Extracorporeal life support in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: A EuroELSO international survey
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
Federal State of Saarland
Universität des Saarlandes
Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Foundation
PubMed
33590542
PubMed Central
PMC8014805
DOI
10.1111/aor.13940
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- COVID-19, COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome, SARS-CoV-2, extracorporeal life support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, survey,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 therapy MeSH
- Internationality MeSH
- Critical Illness MeSH
- Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Respiratory Insufficiency therapy virology MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome therapy virology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a means to support patients with acute respiratory failure. Initially, recommendations to treat severe cases of pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with ECLS have been restrained. In the meantime, ECLS has been shown to produce similar outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to existing data on ARDS mortality. We performed an international email survey to assess how ECLS providers worldwide have previously used ECLS during the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19. A questionnaire with 45 questions (covering, e.g., indication, technical aspects, benefit, and reasons for treatment discontinuation), mostly multiple choice, was distributed by email to ECLS centers. The survey was approved by the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO); 276 ECMO professionals from 98 centers in 30 different countries on four continents reported that they employed ECMO for very severe COVID-19 cases, mostly in veno-venous configuration (87%). The most common reason to establish ECLS was isolated hypoxemic respiratory failure (50%), followed by a combination of hypoxemia and hypercapnia (39%). Only a small fraction of patients required veno-arterial cannulation due to heart failure (3%). Time on ECLS varied between less than 2 and more than 4 weeks. The main reason to discontinue ECLS treatment prior to patient's recovery was lack of clinical improvement (53%), followed by major bleeding, mostly intracranially (13%). Only 4% of respondents reported that triage situations, lack of staff or lack of oxygenators, were responsible for discontinuation of ECLS support. Most ECLS physicians (51%, IQR 30%) agreed that patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS (CARDS) benefitted from ECLS. Overall mortality of COVID-19 patients on ECLS was estimated to be about 55%. ECLS has been utilized successfully during the COVID-19 pandemic to stabilize CARDS patients in hypoxemic or hypercapnic lung failure. Age and multimorbidity limited the use of ECLS. Triage situations were rarely a concern. ECLS providers stated that patients with severe COVID-19 benefitted from ECLS.
2nd Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Department of Anaesthesiology University Hospital of Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Interdisciplinary COVID 19 Center University Medical Centre Saarland University Homburg Germany
See more in PubMed
Savarimuthu S, BinSaeid J, Harky A. The role of ECMO in COVID‐19: can it provide rescue therapy in those who are critically ill? J Card Surg. 2020;35:1298–301. PubMed PMC
Jäckel M, Rillinger J, Lang CN, Zotzmann V, Kaier K, Stachon P, et al. Outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Covid‐19 or influenza: a single‐center registry study. Artif Organs. 2020:1–9. 10.1111/aor.13865. PubMed DOI PMC
Swol J, Shigemura N, Ichiba S. Artificial lungs–where are we going with the lung replacement therapy? Artif Organs. 2020;44:1135–49. 10.1111/aor.13801. PubMed DOI
Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim C‐M, Divatia JV, et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. May;8:506–17. PubMed PMC
MacLaren G, Fisher D, Brodie D. Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID‐19: the potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JAMA. 2020;323:1245. 10.1001/jama.2020.2342. PubMed DOI
Bartlett RH, Ogino MT, Brodie D, McMullan DM, Lorusso R, MacLaren G. Initial ELSO guidance document: ECMO for COVID‐19 patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure. ASAIO J. 2020;66:472–4. PubMed PMC
Henry BM, Lippi G. Poor survival with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): pooled analysis of early reports. J Crit Care. 2020;58:27–8. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.011. PubMed DOI PMC
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2018;378:1965–75. 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385. PubMed DOI
Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa ELV, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:747–55. PubMed
Ferrando C, Suarez‐Sipmann F, Mellado‐Artigas R, Hernández M, Gea A, Arruti E, et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID‐19 are similar to other causes of ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:2200–11. 10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID‐19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. 2020;396:1071–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32008-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Iba T, Levy JH, Levi M, Connors J, Thachil J. Coagulopathy of coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:1358–1364. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004458. PubMed DOI PMC
Ranucci M, Ballotta A, Di Dedda U, Bayshnikova E, Dei Poli M, Resta M, et al. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1747–51. 10.1111/jth.14854. PubMed DOI PMC
Bemtgen X, Zotzmann V, Benk C, Rilinger J, Steiner K, Asmussen A, et al. Thrombotic circuit complications during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID‐19. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;51:301–307. 10.1007/s11239-020-02217-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061. 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. PubMed DOI PMC
Chen C, Chen C, Yan JT, Zhou N, Zhao JP, Wang DW. Analysis of myocardial injury in patients with COVID‐19 and association between concomitant cardiovascular diseases and severity of COVID‐19. Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi. 2020;48:E008. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200225-00123. PubMed DOI
Lippi G, Lavie CJ, Sanchis‐Gomar F. Cardiac troponin I in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): evidence from a meta‐analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63:390–1. 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Esposito A, Palmisano A, Natale L, Ligabue G, Peretto G, Lovato L, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance characterization of myocarditis‐like acute cardiac syndrome in COVID‐19. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2462–5. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.003. PubMed DOI PMC
Zayat R, Kalverkamp S, Grottke O, Durak K, Dreher M, Autschbach R, et al. Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically Ill COVID‐19 patients and predictors of mortality. Artif Organs. 2020:1–13. 10.1111/aor.13873. PubMed DOI PMC