Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31549578
PubMed Central
PMC6806053
DOI
10.1161/jaha.119.013160
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Quality of care, aortic stenosis, facilitated data relay, surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve implantation,
- MeSH
- Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging nursing therapy MeSH
- Balloon Valvuloplasty * adverse effects MeSH
- Time-to-Treatment * MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation * adverse effects MeSH
- Echocardiography MeSH
- Clinical Decision-Making MeSH
- Referral and Consultation * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Watchful Waiting * MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Nurse's Role * MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement * adverse effects MeSH
- Eligibility Determination MeSH
- Patient Selection MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Background Many patients with severe aortic stenosis are referred late with advanced symptoms or inappropriately denied intervention. The objective was to investigate whether a structured communication to referring physicians (facilitated data relay) might improve the rate and timeliness of intervention. Methods and Results A prospective registry of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis at 23 centers in 9 European countries with transcatheter as well as surgical aortic valve replacement being available was performed. The study included a 3-month documentation of the status quo (phase A), a 6-month intervention phase (implementing facilitated data relay), and a 3-month documentation of a legacy effect (phase-B). Two thousand one hundred seventy-one patients with severe aortic stenoses were enrolled (phase A: 759; intervention: 905; phase-B: 507). Mean age was 77.9±10.0 years, and 80% were symptomatic, including 52% with severe symptoms. During phase A, intervention was planned in 464/696 (67%), 138 (20%) were assigned to watchful waiting, 8 (1%) to balloon aortic valvuloplasty, 60 (9%) were listed as not for active treatment, and in 26 (4%), no decision was made. Three hundred sixty-three of 464 (78%) patients received the planned intervention within 3 months. Timeliness of the intervention improved as shown by the higher number of aortic valve replacements performed within 3 months (59% versus 51%, P=0.002) and a significant decrease in the time to intervention (36±38 versus 30±33 days, P=0.002). Conclusions A simple, low-cost, facilitated data relay improves timeliness of treatment for patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis, resulting in a shorter time to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This effect was mainly driven by a significant improvement in timeliness of intervention in transcatheter aortic valve replacement but not surgical aortic valve replacement. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02241447.
4th Medical Department Hietzing Hospital Vienna Austria
Cardiology Department 1 University Clinic Mainz Germany
Centre Hospital d'Annecy France
Department of Cardiology and Angiology University of Kiel Germany
Department of Cardiology University Hospital Erlangen Germany
Department of Cardiology University of Cologne Heart Center Cologne Germany
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Foundation IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo Pavia Italy
Division of Cardiology and URT CNR of IFC University Magna Graecia Catanzaro Italy
Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research University Heart Center and Charité Berlin Germany
Herzkatheterlabor Nymphenburg and Department of Cardiology University of Munich Germany
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
Interventional Cardiology Unit Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
James Cook Hospital Middlesbrough UK
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier Germany
Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham UK
Sapienza University of Rome Italy
St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromso study. Heart. 2013;99:396–400. PubMed
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Munoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791. PubMed
Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, Calhoon JH, Desai MY, Kaul S, Lee JC, Ruiz CE, Vassileva CM. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1313–1346. PubMed
Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Baron‐Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, Borger MA, Carrel TP, De Bonis M, Evangelista A, Falk V, Lung B, Lancellotti P, Pierard L, Price S, Schafers HJ, Schuler G, Stepinska J, Swedberg K, Takkenberg J, Von Oppell UO, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zembala M. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–S44. PubMed
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM III, Thomas JD, Members AATF. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:e521–e643. PubMed
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke‐Barwolf C, Levang OW, Tornos P, Vanoverschelde JL, Vermeer F, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–1243. PubMed
Freed BH, Sugeng L, Furlong K, Mor‐Avi V, Raman J, Jeevanandam V, Lang RM. Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and potential solutions. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1339–1342. PubMed
Heuvelman HJ, van Geldorp MW, Kappetein AP, Geleijnse ML, Galema TW, Bogers AJ, Takkenberg JJ. Clinical course of patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis in the Rotterdam area: insights from the AVARIJN study. Neth Heart J. 2012;20:487–493. PubMed PMC
Chan RH, Shaw JL, Hauser TH, Markson LJ, Manning WJ. Guideline adherence for echocardiographic follow‐up in outpatients with at least moderate valvular disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:795–801. PubMed
Ahmed A, Sorajja P, Garberich RF, Farivar RS, Harris KM, Gossl M. Association of guideline adherence for serial evaluations with survival and adverse clinical events in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:1141–1146. PubMed PMC
Malaisrie SC, McDonald E, Kruse J, Li Z, McGee EC Jr, Abicht TO, Russell H, McCarthy PM, Andrei AC. Mortality while waiting for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1564–1570; discussion 1570–1561. PubMed
Lund O, Nielsen TT, Emmertsen K, Flo C, Rasmussen B, Jensen FT, Pilegaard HK, Kristensen LH, Hansen OK. Mortality and worsening of prognostic profile during waiting time for valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;44:289–295. PubMed
Dziadzko V, Clavel MA, Dziadzko M, Medina‐Inojosa JR, Michelena H, Maalouf J, Nkomo V, Thapa P, Enriquez‐Sarano M. Outcome and undertreatment of mitral regurgitation: a community cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:960–969. PubMed PMC
Frey N, Steeds RP, Serra A, Schulz E, Baldus S, Lutz M, Pohlmann C, Kurucova J, Bramlage P, Messika‐Zeitoun D. Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis—rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE). BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17:5. PubMed PMC
Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F Jr, Otto CM. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:372–392. PubMed
Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10:20–30. PubMed
Iung B, Messika‐Zeitoun D, Cachier A, Delahaye F, Baron G, Tornos P, Gohlke‐Barwolf C, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. Actual management of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve disease: how practice fits with guidelines. Am Heart J. 2007;153:696–703. PubMed
Schwarz F, Baumann P, Manthey J, Hoffmann M, Schuler G, Mehmel HC, Schmitz W, Kubler W. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation. 1982;66:1105–1110. PubMed
Horstkotte D, Loogen F. The natural history of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 1988;9(Suppl E):57–64. PubMed
Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, Czerny M, Mundigler G, Graf S, Bergler‐Klein J, Grimm M, Gabriel H, Maurer G. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:151–156. PubMed
Lancellotti P, Rosenhek R, Pibarot P, Iung B, Otto CM, Tornos P, Donal E, Prendergast B, Magne J, La Canna G, Pierard LA, Maurer G. ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease position paper–heart valve clinics: organization, structure, and experiences. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1597–1606. PubMed
Chambers JB, Ray S, Prendergast B, Taggart D, Westaby S, Grothier L, Arden C, Wilson J, Campbell B, Sandoe J, Gohlke‐Barwolf C, Mestres CA, Rosenhek R, Otto C. Specialist valve clinics: recommendations from the British Heart Valve Society working group on improving quality in the delivery of care for patients with heart valve disease. Heart. 2013;99:1714–1716. PubMed
Zilberszac R, Lancellotti P, Gilon D, Gabriel H, Schemper M, Maurer G, Massetti M, Rosenhek R. Role of a heart valve clinic programme in the management of patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:138–144. PubMed
Taggu W, Topham A, Hart L, Carr‐White G, Sulke N, Patel NR, Lloyd G. A cardiac sonographer led follow up clinic for heart valve disease. Int J Cardiol. 2009;132:240–243. PubMed
Shojania KG, Ranji SR, Shaw LK, Charo LN, Lai JC, Rushakoff RJ, McDonald KM, Owens DK. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 1: series overview and methodology). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2004. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43908/. PubMed
Walsh JM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, Sundaram V, Nayak S, Lewis R, Owens DK, Goldstein MK. Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care. 2006;44:646–657. PubMed
Wijeysundera HC, Wong WW, Bennell MC, Fremes SE, Radhakrishnan S, Peterson M, Ko DT. Impact of wait times on the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe aortic valve disease: a discrete event simulation model. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1162–1169. PubMed
A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study
IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis across Europe
Impact of selected comorbidities on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02241447