Aortic valve replacement: validation of the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33207035
PubMed Central
PMC7835556
DOI
10.1002/ehf2.12961
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Aortic stenosis, Aortic valve replacement, Quality of life, Questionnaire,
- MeSH
- aortální chlopeň MeSH
- aortální stenóza * diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Kanada MeSH
AIMS: There is no quality of life tool specifically developed for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to assess how this chronic condition and its treatment affect patients. The Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) has been developed to overcome this gap. The results of the validation of the TASQ in patients undergoing treatment for severe AS are presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study at 10 centres in Europe and Canada, which enrolled 274 patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Mean TASQ score at baseline was 71.2 points and increased to 88.9 three months after aortic valve implantation (P < 0.001). Increases were seen for the emotional impact (32.0 to 39.0; P < 0.001), physical limitations (14.8 to 22.0; P < 0.001), and physical symptoms (8.5 vs. 11.0; P < 0.001) domains. Internal consistency was good/excellent for overall TASQ score (α = 0.891) and for the physical limitation, emotional impact, and social limitation domains (α = 0.815-0.950). Test-retest reliability was excellent or strong for the overall TASQ (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.883) and for the physical symptoms, physical limitation, emotional impact, and social limitation domains (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.791-0.895). Responsiveness was medium overall (Cohen's d = 0.637) and medium/large for physical symptoms, emotional impact, and physical limitations (0.661-0.812). Sensitivity to change was significant for physical symptoms, physical limitations (both P < 0.001), emotional impact (P = 0.003), and social limitations (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The TASQ is a new, brief, self-administered, and clinically relevant health-specific tool to measure changes in quality of life in patients with AS undergoing an intervention.
Department of Cardiac Surgery Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Cardiology Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
Department of Cardiology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital Paris France
Department of Cardiology Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Juan Canalejo Coruña Spain
Department of Cardiology Hospital Vall d'Hebron CIBER CV Barcelona Spain
Department of Psychiatry University Health Network Toronto Canada
Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Verona Verona Italy
Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland
Edwards Lifesciences Prague Czech Republic
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Frey N, Steeds RP, Rudolph TK, Thambyrajah J, Serra A, Schulz E, Maly J, Aiello M, Lloyd G, Bortone AS, Hauptmann KE, Clerici A, Delle Karth G, Rieber J, Indorfi C, Mancone M, Belle L, Lauten A, Arnold M, Bouma BJ, Lutz M, Pohlmann C, Kurucova J, Thoenes M, Bramlage P, Messika‐Zeitoun D, group Ir . Symptoms, disease severity and treatment of adults with a new diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2019; 105: 1709–1716. PubMed
Arnold SV, Reynolds MR, Wang K, Magnuson EA, Baron SJ, Chinnakondepalli KM, Reardon MJ, Tadros PN, Zorn GL, Maini B, Mumtaz MA, Brown JM, Kipperman RM, Adams DH, Popma JJ, Cohen DJ, CoreValve USPTI. Health status after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk: results from the CoreValve US Pivotal Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1207–1217. PubMed PMC
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Leon MB, Smith CR, Reynolds MR, Webb JG, Svensson LG, Cohen DJ. Use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for monitoring health status in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Heart Fail 2013; 6: 61–67. PubMed
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Vemulapalli S, Li Z, Matsouaka RA, Baron SJ, Vora AN, Mack MJ, Reynolds MR, Rumsfeld JS, Cohen DJ. Quality‐of‐life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an unselected population: A report from the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2: 409–416. PubMed PMC
Frank D, Kennon S, Bonaros N, Romano M, Lefevre T, Di Mario C, Stefano P, Ribichini FL, Himbert D, Urena‐Alcazar M, Salgado‐Fernandez J, Cuenca Castillo JJ, Garcia B, Kurucova J, Thoenes M, Luske C, Bramlage P, Styra R. Trial protocol for the validation of the ‘Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life (TASQ) Questionnaire’ in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the TASQ registry. Open Heart 2019; 6: e001008. PubMed PMC
Styra R, Dimas M, Svitak K, Kapoor M, Osten M, Ouzounian M, Devins G, Deckert A, Horlick E. Toronto aortic stenosis quality of life questionnaire (TASQ): validation in TAVI patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2020; 20: 209. PubMed PMC
Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1245–1255. PubMed
Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, Leon MB, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Babaliaros VC, Bowers BS, Fearon WF, Herrmann HC, Kapadia S, Kodali SK, Makkar RR, Pichard AD, Cohen DJ. Placement of aortic transcatheter valves I. Health‐related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2011; 124: 1964–1972. PubMed
Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Wang K, Thourani VH, Williams M, Zajarias A, Rihal CS, Brown DL, Smith CR, Leon MB, Cohen DJ, Investigators PT. Health‐related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high‐risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial (Cohort A). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 548–558. PubMed
Muller‐Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich SN. Comparison of the short form (SF)‐12 health status instrument with the SF‐36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 2004; 90: 523–527. PubMed PMC
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233. PubMed
Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 99–103. PubMed
Del Buono MG, Buckley L, Abbate A. Primary and secondary diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2018; 122: 1578–1587. PubMed PMC
Sato K, Kumar A, Jones BM, Mick SL, Krishnaswamy A, Grimm RA, Desai MY, Griffin BP, Rodriguez LL, Kapadia SR, Obuchowski NA, Popovic ZB. Reversibility of cardiac function predicts outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e005798. PubMed PMC
Grimard BH, Safford RE, Burns EL. Aortic stenosis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93: 371–378. PubMed
Chandra A, Vaduganathan M, Lewis EF, Claggett BL, Rizkala AR, Wang W, Lefkowitz MP, Shi VC, Anand IS, Ge J, Lam CSP, Maggioni AP, Martinez F, Packer M, Pfeffer MA, Pieske B, Redfield MM, Rouleau JL, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Zannad F, Zile MR, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Health‐related quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the PARAGON‐HF trial. JACC Heart Fail 2019; 7: 862–874. PubMed
Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient‐reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2014; 155: 799–808. PubMed PMC
Lewis EF, Johnson PA, Johnson W, Collins C, Griffin L, Stevenson LW. Preferences for quality of life or survival expressed by patients with heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001; 20: 1016–1024. PubMed
Kraai IH, Vermeulen KM, Luttik ML, Hoekstra T, Jaarsma T, Hillege HL. Preferences of heart failure patients in daily clinical practice: quality of life or longevity? Eur J Heart Fail 2013; 15: 1113–1121. PubMed
Horrocks J, Closs J, Astin F. Quality of life in older adults with aortic stenosis: a narrative review. Int J Older People Nurs 2014; 9: 227–246. PubMed
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, Green P, Kirtane AJ, Kapadia S, Thourani VH, Herrmann HC, Beohar N, Zajarias A, Mack MJ, Leon MB, Cohen DJ. How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (PARTNER) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 591–597. PubMed PMC
A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study
Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review