Management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in the TAVI-era: how recent recommendations are translated into clinical practice

. 2021 Jan ; 8 (1) : .

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33431618
Odkazy

PubMed 33431618
PubMed Central PMC7802661
DOI 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001485
PII: openhrt-2020-001485
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 3.4% of adults aged >75 years suffer from aortic stenosis (AS). Guideline indications for aortic valve replacement (AVR) distinguish between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic severe AS. The present analysis aims to assess contemporary practice in the treatment of severe AS across Europe and identify characteristics associated with treatment decisions, namely denial of AVR in symptomatic patients and assignment of asymptomatic patients to AVR. METHODS: Participants of the prospective, multinational IMPULSE database of patients with severe AS were grouped according to AS symptoms, and stratified into subgroups based on assignment to/denial of AVR. RESULTS: Of 1608 symptomatic patients, 23.8% did not undergo AVR and underwent medical treatment. Denial was independently associated with multiple factors, including severe frailty (p=0.024); mitral (p=0.002) or tricuspid (p=0.004) regurgitation grade III/IV, and the presence of renal impairment (p=0.017). Of 392 asymptomatic patients, 86.5% had no prespecified indication for AVR. Regardless, 36.3% were assigned to valve replacement. Those with an indexed aortic valve area (AVA; p=0.045) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; p<0.001) below the study median; or with a left ventricular end systolic diameter above the study median (p=0.007) were more likely to be assigned to AVR. CONCLUSIONS: There may be considerable discrepancies between guideline-based recommendations and clinical practice decision-making in the treatment of AS. It appears that guidelines may not fully capture the complete clinical spectrum of patients with AS. Thus, there is a need to find ways to increase their acceptance and the rate of adoption.

4th Medical Department Hietzing Hospital Vienna Austria

Cardiology Department AKH Celle Celle Niedersachsen Germany

Centre Hospital d'Annecy Annecy France

Department for Cardiology Helios Clinic Erfurt Germany

Department of Cardiology and Angiology University of Kiel Kiel Schleswig Holstein Germany

Department of Cardiology Hear and Diabetes Center Bad Oeynhausen Ruhr University of Bochum Bad Oeynhausen Germany

Department of Cardiology University Hospital Erlangen Erlangen Bayern Germany

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Foundation IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo Pavia Italy

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Division of Cardiology and URT CNR of IFC University Magna Graecia Catanzaro Calabria Italy

Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland

Edwards Lifesciences Prague Czech Republic

Herzkatheterlabor Nymphenburg and Department of Cardiology University of Munich Munich Bayern Germany

Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin GmbH Cloppenburg Germany

Interventional Cardiology Unit Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Catalunya Spain

James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK

Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK

University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands

University of Bari Bari Puglia Italy

University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

University of Turin Turin Piemonte Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Vahanian A, Alfieri O. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2012;33:2451–96. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109 PubMed DOI

Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. . 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391 PubMed DOI

Kang D-H, Park S-J, Lee S-A, et al. . Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:111–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1912846 PubMed DOI

Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. . Decision-Making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J 2005;26:2714–20. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi471 PubMed DOI

Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH, et al. . To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart 1999;82:143–8. 10.1136/hrt.82.2.143 PubMed DOI PMC

Frey N, Steeds RP, Serra A, et al. . Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE). BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:5. 10.1186/s12872-016-0439-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Frey N, Steeds RP, Rudolph TK, et al. . Symptoms, disease severity and treatment of adults with a new diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2019;105:1709–16. 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314940 PubMed DOI

Steeds RP, Lutz M, Thambyrajah J, et al. . Facilitated data relay and effects on treatment of severe aortic stenosis in Europe. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e013160. 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160 PubMed DOI PMC

Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. . Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970;10:20–30. 10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20 PubMed DOI

Iung B, Delgado V, Rosenhek R, et al. . Contemporary presentation and management of valvular heart disease: the EURObservational research programme valvular heart disease II survey. Circulation 2019;140:1156–69. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041080 PubMed DOI

Ludman PF, Van Domburg R. The scientific value of TAVI surveys: insights and perspectives from European centres and European patients. EuroIntervention 2016;12:823–6. 10.4244/EIJV12I7A136 PubMed DOI

Ramaraj R, Sorrell VL. Degenerative aortic stenosis. BMJ 2008;336:550–5. 10.1136/bmj.39478.498819.AD PubMed DOI PMC

Elmariah S, Palacios IF, McAndrew T, et al. . Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (partner) trial (cohort a). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:604–14. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000650 PubMed DOI

Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Herzberger V, et al. . Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a single-centre experience in 2000 patients (TAVIK registry). Clin Res Cardiol 2017;106:1018–25. 10.1007/s00392-017-1151-9 PubMed DOI

Pilgrim T, Wenaweser P, Meuli F, et al. . Clinical outcome of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing medical treatment or TAVI. PLoS One 2011;6:e27556. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027556 PubMed DOI PMC

Clavel MA, Webb JG, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. . Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation 2010;122:1928–36. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.929893 PubMed DOI

Dahl JS, Eleid MF, Michelena HI, et al. . Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:e002917. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002917 PubMed DOI

Carabello BA, Shah PK. Aortic valve replacement should be operated on before symptom onset. Circulation 2012;126:112–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.079350 PubMed DOI

Badran AA, Vohra HA, Livesey SA. Unoperated severe aortic stenosis: decision making in an adult UK-based population. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:416–21. 10.1308/003588412X13171221591817 PubMed DOI PMC

Ifedili IA, Bolorunduro O, Bob-Manuel T, et al. . Impact of pre-existing kidney dysfunction on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Curr Cardiol Rev 2017;13:283–92. 10.2174/1573403X13666170804151608 PubMed DOI PMC

Kawase Y, Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, et al. . Severe aortic stenosis in dialysis patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e004961. 10.1161/JAHA.116.004961 PubMed DOI PMC

Keleş T, Ayhan H, Durmaz T, et al. . Improvement in renal functions with transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Geriatr Cardiol 2013;10:C232–3. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.655 PubMed DOI PMC

Alqahtani F, Aljohani S, Boobes K, et al. . Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients on maintenance dialysis. Am J Med 2017;130:1464.e1–1464.e11. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.031 PubMed DOI PMC

Nuis RJ, Dager AE, van der Boon RM, et al. . Patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI: treatment decision, in-hospital outcome and determinants of survival. Neth Heart J 2012;20:16–23. 10.1007/s12471-011-0224-z PubMed DOI PMC

Boureau AS, Trochu JN, Colliard C, et al. . Determinants in treatment decision-making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Maturitas 2015;82:128–33. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.06.033 PubMed DOI

Bedogni F, Latib A, De Marco F, et al. . Interplay between mitral regurgitation and transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve Revalving system: a multicenter registry. Circulation 2013;128:2145–53. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001822 PubMed DOI

Lindman BR, Maniar HS, Jaber WA, et al. . Effect of tricuspid regurgitation and the right heart on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves II inoperable cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002073. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002073 PubMed DOI PMC

Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH, et al. . Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:689–700. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024 PubMed DOI

Biancari F, Juvonen T, Onorati F, et al. . Meta-Analysis on the performance of the EuroSCORE II and the Society of thoracic surgeons scores in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014;28:1533–9. 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.03.014 PubMed DOI

Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, et al. . Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a placement of aortic transcatheter valves (partner) trial analysis. Circulation 2013;127:2316–26. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001290 PubMed DOI

Katayama M, Chaliki HP. Diagnosis and management of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. World J Cardiol 2016;8:192–200. 10.4330/wjc.v8.i2.192 PubMed DOI PMC

Schymik G. Early and late outcomes after TAVI in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis from the source XT registry. EuroIntervention, 2014.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...