A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
Grantová podpora
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine GmbH
Edwards Lifesciences and performed under the sponsorship of IPPMed
PubMed
38554125
PubMed Central
PMC11143387
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147
PII: 7637935
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Aortic stenosis, Clinical care, Health services, Prospective registry, Quality of care, TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation,
- MeSH
- aortální stenóza * chirurgie MeSH
- benchmarking * MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů MeSH
- délka pobytu * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- kritické cesty MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries. METHODS: This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60 min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95 min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.
Cardiac Center IKEM Prague Prague Czech Republic
Cardiology Besancon Regional University Hospital Center Besancon France
Cardiology Centro Cardiologico Monzino Milan Italy
Cardiology Department Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga Malaga Spain
Cardiology Department Hospital Sindelfingen Böblingen Sindelfingen Germany
Cardiology Department James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK
Cardiology Department Mater Private Network Dublin Ireland
Cardiology Department Montpellier University Hospital Montpellier University Montpellier France
Cardiology Department University Hospital Son Espases Palma de Mallorca Spain
Cardiology Polyclinique Du Bois Lille France
Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares Madrid Spain
Department de Cardiologie Hôpital de Pitié Salpêtrière AP HP Paris France
Department for Cardiovascular Surgery Artemed Klinikum München München Germany
Department of Cardiology and Pulmonology Georg August University Göttingen Germany
Department of Cardiology Hospital Floridsdorf Vienna Austria
Department of Cardiology Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France
Department of Cardiology Kerckhoff Klinik Bad Nauheim Germany
Department of Cardiology The Clinique de l'Infirmerie Protestante Lyon France
Department of Cardiology Univ Rouen Normandie Inserm U1096 CHU Rouen Rouen France
Department of Cardiology University Medicine Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany
Department of Cardiology University of Bologna Policlinico S Orsola Malpighi Bologna Italy
Department of Cardiology University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest Romania
Department of Internal Medicine 3 Arnold Heller Strasse 3 Haus K3 Kiel 24105 Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 3 Cardiology University Hospital St Pölten St Pölten Austria
Department of Interventional Cardiology Hôpital Saint Joseph Marseille France
Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland
Edwards Lifesciences Prague Czech Republic
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
Karl Landsteiner Institute for Cardiovascular and Critical Care Research Vienna Vienna Austria
Medical Department 3 Heart Center Trier Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier Germany
Struttura Complessa of Cardiology Ospedale Mauriziano Torino Italy
Université de Rennes 1 CHU Rennes Service de Cardiologie Inserm LTSI U1099 Rennes France
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae174 PubMed
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Vendrik J, Vlastra W, van Mourik MS, Delewi R, Beijk MA, Lemkes J, et al. Early mobilisation after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results of the MobiTAVI trial. Neth Heart J 2020;28:240–8. 10.1007/s12471-020-01374-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Lauck SB, Wood DA, Baumbusch J, Kwon JY, Stub D, Achtem L, et al. Vancouver transcatheter aortic valve replacement clinical pathway: minimalist approach, standardized care, and discharge criteria to reduce length of stay. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9:312–21. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002541 PubMed DOI
Barbanti M, Capranzano P, Ohno Y, Attizzani GF, Gulino S, Imme S, et al. Early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 2015;101:1485–90. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307351 PubMed DOI
Aldalati O, Keshavarzi F, Kaura A, Byrne J, Eskandari M, Deshpande R, et al. Factors associated with safe early discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiol J 2018;25:14–23. 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0087 PubMed DOI
Alkhalil A, Lamba H, Deo S, Bezerra HG, Patel SM, Markowitz A, et al. Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;91:345–53. 10.1002/ccd.27230 PubMed DOI
Mallikethi-Reddy S, Akintoye E, Telila T, Sudhakar R, Jagadeesh K, Briasoulis A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United States: predictors of early hospital discharge. J Interv Cardiol 2017;30:149–55. 10.1111/joic.12373 PubMed DOI
Kamioka N, Wells J, Keegan P, Lerakis S, Binongo J, Corrigan F, et al. Predictors and clinical outcomes of next-day discharge after minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:107–15. 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.021 PubMed DOI
Durand E, Eltchaninoff H, Canville A, Bouhzam N, Godin M, Tron C, et al. Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:1116–22. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.546 PubMed DOI
Serletis-Bizios A, Durand E, Cellier G, Tron C, Bauer F, Glinel B, et al. A prospective analysis of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2016;118:866–72. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.035 PubMed DOI
Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, Humphries KH, Cook R, Welsh R, et al. The Vancouver 3 M (multidisciplinary, multimodality, but minimalist) clinical pathway facilitates safe next-day discharge home at low-, medium-, and high-volume transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers: the 3 M TAVR study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:459–69. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020 PubMed DOI
Lauck SB, Sathananthan J, Park J, Achtem L, Smith A, Keegan P, et al. Post-procedure protocol to facilitate next-day discharge: results of the multidisciplinary, multimodality but minimalist TAVR study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;96:450–8. 10.1002/ccd.28617 PubMed DOI
Butala NM, Wood DA, Li H, Chinnakondepalli K, Lauck SB, Sathananthan J, et al. Economics of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the 3M-TAVR economic study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:e012168. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012168 PubMed DOI PMC
Barbanti M, van Mourik MS, Spence MS, Iacovelli F, Martinelli GL, Muir DF, et al. Optimising patient discharge management after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the multicentre European FAST-TAVI trial. EuroIntervention 2019;15:147–54. 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01197 PubMed DOI
Barbanti M, Baan J, Spence MS, Iacovelli F, Martinelli GL, Saia F, et al. Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation—rationale and design of the FAST-TAVI registry. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:259. 10.1186/s12872-017-0693-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Lauck S, Forman J, Borregaard B, Sathananthan J, Achtem L, McCalmont G, et al. Facilitating transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era of COVID-19: recommendations for programmes. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2020;19:537–44. 10.1177/1474515120934057 PubMed DOI PMC
Bohmann K, Burgdorf C, Zeus T, Joner M, Alvarez H, Berning KL, et al. The COORDINATE pilot study: impact of a transcatheter aortic valve coordinator program on hospital and patient outcomes. J Clin Med 2022;11:1205. 10.3390/jcm11051205 PubMed DOI PMC
McCalmont G, Durand E, Lauck S, Muir DF, Spence MS, Vasa-Nicotera M, et al. Setting a benchmark for resource utilization and quality of care in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Europe-rationale and design of the international BENCHMARK registry. Clin Cardiol 2021;44:1344–53. 10.1002/clc.23711 PubMed DOI PMC
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914–9. 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016 PubMed DOI
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 PubMed DOI
Frank D, Kennon S, Bonaros N, Stastny L, Romano M, Lefevre T, et al. Aortic valve replacement: validation of the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire. ESC Heart Fail 2021;8:270–9. 10.1002/ehf2.12961 PubMed DOI PMC
Lortz J, Lortz TP, Johannsen L, Rammos C, Steinmetz M, Lind A, et al. Clinical process optimization of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Future Cardiol 2021;17:321–7. 10.2217/fca-2020-0010 PubMed DOI
Durand E, Beziau-Gasnier D, Michel M, Iung B, Tchetche D, Bonnet G, et al. Reducing length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the FAST-TAVI II trial. Eur Heart J 2024;45:952–62. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae081 PubMed DOI
Reddavid C, Costa G, Valvo R, Criscione E, Strazzieri O, Motta S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation during COVID-19 pandemic: an optimized model to relieve healthcare system overload. Int J Cardiol 2022;352:190–4. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.038 PubMed DOI PMC
Valdebenito M, Massalha E, Barbash IM, Maor E, Fefer P, Guetta V, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Cardiol 2021;145:97–101. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.086 PubMed DOI PMC
Tan J, Teoh TK, Ivanova J, Jadhav S, Varcoe R, Baig K, et al. 17 the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) services in the United Kingdom: a tertiary centre experience. Heart 2021;107:A13–4. 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-BCS.17 DOI
Ryffel C, Alaour B, Tomii D, Okuno T, Temperli F, Bruno J, et al. Impact of COVID-19 surge periods on clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2023;204:32–9. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.072 PubMed DOI
Joseph J, Kotronias RA, Estrin-Serlui T, Cahill TJ, Kharbanda RK, Newton JD, et al. Safety and operational efficiency of restructuring and redeploying a transcatheter aortic valve replacement service during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Oxford experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2021;31:26–31. 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.12.002 PubMed DOI PMC
Avvedimento M, Real C, Nuche J, Farjat-Pasos J, Galhardo A, Trinh KH, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of bleeding events after TAVR according to VARC-3 criteria. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:2262–74. 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.005 PubMed DOI
Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu Maria C, Nazif T, Hahn Rebecca T, Pibarot P, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:2717–46. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038 PubMed DOI
Lauck SB, Arnold SV, Borregaard B, Sathananthan J, Humphries KH, Baron SJ, et al. Very early changes in quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the 3 M TAVR trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2020;21:1573–8. 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.044 PubMed DOI
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Vemulapalli S, Li Z, Matsouaka RA, Baron SJ, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an unselected population: a report from the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:409–16. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5302 PubMed DOI PMC
Bona V, Khawaja MZ, Bapat V, Young C, Hancock J, Redwood S, et al. Early and late changes in quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the transfemoral and transapical approaches. EuroIntervention 2015;11:221–9. 10.4244/EIJV11I2A41 PubMed DOI
Lauck SB, Yu M, Ding L, Hardiman S, Wong D, Sathananthan J, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a “real world” population: insights from a prospective Canadian database. CJC Open 2021;3:1033–42. 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.006 PubMed DOI PMC
Krishnaswamy A, Kaur S, Isogai T, Zhou L, Shekhar S, Yun J, et al. Minimalist mitral valve-in-valve replacement using conscious sedation and intracardiac echocardiography is feasible and safe. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:1288–90. 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.022 PubMed DOI
Steeds RP, Lutz M, Thambyrajah J, Serra A, Schulz E, Maly J, et al. Facilitated data relay and effects on treatment of severe aortic stenosis in Europe. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e013160. 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160 PubMed DOI PMC