IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis across Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33419934
PubMed Central
PMC7798778
DOI
10.1136/openhrt-2020-001443
PII: openhrt-2020-001443
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- aortic valve stenosis, endovascular procedures, transcatheter aortic valve replacement,
- MeSH
- aortální chlopeň chirurgie MeSH
- aortální stenóza epidemiologie chirurgie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sexuální faktory MeSH
- srdeční chlopně umělé * MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně metody MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
AIMS: There is an increasing awareness of gender-related differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis and their outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Data from the IMPULSE registry were analysed. Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) were enrolled between March 2015 and April 2017 and stratified by gender. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of age. RESULTS: Overall, 2171 patients were enrolled, and 48.0% were female. Women were characterised by a higher rate of renal impairment (31.7 vs 23.3%; p<0.001), were at higher surgical risk (EuroSCORE II: 4.5 vs 3.6%; p=0.001) and more often in a critical preoperative state (7.0vs 4.2%; p=0.003). Men had an increased rate of previous cardiac surgery (9.4 vs 4.7%; p<0.001) and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (4.9 vs 1.3%; p<0.001). Concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve disease was substantially more common among women. Symptoms were highly prevalent in both women and men (83.6 vs 77.3%; p<0.001). AVR was planned in 1379 cases. Women were more frequently scheduled to undergo TAVI (49.3 vs 41.0%; p<0.001) and less frequently for SAVR (20.3 vs 27.5%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that female patients with severe AS have a distinct patient profile and are managed in a different way to males. Gender-based differences in the management of patients with severe AS need to be taken into account more systematically to improve outcomes, especially for women.
4th Medical Department Hietzing Hospital Vienna Austria
Cardiology Department AKH Celle Celle Germany
Centre Hospital d'Annecy Annecy France
Department for Cardiology Helios Erfurt Clinic Erfurt Germany
Department of Cardiology and Angiology University of Kiel Kiel Germany
Department of Cardiology University of Erlangen Erlangen Germany
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Foundation IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo Pavia Italy
Division of Cardiology and URT CNR of IFC University Magna Graecia Catanzaro Italy
Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland
Edwards Lifesciences Prague Czech Republic
Herzkatheterlabor Nymphenburg and Department of Cardiology University of Munich Munich Germany
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
Interventional Cardiology Unit Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK
Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Caponcello MG, Banderas LM, Ferrero C, et al. . Gender differences in aortic valve replacement: is surgical aortic valve replacement riskier and transcatheter aortic valve replacement safer in women than in men? J Thorac Dis 2020;12:3737–46. 10.21037/jtd-20-700 PubMed DOI PMC
Szerlip M, Gualano S, Holper E, et al. . Sex-specific outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 valve: insights from the PARTNER II S3 high-risk and intermediate-risk cohorts. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:13–20. 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.035 PubMed DOI
Fuchs C, Mascherbauer J, Rosenhek R, et al. . Gender differences in clinical presentation and surgical outcome of aortic stenosis. Heart 2010;96:539–45. 10.1136/hrt.2009.186650 PubMed DOI
Wong SC, Yeo I, Bergman G, et al. . The influence of gender on in-hospital clinical outcome following isolated mitral or aortic heart valve surgery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019;20:468–74. 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.08.004 PubMed DOI
O'Connor SA, Morice M-C, Gilard M, et al. . Revisiting sex equality with transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes: a collaborative, patient-level meta-analysis of 11,310 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:221–8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.024 PubMed DOI
Zhao Z-G, Liao Y-B, Peng Y, et al. . Sex-related differences in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:543–51. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000529 PubMed DOI
Conrotto F, D'Ascenzo F, Presbitero P, et al. . Effect of gender after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:809–16. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.089 PubMed DOI
Stangl V, Baldenhofer G, Laule M, et al. . Influence of sex on outcome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Cardiol 2014;27:531–9. 10.1111/joic.12150 PubMed DOI
Chandrasekhar J, Dangas G, Yu J, et al. . Sex-based differences in outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve therapy: TVT registry from 2011 to 2014. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2733–44. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.041 PubMed DOI
Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. . Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1695–705. 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052 PubMed DOI
Frey N, Steeds RP, Serra A, et al. . Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis – rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE). BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:5. 10.1186/s12872-016-0439-4 PubMed DOI PMC
Frey N, Steeds RP, Rudolph TK, et al. . Symptoms, disease severity and treatment of adults with a new diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2019;105:1709–16. 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314940 PubMed DOI
Steeds RP, Lutz M, Thambyrajah J, et al. . Facilitated data relay and effects on treatment of severe aortic stenosis in Europe. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e013160. 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160 PubMed DOI PMC
Lutz M, Messika-Zeitoun D, Rudolph TK, et al. . Differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in different European centres. Open Heart 2020;7:e001345. 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001345 PubMed DOI PMC
Rudolph TK, Messika-Zeitoun D, Frey N, et al. . Impact of selected comorbidities on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis. Open Heart 2020;7:e001271. 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001271 PubMed DOI PMC
Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. . Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970;10:20–30. 10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20 PubMed DOI
Singh A, Chan DCS, Greenwood JP, et al. . Symptom onset in aortic stenosis: relation to sex differences in left ventricular remodeling. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:96–105. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.019 PubMed DOI
Dobson LE, Musa TA, Uddin A, et al. . Gender influences left ventricular remodelling in the setting of aortic stenosis but does not appear to impact on reverse remodelling following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:P332 10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P332 DOI
Bech-Hanssen O, Wallentin I, Houltz E, et al. . Gender differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis: impact on preoperative left ventricular geometry and function, as well as early postoperative morbidity and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:24–30. 10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00268-1 PubMed DOI
Rosenfeld CS. Sex-dependent differences in voluntary physical activity. J Neurosci Res 2017;95:279–90. 10.1002/jnr.23896 PubMed DOI PMC
O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH. Mitral valve regurgitation. Curr Probl Cardiol 1984;9:1–52. 10.1016/0146-2806(84)90021-5 PubMed DOI
Andersen MJ, Nishimura RA, Borlaug BA. The hemodynamic basis of exercise intolerance in tricuspid regurgitation. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:911–7. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001575 PubMed DOI
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. . 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391 PubMed DOI
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. . A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231–43. 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00201-X PubMed DOI
Elhmidi Y, Piazza N, Mazzitelli D, et al. . Sex-related differences in 2197 patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2014;29:772–8. 10.1111/jocs.12442 PubMed DOI
Chaker Z, Badhwar V, Alqahtani F, et al. . Sex differences in the utilization and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6. 10.1161/JAHA.117.006370. [Epub ahead of print: 21 Sep 2017]. PubMed DOI PMC
Hayashida K, Morice M-C, Chevalier B, et al. . Sex-related differences in clinical presentation and outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:566–71. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.877 PubMed DOI
Rodés-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, et al. . Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:701–11. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001681 PubMed DOI
Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM, et al. . The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:14–22. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090 PubMed DOI
Kuten D, Krajcer Z. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in women. Tex Heart Inst J 2017;44:341–4. 10.14503/THIJ-17-6241 PubMed DOI PMC
Nguyen TC, Babaliaros VC, Razavi SA, et al. . Impact of varying degrees of renal dysfunction on transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:1399–407. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.065 PubMed DOI
Chiha J, Mitchell P, Gopinath B, et al. . Gender differences in the severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015;8:161–6. 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.07.009 PubMed DOI PMC
Williams M, Kodali SK, Hahn RT, et al. . Sex-related differences in outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: insights from the PARTNER Trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1522–8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.036 PubMed DOI
Skelding KA, Yakubov SJ, Kleiman NS, et al. . Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery in women at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (from the CoreValve us high risk pivotal trial). Am J Cardiol 2016;118:560–6. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.051 PubMed DOI
Malaisrie SC, McDonald E, Kruse J, et al. . Mortality while waiting for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1564–71. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.040 PubMed DOI
Ersboll M, Samad Z, Al Enezi F, et al. . Temporal trends in disease severity and predicted surgical risk at the time of referral for echocardiography in patients diagnosed with aortic stenosis. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2015;14:103–9. 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000048 PubMed DOI
Siontis GCM, Praz F, Pilgrim T, et al. . Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2016;37:3503–12. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225 PubMed DOI
Panoulas VF, Francis DP, Ruparelia N, et al. . Female-specific survival advantage from transcatheter aortic valve implantation over surgical aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis of the gender subgroups of randomised controlled trials including 3758 patients. Int J Cardiol 2018;250:66–72. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.047 PubMed DOI
Eltchaninoff H, Bonaros N, Prendergast B, et al. . Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter heart valve replacement in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention (Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis [RHEIA] trial). Am Heart J 2020;228:27–35. 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.016 PubMed DOI