification model can be easily implemented to identify high-risk SMM for clinical research and routine practice and will be widely applicable.
Cedars Sinai Outpatient Cancer Center Los Angeles CA USA
Clinica Universidad de Navarra CIMA CIBERONC IDISNA Pamplona Spain
Department of Clinical Hematology Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
Department of Haematology London North West Healthcare London UK
Department of Hemato Oncology Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital Hwasung South Korea
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute Charlotte NC USA
Department of Hematology Hopital de La Milétrie CHU Poitiers France
Department of Hematology Hospital de Santa Maria Lisboa Portugal
Department of Hematology Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences University of Siena Siena Italy
Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Horsham PA USA
Perlmutter Cancer Center NY Langone Health New York NY USA
Service d'Hématologie Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980;302:1347–1349. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198006123022405. PubMed DOI
Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Mateos MV. Smoldering multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125:3069–3075. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-568899. PubMed DOI PMC
Kyle RA, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356:2582–2590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070389. PubMed DOI
Dispenzieri A, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111:785–789. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-108357. PubMed DOI PMC
Perez-Persona E, et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2007;110:2586–2592. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443. PubMed DOI
Mateos MV, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:438–447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300439. PubMed DOI
Lonial S, et al. E3A06: Randomized phase III trial of lenalidomide versus observation alone in patients with asymptomatic high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:8001–8001. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8001. DOI
Rajkumar SV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–e548. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. PubMed DOI
Zamagni E, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT focal, but not osteolytic, lesions predict the progression of smoldering myeloma to active disease. Leukemia. 2016;30:417–422. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.291. PubMed DOI
Rajkumar SV, et al. Impact of primary molecular cytogenetic abnormalities and risk of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2013;27:1738–1744. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.86. PubMed DOI PMC
Fernandez de Larrea C, et al. Evolving M-protein pattern in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma: impact on early progression. Leukemia. 2018;32:1427–1434. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0013-4. PubMed DOI
Ravi P, et al. Changes in uninvolved immunoglobulins during induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:e569. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.46. PubMed DOI PMC
Gonzalez-Calle V, et al. Bence Jones proteinuria in smoldering multiple myeloma as a predictor marker of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2016;30:2026–2031. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.123. PubMed DOI
Dhodapkar MV, et al. Clinical, genomic, and imaging predictors of myeloma progression from asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies (SWOG S0120) Blood. 2014;123:78–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515239. PubMed DOI PMC
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45:5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. DOI
Svetnik V, et al. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2003;43:1947–1958. doi: 10.1021/ci034160g. PubMed DOI
Massaro JM, et al. Managing and analysing data from a large-scale study on Framingham offspring relating brain structure to cognitive function. Stat. Med. 2004;23:351–367. doi: 10.1002/sim.1743. PubMed DOI
Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:1860–1873. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041875. PubMed DOI
Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas - current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:409–421. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0018-y. PubMed DOI
Witzig TE, et al. A phase III randomized trial of thalidomide plus zoledronic acid versus zoledronic acid alone in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2013;27:220–225. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.236. PubMed DOI PMC
Rajkumar SV, et al. Thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage myeloma. Leukemia. 2003;17:775–779. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402866. PubMed DOI
Lakshman A, et al. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:59. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Misund K, et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020;34:322–326. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0543-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Bustoros, M. et al. Genomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progression. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 2380–2389 (2020). PubMed PMC
Manier S, Kawano Y, Bianchi G, Roccaro AM, Ghobrial IM. Cell autonomous and microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression in precursor states of multiple myeloma. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2016;23:426–433. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000259. PubMed DOI
Dhodapkar MV. MGUS to myeloma: a mysterious gammopathy of underexplored significance. Blood. 2016;128:2599–2606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692954. PubMed DOI PMC
Epidemiology, genetics and treatment of multiple myeloma and precursor diseases